Proteasome inhibition is a validated strategy for therapy of multiple myeloma, but this disease remains challenging as relapses are common, and often associated with increasing chemoresistance. ...Moreover, nonspecific proteasome inhibitors such as bortezomib can induce peripheral neuropathy and other toxicities that may compromise the ability to deliver therapy at full doses, thereby decreasing efficacy. One novel approach may be to target the immunoproteasome, a proteasomal variant found predominantly in cells of hematopoietic origin that differs from the constitutive proteasome found in most other cell types. Using purified preparations of constitutive and immunoproteasomes, we screened a rationally designed series of peptidyl-aldehydes and identified several with relative specificity for the immunoproteasome. The most potent immunoproteasome-specific inhibitor, IPSI-001, preferentially targeted the β1i subunit of the immunoproteasome in vitro and in cellulo in a dose-dependent manner. This agent induced accumulation of ubiquitin-protein conjugates, proapoptotic proteins, and activated caspase-mediated apoptosis. IPSI-001 potently inhibited proliferation in myeloma patient samples and other hematologic malignancies. Importantly, IPSI-001 was able to overcome conventional and novel drug resistance, including resistance to bortezomib. These findings provide a rationale for the translation of IPSIs to the clinic, where they may provide antimyeloma activity with greater specificity and less toxicity than current inhibitors.
Background
Belantamab mafodotin (belamaf) has shown promising antimyeloma activity in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) as a single agent. It was hypothesized that its multimodal ...activity may be enhanced by programmed cell death protein 1 pathway inhibition and activation of T cell–mediated antitumor responses. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of belamaf with pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM.
Methods
DREAMM‐4 (NCT03848845) was an open‐label, single‐arm, phase 1/2 study divided into dose‐escalation (part 1) and dose‐expansion (part 2) phases. Patients were ≥18 years old with ≥3 prior lines of therapy including a proteasome inhibitor, an immunomodulatory drug, and an anti‐CD38 agent. Patients received belamaf (2.5 or 3.4 mg/kg, part 1; 2.5 mg/kg, part 2) and 200 mg pembrolizumab for ≤35 cycles.
Results
Of 41 enrolled patients, 34 (n = 6 part 1, n = 28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab were included in this final analysis. Sixteen patients (47%) achieved an overall response. Minimal residual disease negativity was achieved in three of 10 patients who had very good partial response or better. Five of eight patients who had prior anti–B‐cell maturation antigen therapy achieved partial response or better, including two who had B‐cell maturation antigen–refractory disease. Common grade ≥3 adverse events were keratopathy (38%) and thrombocytopenia (29%). Despite belamaf‐related ocular events, quality‐of‐life measures remained stable over time. No new safety signals were observed.
Conclusions
The results of DREAMM‐4 demonstrated clinical activity and a favorable safety profile of belamaf plus pembrolizumab in patients with RRMM. This trial is registered at www.ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT03848845.
The phase 1/2 DREAMM‐4 study evaluated the combination of a B‐cell maturation antigen–directed antibody‐drug conjugate, belantamab mafodotin (belamaf), plus pembrolizumab in patients with heavily pretreated, triple class–exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Of the 34 patients (n = 6 part 1, n = 28 part 2) who received 2.5 mg/kg belamaf plus pembrolizumab included in this final analysis, 16 (47%) had an overall response, with 29% having a very good partial response or better. The median progression‐free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 1.4–5.6). The addition of pembrolizumab to belamaf did not lead to new or unexpected safety signals; however, there was only a modest difference in clinical activity observed beyond that achieved with single‐agent belamaf and further investigation of the combination is not planned at this time.
