Diabet. Med. 28, 643–651 (2011)
It has long been recognized that cardiac autonomic neuropathy increases morbidity and mortality in diabetes and may have greater predictive power than traditional risk ...factors for cardiovascular events. Significant morbidity and mortality can now be attributable to autonomic imbalance between the sympathetic and parasympathetic nervous system regulation of cardiovascular function. New and emerging syndromes include orthostatic tachycardia, orthostatic bradycardia and an inability to use heart rate as a guide to exercise intensity because of the resting tachycardia. Recent studies have shown that autonomic imbalance may be a predictor of risk of sudden death with intensification of glycaemic control. This review examines an association of autonomic dysregulation and the role of inflammatory cytokines and adipocytokines that promote cardiovascular risk. In addition, conditions of autonomic imbalance associated with cardiovascular risk are discussed. Potential treatment for restoration of autonomic balance is outlined.
Up to 25% of individuals with diabetes develop painful diabetic neuropathy, suffering spontaneous pain, allodynia, hyperalgesia, and other unpleasant symptoms. Decreased physical activity, increased ...fatigue, and mood and sleep problems may result.
A MEDLINE search was conducted, limiting searching to double-blind, randomized, controlled trials (1978 to present) of antiepileptic drugs (carbamazepine, gabapentin, pregabalin, topiramate, and lamotrigine) used in the treatment of chronic neuropathic pain.
The most important aspect of treatment is targeted at modification of the underlying disease. However, approaches to symptomatic pain control are essential and include multiple drug classes. Tricyclic antidepressants, including imipramine, nortriptyline, and amitriptyline, have been the mainstays of treatment, but anticholinergic effects, such as dry mouth, blurring of vision, constipation, orthostatic hypotension, and cardiac arrhythmias, as well as other adverse effects, often limit their use. Other treatments include capsaicin, clonidine, acupuncture, and electrical stimulation, suggesting that there is no single effective treatment. First-generation antiepileptic drugs have been shown to be effective in neuropathic pain. The evidence supporting the use of a new generation of antiepileptic drugs in painful diabetic neuropathy is reviewed.
In a phase III trial in patients with advanced, well-differentiated, progressive pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib 37.5 mg/day improved investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) ...versus placebo (11.4 versus 5.5 months; HR, 0.42; P < 0.001). Here, we present PFS using retrospective blinded independent central review (BICR) and final median overall survival (OS), including an assessment highlighting the impact of patient crossover from placebo to sunitinib.
In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, cross-sectional imaging from patients was evaluated retrospectively by blinded third-party radiologists using a two-reader, two-time-point lock, followed by a sequential locked-read, batch-mode paradigm. OS was summarized using the Kaplan–Meier method and Cox proportional hazards model. Crossover-adjusted OS effect was derived using rank-preserving structural failure time (RPSFT) analyses.
Of 171 randomized patients (sunitinib, n = 86; placebo, n = 85), 160 (94%) had complete scan sets/time points. By BICR, median (95% confidence interval CI) PFS was 12.6 (11.1–20.6) months for sunitinib and 5.8 (3.8–7.2) months for placebo (HR, 0.32; 95% CI 0.18–0.55; P = 0.000015). Five years after study closure, median (95% CI) OS was 38.6 (25.6–56.4) months for sunitinib and 29.1 (16.4–36.8) months for placebo (HR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.50–1.06; P = 0.094), with 69% of placebo patients having crossed over to sunitinib. RPSFT analysis confirmed an OS benefit for sunitinib.
BICR confirmed the doubling of PFS with sunitinib compared with placebo. Although the observed median OS improved by nearly 10 months, the effect estimate did not reach statistical significance, potentially due to crossover from placebo to sunitinib.
NCT00428597.
Diabetic neuropathies Vinik, A I; Mehrabyan, Anahit
The Medical clinics of North America,
07/2004, Letnik:
88, Številka:
4
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Diabetic neuropathy (DN) is a common complication of diabetes that often is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology and natural history of DN is clouded with ...uncertainty because of confusion regarding the definition and measurement of this disorder. The recent resurgence of interest in the vascular hypothesis, oxidative stress, the neurotrophic hypothesis,and the possibility of the role of autoimmunity has opened up new avenues of investigation for therapeutic intervention. The ability to manage successfully the many different manifestations of diabetic neuropathy depends ultimately on success in uncovering the pathogenic processes underlying this disorder.
NIDDK, JDRF, and the Diabetic Neuropathy Study Group of EASD sponsored a meeting to explore the current status of animal models of diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The goal of the workshop was to ...develop a set of consensus criteria for the phenotyping of rodent models of diabetic neuropathy. The discussion was divided into five areas: (1) status of commonly used rodent models of diabetes, (2) nerve structure, (3) electrophysiological assessments of nerve function, (4) behavioral assessments of nerve function, and (5) the role of biomarkers in disease phenotyping. Participants discussed the current understanding of each area, gold standards (if applicable) for assessments of function, improvements of existing techniques, and utility of known and exploratory biomarkers. The research opportunities in each area were outlined, providing a possible roadmap for future studies. The meeting concluded with a discussion on the merits and limitations of a unified approach to phenotyping rodent models of diabetic neuropathy and a consensus formed on the definition of the minimum criteria required for establishing the presence of the disease. A neuropathy phenotype in rodents was defined as the presence of statistically different values between diabetic and control animals in 2 of 3 assessments (nocifensive behavior, nerve conduction velocities, or nerve structure). The participants propose that this framework would allow different research groups to compare and share data, with an emphasis on data targeted toward the therapeutic efficacy of drug interventions.
