IMPORTANCE: Keratinocyte cancers (KCs), including basal cell carcinoma (BCC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), are the most common cancers among fair-skinned populations worldwide. Although studies ...have indicated that the anatomical distribution of BCC and SCC differ, few have compared them directly in well-defined population samples. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare the anatomical distribution of BCC and SCC in a population-based sample in Queensland, Australia. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This study was nested within the population-based QSkin Sun and Health Study in Queensland, Australia. Of 37 103 study participants linked to national medical insurance records, 3398 diagnosed with KCs from September 1, 2010, to September 30, 2012, were identified, and information about their KCs was extracted from pathology reports. Data were analyzed from January 1, 2013, to March 30, 2016. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The relative tumor densities (RTDs) on defined body sites, calculated by dividing the proportion of tumors occurring at a specified site by the proportion of skin area of that site. RESULTS: A total of 5150 KCs with complete data were identified in 2374 study participants (1339 men 56.4% and 1035 women 43.6%; mean SD age, 59.7 7.4 years). Of these, 3846 KCs (74.7%) were BCCs. Most BCCs were on the head and/or neck (1547 40.2%) and the trunk (1305 33.9%); most SCCs were on the head and/or neck (435 33.4%) and upper limbs (455 34.9%). The greatest differences in RTDs between BCC and SCC were on the hand (BCC:SCC ratio, 1:14) and the back and/or buttocks (BCC:SCC ratio, 8:1). Relative tumor densities of KCs were higher on the scalp and ear in men compared with women, and on the upper arm in women compared with men. The pattern of RTDs did not differ with age for BCC. Compared with younger adults (40-54 years), the RTDs in older adults (55-69 years) were 2-fold higher for SCC on the scalp (0.38 95% CI, 0.00-0.81 vs 1.07 95% CI, 0.75-1.38) and the back and/or buttocks (0.05 95% CI, 0.00-0.12 vs 0.12 95% CI, 0.07-0.16). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The high RTDs on sun-exposed body sites for BCC and SCC are in keeping with sun exposure as the primary etiologic factor for both tumors. However, for BCC, the low RTD on the hand and high RTDs on less sun-exposed sites suggest a complex association between sun exposure and occurrence of BCC. Knowledge about the anatomical distribution of BCC and SCC may provide insight into their diagnoses and causes.
Risk stratification can improve the efficacy and cost-efficiency of screening programs for early detection of cancer. We sought to derive a risk stratification tool for melanoma that was suitable for ...the general population using only self-reported information.
We used melanoma risk factor information collected at baseline from QSKIN, a prospective cohort study of Queensland adults age 40 to 69 years at recruitment (n = 41 954). We examined two separate outcomes: 1) invasive melanomas and 2) all melanomas (invasive + in situ) obtained through data linkage to the cancer registry. We used stepwise Cox proportional hazards modeling to derive the risk models in a randomly selected two-thirds sample of the data set and assessed model performance in the remaining one-third validation sample.
After a median follow-up of 3.4 years, 655 (1.6%) participants developed melanoma (257 invasive, 398 in situ). The prediction model for invasive melanoma included seven terms. At baseline, the strongest predictors of invasive melanoma were age, sex, tanning ability, number of moles at age 21 years, and number of skin lesions treated destructively. The model for "all melanomas" (ie, invasive and in situ) included five additional terms. Discrimination in the validation data set was high for both models (C-index = 0.69, 95% confidence interval CI = 0.62 to 0.76, and C-index = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.69 to 0.75, respectively), and calibration was acceptable.
Such a tool could be used to target surveillance activities to those at highest predicted risk of developing melanoma over a median duration of 3.4 years.
Sun exposure carries both harms and benefits. Exposing the skin to the sun is the main modifiable cause of skin cancers, which exert a considerable health and economic burden in Australia. The most ...well-established benefit of exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation is vitamin D production. Australia has the highest incidence of skin cancer in the world but, despite the high ambient UV radiation, approximately one quarter of the population is estimated to be vitamin D deficient. Balancing the risks and benefits is challenging and requires effective communication. We sought to provide a snapshot of public knowledge and attitudes regarding sun exposure and vitamin D and to examine the associations between these factors and sun protective behaviors. In 2020 we administered an online survey; 4824 participants with self-reported fair or medium skin color were included in this analysis. Only 25% and 34% of participants were able to identify the amount of time outdoors needed to maintain adequate vitamin D status in summer and winter, respectively and 25% were concerned that sunscreen use inhibits vitamin D synthesis. This lack of knowledge was associated with suboptimal sun protection practices. Public education is warranted to prevent over-exposure, while supporting natural vitamin D production.