Summary
Interleukin‐6 (IL6) plays a central role in multiple myeloma pathogenesis and confers resistance to corticosteroid‐induced apoptosis. We therefore evaluated the efficacy and safety of ...siltuximab, an anti‐IL6 monoclonal antibody, alone and in combination with dexamethasone, for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma who had ≥2 prior lines of therapy, one of which had to be bortezomib‐based. Fourteen initial patients received siltuximab alone, 10 of whom had dexamethasone added for suboptimal response; 39 subsequent patients were treated with concurrent siltuximab and dexamethasone. Patients received a median of four prior lines of therapy, 83% were relapsed and refractory, and 70% refractory to their last dexamethasone‐containing regimen. Suppression of serum C‐reactive protein levels, a surrogate marker of IL6 inhibition, was demonstrated. There were no responses to siltuximab but combination therapy yielded a partial (17%) + minimal (6%) response rate of 23%, with responses seen in dexamethasone‐refractory disease. The median time to progression, progression‐free survival and overall survival for combination therapy was 4·4, 3·7 and 20·4 months respectively. Haematological toxicity was common but manageable. Infections occurred in 57% of combination‐treated patients, including ≥grade 3 infections in 18%. Further study of siltuximab in modern corticosteroid‐containing myeloma regimens is warranted, with special attention to infection‐related toxicity.
Abstract Chronic neutrophilic leukemia (CNL) is a rare myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN) characterized by peripheral blood neutrophilia, marrow granulocyte hyperplasia, hepatosplenomegaly, and driver ...mutations in the colony‐stimulating factor 3 receptor ( CSF3R ). Designation of activating CSF3R mutations as a defining genomic abnormality for CNL has led to increased recognition of the disease. However, the natural history of CNL remains poorly understood with most patients reported being of older age, lacking germline data, and having poor survival, in part due to transformation to acute leukemia. CSF3R driver mutations in most patients with CNL have been reported to be acquired, although rare cases of germline mutations have been described. Here, we report the largest pedigree to date with familial CNL, spanning four generations with affected family members ranging in age from 4 to 53 years, none of whom have transformed to acute leukemia. A heterozygous T618I CSF3R mutation was identified in peripheral blood and mesenchymal stromal cells from the proband and in all affected living family members, while the unaffected family members tested were homozygous wild type. We show that the T618I mutation also confers a survival advantage to neutrophils in an MCL1‐dependent manner. Collectively, these data provide additional insights into the natural history of familial CNL arising from T618I CSF3R mutations and suggest that enhanced neutrophil survival also contributes to the high neutrophil count observed in patients with CNL.
Siltuximab is recommended by international consensus as a first-line treatment for idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease on the basis of durable efficacy and safety data. This study was done to ...assess the long-term safety and activity of siltuximab over up to 6 years of treatment.
This study is a prespecified open-label extension analysis of a phase 1 trial (NCT00412321) and a phase 2 trial (NCT01024036), done at 26 hospitals worldwide. Patients in both studies were at least 18 years old with histologically confirmed, symptomatic Castleman disease. This extension study enrolled 60 patients who completed the previous trials without disease progression on siltuximab. Patients received siltuximab infusions of 11 mg/kg every 3 weeks (which could be extended to 6 weeks) for up to 6 years. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. No formal hypothesis testing was performed. The primary endpoint was the safety of siltuximab, assessed at each dosing cycle. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01400503 and with EudraCT, number 2010-022837-27.
Patient enrolment into the phase 1 trial was from June 20, 2005, to Sept 15, 2009, and enrolment into the phase 2 trial was from Feb 9, 2010, to Feb 3, 2012. Patients were enrolled in this long-term extension from April 1, 2011, to Jan 15, 2014. Median follow-up was 6 years (IQR 5·11-7·76). Median treatment duration, from the beginning of the previous trials to the end of the present study, was 5·5 years (IQR 4·26-7·14). Siltuximab was well tolerated; however, adverse events of grade 3 or worse were reported in 36 (60%) of 60 patients with the most common being hypertension (eight 13%), fatigue (five 8%), nausea (four 7%), neutropenia (four 7%), and vomiting (three 5%). 25 (42%) patients reported at least one serious adverse event, which most commonly was an infection (eight 13%). Only two serious adverse events, polycythaemia and urinary retention, were considered related to siltuximab treatment. 18 patients discontinued before study completion, either to receive siltuximab locally (eight) or because of progressive disease (two), adverse events (two), or other reasons (six). No deaths were reported.