Using identical methods, three simultaneous placebo-controlled trials of topiramate for painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) did not reach significance. This independent yet concurrent ...placebo-controlled trial used different methods to assess topiramate efficacy and tolerability in PDN.
This 12-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind trial included 323 subjects with PDN and pain visual analog (PVA) score of at least 40 on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). Topiramate (n = 214) or placebo (n = 109) was titrated to 400 mg daily or maximum tolerated dose. Short-acting rescue analgesics were permitted only during the first 6 weeks.
Baseline characteristics were comparable between groups except for mean body weight (topiramate, 101.4 kg; placebo, 95.7 kg; p = 0.028). Twelve weeks of topiramate treatment reduced PVA scale score (from 68.0 to 46.2 mm) more effectively than placebo (from 69.1 to 54.0 mm; p = 0.038). Fifty percent of topiramate-treated subjects and 34% of placebo-treated subjects responded to treatment, defined as >30% reduction in PVA scale score (p = 0.004). Topiramate monotherapy also reduced worst pain intensity (p = 0.003 vs placebo) and sleep disruption (p = 0.020 vs placebo). Diarrhea, loss of appetite, and somnolence were the most commonly reported adverse events in the topiramate group. Topiramate reduced body weight (-2.6 vs +0.2 kg for placebo; p < 0.001) without disrupting glycemic control.
Topiramate monotherapy reduced pain and body weight more effectively than placebo in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.
Objective: The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of pregabalin for painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy (pDPN) in subjects with type 1 (T1DM) or 2 diabetes mellitus ...(T2DM).
Methods: Pooled data from 10 randomized clinical trials (pregabalin-treated T1DM and T2DM subjects with pDPN) were analyzed for change from baseline (CFB) scores (pain and sleep disturbance) using mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) through Week 12 and last observation carried forward (LOCF). Adverse events (AEs) were recorded.
Results: Pregabalin-treated (T1DM 156 8.7%; T2DM 1632 91.3%) and placebo subjects (T1DM 92 9.6%; T2DM 868 90.4%) had comparable baseline demographic characteristics between treatment groups within the same diabetes type. T2DM (vs. T1DM) subjects were ∼10 years older. With pregabalin and placebo, respectively, mean ± SD baseline pain (T1DM: 6.2 ± 1.4 and 6.5 ± 1.6; T2DM: 6.5 ± 1.5 and 6.4 ± 1.5) and sleep scores (T1DM: 5.2 ± 2.4 and 5.2 ± 2.7; T2DM: 5.3 ± 2.5 and 5.1 ± 2.5) were comparable. Using MMRM, mean CFB treatment differences (pregabalin minus placebo) were significantly different for pain and sleep with either diabetes types (all weeks p < .05). With LOCF, pregabalin's odds ratios (ORs) of achieving 30% pain reduction were similar with T2DM (OR, 1.91, 95% CI 1.61, 2.27) and T1DM (2.01 1.18, 3.44) (both p ≤ .01). Pregabalin's ORs of 30% improvement in sleep quality were 1.81 (95% CI, 1.06, 3.09) with T1DM and 2.01 (1.69, 2.39) with T2DM (both p < .05). AEs were consistent with the known safety profile of pregabalin.
Conclusions: Pregabalin significantly improved pain and sleep quality, without a clinically meaningful difference between diabetes types.
ClinicalTrial.gov registration: NCT00156078, NCT00159679, NCT00143156, NCT00553475.
Background Despite the relatively high prevelance of gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia, the aetiology and pathophysiology of these disorders remain incompletely understood. Similarly, the ...diagnostic and treatment options for these two disorders are relatively limited despite recent advances in our understanding of both disorders.
Purpose This manuscript reviews the advances in the understanding of the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia as discussed at a recent conference sponsored by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) and the American Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society (ANMS). Particular focus is placed on discussing unmet needs and areas for future research.
Diabetic neuropathies VINIK, A. I; PARK, T. S; STANSBERRY, K. B ...
Diabetologia,
08/2000, Letnik:
43, Številka:
8
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Diabetic neuropathy is a common complication of diabetes that is often associated both with considerable morbidity and mortality. The epidemiology and natural course of diabetic neuropathy is clouded ...with uncertainty, largely due to confusion regarding the definition and measurement of this disorder. The recent resurgence of interest in the vascular hypothesis, oxidative stress, the neurotrophic hypothesis and the possibility of the role of autoimmunity have opened up new avenues of investigation for therapeutic intervention. Paralleling our increased understanding of the pathogenesis of diabetic neuropathy, there must be refinements in our ability to measure quantitatively the different types of defects that occur in this disorder, so that appropriate therapies can be targeted to specific fibre types. These tests must be validated and standardised to allow comparability between studies and a more meaningful interpretation of study results. Our ability to manage successfully the many different manifestations of diabetic neuropathy depends ultimately on our success in uncovering the pathogenic processes underlying this disorder.
PDF
