Summary Background Few data are available for the efficacy of “triple therapy” with two long-acting bronchodilators and an inhaled corticosteroid in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We ...designed this study to assess efficacy of single-inhaler combination of an extra fine formulation of beclometasone dipropionate, formoterol fumarate, and glycopyrronium bromide (BDP/FF/GB) in COPD compared with beclometasone dipropionate and formoterol fumarate (BDP/FF) treatment. Methods TRILOGY was a randomised, parallel group, double-blind, active-controlled study done in 159 sites across 14 countries. The sites were a mixture of primary, secondary, and tertiary care providers, and specialist investigation units. Eligible patients with COPD had post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) of lower than 50%, one or more moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation in the previous 12 months, COPD Assessment Test total score of 10 or more, and a Baseline Dyspnea Index focal score of 10 or less. Patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria at screening entered a 2-week open-label run-in period where they received beclometasone dipropionate (100 μg) and formoterol fumarate (6 μg) in two actuations twice daily. Patients were then randomly assigned (1:1) with an interactive response technology system to either continue BDP (100 μg) and FF (6 μg) or step-up to BDP (100 μg), FF (6 μg), and GB (12·5 μg) in two actuations twice daily for 52 weeks via pressurised metered-dose inhaler. The three co-primary endpoints were pre-dose FEV1 , 2-h post-dose FEV1 , and Transition Dyspnea Index (TDI) focal score, all measured at week 26 in the intention-to-treat population (all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline efficacy assessment). Safety outcomes were measured in the safety population (all patients who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of study drug). Secondary endpoints included moderate-to-severe COPD exacerbation rate over 52 weeks. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT01917331. Findings Between March 21, 2014, and Jan 14, 2016, 1368 patients received either BDP/FF/GB (n=687) or BDP/FF (n=681). At week 26, BDP/FF/GB improved pre-dose FEV1 by 0·081 L (95% CI 0·052–0·109; p<0·001) and 2-h post-dose FEV1 by 0·117 L (0·086–0·147; p<0·001) compared with BDP/FF. Mean TDI focal scores at week 26 were 1·71 for BDP/FF/GB and 1·50 for BDP/FF, with a difference of 0·21 (95% CI −0·08 to 0·51; p=0·160). Adjusted annual moderate-to-severe exacerbation frequencies were 0·41 for BDP/FF/GB and 0·53 for BDP/FF (rate ratio 0·77 95% CI 0·65–0·92; p=0·005), corresponding to a 23% reduction in exacerbations with BDP/FF/GB compared with BDP/FF. Adverse events were reported by 368 (54%) patients with BDP/FF/GB and 379 (56%) with BDP/FF. One serious treatment-related adverse event occurred (atrial fibrillation) in a patient in the BDP/FF/GB group. Interpretation We provide evidence for the clinical benefits of stepping up patients with COPD from an inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting β2 -agonist combination treatment to triple therapy using a single inhaler. Funding Chiesi Farmaceutici SpA.
Challenges in the differentiation of the aetiology of acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD) have led to significant overuse of antibiotics. Serum procalcitonin, ...released in response to bacterial infections, but not viral infections, could possibly identify AECOPD requiring antibiotics. In this meta-analysis we assessed the clinical effectiveness of procalcitonin-based protocols to initiate or discontinue antibiotics in patients presenting with AECOPD.Based on a prospectively registered protocol, we reviewed the literature and selected randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing procalcitonin-based protocols to initiate or discontinue antibiotics versus standard care in AECOPD. We followed Cochrane and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation) guidance to assess risk of bias, quality of evidence and to perform meta-analyses.We included eight trials evaluating 1062 patients with AECOPD. Procalcitonin-based protocols decreased antibiotic prescription (relative risk (RR) 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.73) and total antibiotic exposure (mean difference (MD) -3.83, 95% CI (-4.32--3.35)), without affecting clinical outcomes such as rate of treatment failure (RR 0.81, 0.62-1.06), length of hospitalisation (MD -0.76, -1.95-0.43), exacerbation recurrence rate (RR 0.96, 0.69-1.35) or mortality (RR 0.99, 0.58-1.69). However, the quality of the available evidence is low to moderate, because of methodological limitations and small overall study population.Procalcitonin-based protocols appear to be clinically effective; however, confirmatory trials with rigorous methodology are required.