These results show that siltuximab is well tolerated long term and provides important evidence for the feasibility of the life-long use required by patients with idiopathic multicentric Castleman disease.
Janssen R&D and EUSA Pharma.
Preclinical studies have demonstrated activity of the oral proteasome inhibitor (PI) ixazomib (IXA) in bortezomib‐resistant multiple myeloma (MM) and synergy with immunomodulatory drugs. We therefore ...conducted a phase I/II study to establish the safety and preliminary efficacy of IXA with pomalidomide (POM) and dexamethasone (DEX) in lenalidomide (LEN)/PI‐refractory MM. Dose escalation established a 4 mg dose of POM and IXA and 20/40 mg dose of DEX as the maximum tolerated dose. The phase II portion of the trial was redesigned and started anew after six patients had been randomized to IXA‐POM‐DEX due to a rapidly changing treatment landscape. Among the 29 evaluable LEN/PI‐refractory patients treated with IXA‐POM‐DEX in phase I/II, the overall response rate (partial response or better) was 51.7% with a median duration of response of 16.8 months (range 56 days to 4.1 years), median progression‐free survival of 4.4 months (95% confidence interval CI: 3.0–18.4), and median overall survival of 34.3 months (95% CI: 19.2 to not reached). Hematologic, gastrointestinal, and constitutional adverse events were common and consistent with the side‐effect profiles of the individual agents. Our results support further evaluation of this all‐oral regimen in relapsed/refractory MM.
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a chronically managed blood cancer with a median age of 69 years at the time of diagnosis. Although high dose melphalan and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) ...remains a standard of care for eligible patients, more than half of the newly diagnosed MM patients are deemed ineligible due to comorbidities or complications of the disease by itself. In this setting, where ASCT is deemed inappropriate, patients could still achieve durable and deep responses if given the appropriate treatment plan. The key concepts of optimizing induction and maintenance strategies while minimizing side-effects are discussed in this review, especially in the context of employing novel agent combinations. It is important to understand the balance between safety and efficacy for each regimen, utilizing maintenance strategy and the best supportive care measures (bone health, infection prevention, and treatment, pain management, etc.). Here, we examine the evidence behind each of those principles and review results from clinical trials for transplant-ineligible (TI) MM.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IJS, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Selinexor (Seli) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of the nuclear export protein, exportin-1 (XPO1). Seli exhibits its antitumor effect through the blockage of XPO1, which increases ...nuclear retention of tumor suppressor proteins (TSPs), including p53, thereby limiting the translation of oncogenes, triggering cell cycle arrest and the death of malignant cells. Multiple Myeloma (MM) patients with del17p are deficient in TP53 and have a particularly poor prognosis. Given its unique mechanism of action, we investigated whether Seli has increased efficacy in RRMM patients with del17p compared to other high-risk cytogenetics (OHRC). This is an IRB-approved observational study of RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics (del17p, t (4;14), t (14;16) or gain 1q) or standard-risk cytogenetics treated at the Levine Cancer Institute (LCI) with a Seli-based regimen between January 2019 and December 2022. Time-to-event endpoints (PFS, OS) were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) methods. Log-rank tests compared time-to-event endpoints between cohorts del17p vs. OHRC vs. standard risk. We identified 40 RRMM patients with high-risk cytogenetics, including 16 patients with del17p and 24 patients with OHRC, as well as 20 with standard-risk cytogenetics. The median age was 62.5 vs. 69 