Can People Correctly Assess their Future Risk of Melanoma? Olsen, Catherine M.; Pandeya, Nirmala; Dusingize, Jean Claude ...
Journal of investigative dermatology,
March 2021, 2021-Mar, 2021-03-00, 20210301, Letnik:
141, Številka:
3
Journal Article
Sunlight is the principal environmental risk factor for keratinocyte cancers, but other carcinogens have also been implicated, including tobacco smoke. Findings have been conflicting, however. We ...investigated associations between cigarette smoking and incidence of basal cell carcinoma (BCC) or squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in QSkin, a prospective study of skin cancer (N = 43,794). Smoking history was self-reported at baseline; newly diagnosed BCCs and SCCs were ascertained through data linkage and verified by histopathology reports. We restricted analyses to white participants who at baseline reported no past history of skin cancer excisions and no more than five destructively treated actinic skin lesions. We fitted Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for known confounders. Compared with never smokers, current smokers had significantly lower risks of BCC (hazard ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval = 0.4–0.9) but significantly higher risks of SCC (hazard ratio = 2.3; 95% confidence interval = 1.5–3.6). Former smokers had similar risks for BCC and SCC as never smokers. Among smokers, we observed no dose-response trends with duration of smoking, intensity, or time since quitting. On further analysis, current smokers had fewer skin examinations and procedures than never smokers, suggesting greater opportunities for detection among never smokers. Strengths include large sample size, prospective design, and virtually complete follow-up; however, histologic details were missing for a proportion of excised tumors. In conclusion, current smokers had a lower incidence of BCC (possibly because of detection bias) but higher rates of SCC.
Abstract
Background
Height and body mass index (BMI) have both been positively associated with melanoma risk, although findings for BMI have been less consistent than height. It remains unclear, ...however, whether these associations reflect causality or are due to residual confounding by environmental and lifestyle risk factors. We re-evaluated these associations using a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) approach.
Methods
We identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) for BMI and height from separate genome-wide association study (GWAS) meta-analyses. We obtained melanoma SNPs from the most recent melanoma GWAS meta-analysis comprising 12 874 cases and 23 203 controls. We used the inverse variance-weighted estimator to derive separate causal risk estimates across all SNP instruments for BMI and height.
Results
Based on the combined estimate derived from 730 SNPs for BMI, we found no evidence of an association between genetically predicted BMI and melanoma odds ratio (OR) per one standard deviation (1 SD) (4.6 kg/m2) increase in BMI 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.91–1.11. In contrast, we observed a positive association between genetically-predicted height (derived from a pooled estimate of 3290 SNPs) and melanoma risk OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.02–1.13, per 1 SD (9.27 cm) increase in height. Sensitivity analyses using two alternative MR methods yielded similar results.
Conclusions
These findings provide no evidence for a causal association between higher BMI and melanoma, but support the notion that height is causally associated with melanoma risk. Mechanisms through which height influences melanoma risk remain unclear, and it remains possible that the effect could be mediated through diverse pathways including growth factors and even socioeconomic status.
To delineate causal pathways for melanoma, it is essential to derive unbiased estimates of risk. Extant knowledge derives largely from case-control studies with potential for bias. In a ...population-based prospective study (QSkin, n = 38,854), we assessed melanoma risks associated with pigmentation characteristics and other phenotypes, and we explored additive interactions. We fitted Cox proportional hazards models to adjust for other factors to estimate the independent effects of each characteristic on melanoma risk. During a mean follow-up of 3.5 years, 642 (1.5%) participants developed melanoma (253 invasive, 389 in situ). The characteristics most strongly associated with invasive melanoma were self-reported nevus density at age 21 years (many vs. no moles hazard ratio 95% confidence interval = 4.91 2.81–8.55), inability to tan (no tan vs. deep tan, hazard ratio 95% confidence interval = 3.39 1.85–6.20), and red hair color (vs. black, hazard ratio 95% confidence interval = 3.11 1.50–6.43). Propensity to sunburn was not associated with melanoma after tanning inability was adjusted for. People with both high nevus density and a history of multiple keratinocyte cancers had significantly higher melanoma risks than those with only one of those traits. We infer that melanoma risk is more strongly related to nevus density and inability to tan than susceptibility to sunburn.
We aimed to extract the percent of signs and symptoms at the time of diagnosis from published studies and to pool these using meta-analytic techniques.
Delayed or misdiagnosis of chronic pancreatitis ...may occur because the signs and symptoms are nonspecific and varied.