This trial involving more than 6000 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared the effects on all-cause mortality of treatment with an inhaler containing both salmeterol and ...fluticasone, salmeterol or fluticasone alone, or placebo. After 3 years, the study showed a reduction of 2.6 percentage points in the mortality rate; this fell short of the study's prespecified goals. There were improved clinical outcomes among patients treated with the combination regimen.
This trial involving more than 6000 patients with COPD compared the effects on all-cause mortality of treatment with an inhaler containing both salmeterol and fluticasone, salmeterol or fluticasone alone, or placebo. After 3 years, the study showed a reduction of 2.6 percentage points in the mortality rate, which fell short of the prespecified goal.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a major cause of illness, death, and the use of health care resources globally.
1
–
3
The disease causes approximately 2.75 million deaths annually, and the number is projected to increase.
2
Treatment for COPD is focused on minimizing risk factors, improving symptoms, and preventing exacerbations.
3
With the exception of smoking-cessation programs for patients with early disease,
4
home oxygen treatment for persistent hypoxemia,
5
,
6
and lung-reduction surgery for selected patients with emphysema,
7
no treatment has been shown to reduce mortality.
Pulmonary inflammation is prominent in COPD.
8
Antiinflammatory drugs such as inhaled corticosteroids have little or no . . .
Accurate prediction of mortality helps select patients for interventions aimed at improving outcome.
Because chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is characterized by low-grade systemic inflammation, ...we hypothesized that addition of inflammatory biomarkers to established predictive factors will improve accuracy.
A total of 1,843 patients enrolled in the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints study were followed for 3 years. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank analysis, and Cox proportional hazards analyses determined the predictive value for mortality of clinical variables, while C statistics assessed the added discriminative power offered by addition of biomarkers.
At recruitment we measured anthropometrics, spirometry, 6-minute walk distance, dyspnea, BODE index, history of hospitalization, comorbidities, and computed tomography scan emphysema. White blood cell and neutrophil counts, serum or plasma levels of fibrinogen, chemokine ligand 18, surfactant protein D, C-reactive protein, Clara cell secretory protein-16, IL-6 and -8, and tumor necrosis factor-α were determined at recruitment and subsequent visits. A total of 168 of the 1,843 patients (9.1%) died. Nonsurvivors were older and had more severe airflow limitation, increased dyspnea, higher BODE score, more emphysema, and higher rates of comorbidities and history of hospitalizations. The best predictive model for mortality using clinical variables included age, BODE, and hospitalization history (C statistic of 0.686; P < 0.001). One single biomarker (IL-6) significantly improved the C statistic to 0.708, but this was further improved to 0.726 (P = 0.003) by the addition of all biomarkers.
The addition of a panel of selected biomarkers improves the ability of established clinical variables to predict mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00292552).
A substantial proportion of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have never smoked. We tested the hypothesis that, in individuals with COPD, never smokers have different ...characteristics and less severe outcomes of the disease than smokers do.
We included individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study, a prospective population study. We identified individuals with COPD spirometrically; that is, as the ratio between forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC) under the lower limit of normal (LLN), excluding individuals with self-reported asthma. We examined general characteristics, symptoms, disease severity, and levels of inflammatory biomarkers and α1-antitrypsin at baseline. We assessed risk of lung-related hospital admissions, cardiovascular comorbidities, and all-cause mortality during a median follow-up of 4 years (IQR 2.5-5.6).