vs. 65.5 years (del17p group vs. OHRC vs. standard risk). The median prior line of therapies was five (range: 3-16) with similar rates of prior autologous stem cell transplant in all arms (68.8% vs. 62.5% vs. 70.0%). The most frequently used regimens were Seli-Pomalidomide-dexamethasone(dex) or Seli-Carfilzomib-dex (Seli-Kd) in the del17p group and Seli-Kd in the OHRC and standard-risk groups. The median time to start the Seli-based regimen after initial MM diagnosis was 5.6 years for the del17p group, 4.1 years in OHRC, and 4.8 years in the standard-risk group. The median follow-up time after the start of the Seli-based regimen was 10.5 months (mos) in the del17p group, 8.4 mos in OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group. In the del17p group, 50% had an objective response, 41.7% in the OHRC, and 35% in the standard-risk group (
= 0.71). Depth of response was also similar across the arms (12.5% vs. 12.5% vs. 10.0% VGPR
= 0.99). The median OS was 10.9 mos in the del17p group, 10.3 mos in the OHRC, and 10.3 mos in the standard-risk group (
= 0.92). The median OS was 15.5 mos for patients who received Seli as a bridging therapy versus 9 mos for Seli use for other reasons rather than as a bridge. Overall, Seli-based regimens showed promising responses even in this heavily pretreated population. Our analysis suggests that Seli-based regimens lead to similar outcomes among RRMM patients with del17p, OHRC, and standard-risk cytogenetics. This contrasts with previously reported outcomes using combinations of novel therapies in this population, where the del17p patients often have a poorer prognosis. Interestingly, our data suggest that Seli is a particularly effective bridging modality for patients preparing for CAR-T cell therapies in our population. Further investigation into this population is warranted, including in earlier lines of therapy, in hopes of seeing a more durable response.
Summary
An updated survival analysis was conducted for the Phase II study O‐12‐M1 of melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) ...with two or more prior lines of therapy (including bortezomib and lenalidomide). Partial response or better was seen in 31%. After a 46‐month median overall survival (OS) follow‐up, melflufen plus dexamethasone had a median OS of 20·7 months (75th percentile OS, 47·5 months). The median time‐to‐next treatment for melflufen plus dexamethasone was 7·9 months. In summary, melflufen plus dexamethasone resulted in sustained long‐term clinical benefit in patients with RRMM.
Abstract The randomized, phase 2 GRIFFIN study (NCT02874742) evaluated daratumumab plus lenalidomide/bortezomib/dexamethasone (D-RVd) in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). ...We present final post hoc analyses (median follow-up, 49.6 months) of clinically relevant subgroups, including patients with high-risk cytogenetic abnormalities (HRCAs) per revised definition (del17p, t4;14, t14;16, t14;20, and/or gain/amp1q21). Patients received 4 induction cycles (D-RVd/RVd), high-dose therapy/transplant, 2 consolidation cycles (D-RVd/RVd), and lenalidomide±daratumumab maintenance (≤ 2 years). Minimal residual disease–negativity (10 −5 ) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd in patients ≥ 65 years (67.9% vs 17.9%), with HRCAs (54.8% vs 32.4%), and with gain/amp(1q21) (61.8% vs 28.6%). D-RVd showed a trend toward improved progression-free survival versus RVd (hazard ratio 95% confidence interval) in patients ≥ 65 years (0.29 0.06–1.48), with HRCAs (0.38 0.14–1.01), and with gain/amp(1q21) (0.42 0.14–1.27). In the functional high-risk subgroup (not MRD negative at the end of consolidation), the hazard ratio was 0.82 (0.35–1.89). Among patients ≥ 65 years, grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates were higher for D-RVd versus RVd (88.9% vs 77.8%), as were TEAEs leading to discontinuation of ≥ 1 treatment component (37.0% vs 25.9%). One D-RVd patient died due to an unrelated TEAE. These results support the addition of daratumumab to RVd in transplant-eligible patients with high-risk NDMM.
PDF