We performed a systematic review of studies reporting the signs and symptoms of chronic pancreatitis at diagnosis. The percentage of patients with each sign and symptom was extracted and random-effects meta-analyses used to calculate pooled percentages.
In total, 22 observational studies were included. Across 14 studies, 55% of chronic pancreatitis patients were classified as having alcoholic etiology. Abdominal pain was the most common symptom (76%), and weight loss was reported in 22% of patients. Jaundice occurred in 11% of patients and steatorrhoea in 3%. Half of the patients had a history of acute pancreatitis, and 28% had diabetes mellitus at diagnosis. Heterogeneity between the studies was high for all signs and symptoms.
This research has identified some common features of patients with chronic pancreatitis, but the high heterogeneity makes it difficult to draw solid conclusions. Carefully designed studies to examine the signs and symptoms leading up to a diagnosis of chronic pancreatitis, and common combinations, are required. These would enable the development of a tool to aid in the early identification of chronic pancreatitis in the primary care setting, with potential for improved short-term and long-term outcomes for patients.
IMPORTANCE: Keratoacanthoma (KA) is a common and generally benign keratinocyte skin tumor. Reports of the incidence rates of KA are scant. In addition, the risk factors for KA are not well ...understood, although associations with UV radiation exposure and older age have been described. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence rate of KA and the risk factors for developing KA. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The study included data from 40 438 of 193 344 randomly selected residents of Queensland, Australia, who participated in the QSkin Sun and Health (QSkin) prospective population-based cohort study. All participants completed a baseline survey between 2010 and 2011 and were ages 40 to 69 years at baseline. Histopathologic reports of KA were prospectively collected until June 30, 2014, through data linkage with pathologic records. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify risk factors associated with KA while controlling for potential confounding variables. Data were analyzed from January 2 to April 8, 2020. EXPOSURES: Demographic characteristics, phenotypes, UV radiation exposure, medical history, and lifestyle. RESULTS: Among 40 438 participants (mean SD age, 56 8 years; 18 240 men 45.1%), 596 individuals (mean SD age, 62 6 years; 349 men 58.6%) developed 776 KA tumors during a median follow-up period of 3.0 years (interquartile range, 2.8-3.3 years). The person-based age-standardized incidence rate for KA in the age-restricted cohort was 409 individuals per 100 000 person-years (based on the 2001 Australian population). Risk factors after adjustment for potential confounders were older age (age ≥60 years vs age <50 years; hazard ratio HR, 6.38; 95% CI, 4.65-8.75), male sex (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.33-1.84), fair skin (vs olive, dark, or black skin; HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.66-7.04), inability to tan (vs ability to tan deeply; HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.19-2.40), previous excisions of keratinocyte cancers (ever had an excision vs never had an excision; HR, 6.28; 95% CI, 5.03-7.83), current smoking (vs never smoking, HR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.59-2.57), and high alcohol use (≥14 alcoholic drinks per week vs no alcoholic drinks per week; HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.09-1.86). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This is, to date, the first large prospective population-based study to report the incidence rate and risk factors for KA. The high person-based incidence rate (409 individuals per 100 000 person-years) highlights the substantial burden of KA in Queensland, Australia. Furthermore, the study’s findings suggest that older age (≥60 years), male sex, UV radiation–sensitive phenotypes, indications of high sun exposure (eg, previous keratinocyte cancer excisions), smoking, and high alcohol use are independent risk factors for the development of KA.
To investigate the accuracy of Medical Benefit Schedule (MBS) item numbers to identify treatments for basal cell carcinomas (BCC) and squamous cell carcinomas (SCC).
We linked records from QSkin ...Study participants (n=37,103) to Medicare. We measured the proportion of Medicare claims for primary excision of BCC/SCC that had corresponding claims for histopathology services. In subsets of participants, we estimated the sensitivity and external concordance of MBS item numbers for identifying BCC/SCC diagnoses by comparing against ‘gold‐standard’ histopathology reports.
A total of 2,821 (7.6%) participants had 4,830 separate Medicare claims for BCC/SCC excision; almost all (97%) had contemporaneous Medicare claims for histopathology services. Among participants with BCC/SCC confirmed by histology reports, 76% had a corresponding Medicare claim for primary surgical excision of BCC/SCC. External concordance for Medicare claims for primary BCC/SCC excision was 68%, increasing to 97% when diagnoses for intra‐epidermal carcinomas and keratoacanthomas were included.
MBS item numbers for primary excision of BCC/SCC are reasonably reliable for determining incident cases of keratinocyte skin cancers, but may underestimate incidence by up to 24%.
Medicare claims data may have utility in monitoring trends in conditions for which there is no mandatory reporting.