Between Nov 26, 2003, and July 29, 2010, 68,501 participants from the Copenhagen General Population Study had lung function measurements and complete information on smoking habits available. Of those, we identified 6623 with COPD and no asthma. Of these, 1476 (22%) were never smokers, 2696 (41%) former smokers, and 2451 (37%) current smokers. For comparison we included 24,529 never smokers without COPD. Never smokers with COPD had different clinical characteristics, fewer symptoms, milder disease, and lower levels of inflammatory biomarkers than did current and former smokers with COPD. During follow-up, HRs for hospital admission due to COPD were 8.6 (95% CI 5.3-14) in never smokers, 30 (22-41) in former smokers, and 43 (32-59) in current smokers compared with never smokers without COPD. HRs for hospital admission due to pneumonia were 1.9 (1.4-2.6) in never smokers, 2.8 (2.3-3.4) in former smokers, and 3.4 (2.9-4.2) in current smokers. For hospital admission due to lung cancer, HRs were 11 (5.7-23) in former smokers and 18 (9.2-35) in current smokers, whereas no cases were noted in never smokers. Furthermore, risk of cardiovascular comorbidities and all-cause mortality was increased in former and current smokers but not in never smokers with COPD.
Compared with current and former smokers, never smokers with COPD had different characteristics and milder disease, limited to the lungs. However, morbidity due to lung-related hospital admissions was nonetheless substantial in never smokers with COPD.
Herlev Hospital, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen County Foundation, and University of Copenhagen.
Over the past decade there has been much research and interest in COPD. As a result, the understanding and management of the disease has improved significantly. Yet, there are many uncertainties and ...controversies that require further work. This review discusses these controversies and anticipates some of the changes that may occur in the near future in the field of COPD.
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex condition with pulmonary and extra-pulmonary manifestations. This study describes the heterogeneity of COPD in a large and well characterised ...and controlled COPD cohort (ECLIPSE).
We studied 2164 clinically stable COPD patients, 337 smokers with normal lung function and 245 never smokers. In these individuals, we measured clinical parameters, nutritional status, spirometry, exercise tolerance, and amount of emphysema by computed tomography.
COPD patients were slightly older than controls and had more pack years of smoking than smokers with normal lung function. Co-morbidities were more prevalent in COPD patients than in controls, and occurred to the same extent irrespective of the GOLD stage. The severity of airflow limitation in COPD patients was poorly related to the degree of breathlessness, health status, presence of co-morbidity, exercise capacity and number of exacerbations reported in the year before the study. The distribution of these variables within each GOLD stage was wide. Even in subjects with severe airflow obstruction, a substantial proportion did not report symptoms, exacerbations or exercise limitation. The amount of emphysema increased with GOLD severity. The prevalence of bronchiectasis was low (4%) but also increased with GOLD stage. Some gender differences were also identified.
The clinical manifestations of COPD are highly variable and the degree of airflow limitation does not capture the heterogeneity of the disease.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
The new Global Initiative for Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stratification of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) into categories A, B, C, and D is based on symptoms, level of lung ...function, and history of exacerbations.
To investigate the abilities of this stratification to predict the clinical course of COPD.
Two similar population studies were performed in an area of Copenhagen including 6,628 individuals with COPD.
The patients were monitored for an average period of 4.3 years regarding COPD exacerbations, hospital admissions, and mortality. The percentages of individuals experiencing a COPD exacerbation during the first year of observation were 2.2% in group A, 5.8% in group B, 25.1% in group C, and 28.6% in group D. One- and 3-year mortality rates were 0.6 and 3.8%, respectively, in group A, 3.0 and 10.6% in group B, 0.7 and 8.2% in group C, and 3.4 and 20.1% in group D. Groups B and D, characterized by a higher degree of dyspnea than groups A and C, had five to eight times higher mortality from cardiovascular disease and cancer than did groups A and C.
The new stratification performs well by identifying individuals at risk of exacerbations. Surprisingly, subgroup B, characterized by more severe dyspnea, had significantly poorer survival than group C, in spite of a higher FEV(1) level. This subgroup warrants special attention, as the poor prognosis could be caused by cardiovascular disease or cancer, requiring additional assessment and treatment.
PDF
