TPS2699
Background: Immunotherapy has transformed the treatment of NSCLC and other solid tumors, such as SCCHN and UBC. However, even with standard-of-care anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapies, few patients ...achieve durable benefit even when PD-L1 is overexpressed. IO102-IO103 is a potentially first-in-class, dual-antigen, immune-modulatory therapy that stimulates T cells to target tumoral immune escape via key checkpoint molecules IDO and PD-L1. It is thought that activating IDO/PD-L1-specific T cells in cancer patients through vaccination may support anticancer immunity by restricting immunosuppressive signaling and restoring the tumor immune microenvironment to render the tumor more susceptible to anti-PD-1 blockade. Thus there is a rationale for combining IO102-IO103 with anti-PD-1 therapy in the first-line treatment of metastatic tumors, such as NSCLC, SCCHN, or UBC. Combined IO102-IO103 and anti-PD-1 therapy (nivolumab) has already shown a robust signal of clinical activity (overall response rate ORR, 80%; complete response rate CRR, 43%; median progression-free survival PFS, 26 months) and was well tolerated with minimal added toxicity to nivolumab in a Phase 1/2 study of anti-PD1-naïve patients with metastatic melanoma (Kjeldsen, et al. Nat Med 2021). Methods: This is a Phase 2, international, multicenter (US and Europe), non-comparative, open-label, multi-arm (basket) trial (EudraCT No. 2021-003026-69; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT05077709). Patients with recurrent, unresectable or metastatic solid tumors in 3 indications and no prior treatments for metastatic disease are being enrolled: NSCLC with a PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) ≥50% (Arm A); SCCHN with PD-L1 Combined Positive Scores (CPS) ≥20 (Arm B); or UBC with PD-L1 CPS ≥10 and not eligible for platinum-containing chemotherapy (Arm C). All patients, ̃30 in each arm, will receive 3-week cycles of IO102-IO103 (85-85 µg on Day D 1 and 8 of Cycle 1 and 2, and D1 thereafter) subcutaneously plus pembrolizumab (200 mg on D1) intravenously, for up to 2 years. Primary endpoints are ORR by RECIST v1.1 or 6-month PFS rate by investigator assessment (to be analyzed either 6 months after last patient started treatment or after target ORR is achieved, whichever is earliest). Secondary endpoints include PFS, duration of response, complete response rate, disease control rate, time to response, overall survival, and safety. Exploratory endpoints include biomarker and immune marker correlative studies, and PFS by iRECIST. The trial will assess the opportunity for a positive risk–benefit based on 2 efficacy boundaries for the ORR and 6-month PFS rate in each arm, with cohort expansion permitted if a clinically relevant efficacy signal is observed. Clinical trial information: EudraCT No. 2021-003026-69; ClinicalTrials.gov No. NCT05077709.
5047
Background: We previously reported the PSA response rate and toxicity data of a phase 1/2 single-arm, multi-institutional trial to examine the efficacy and safety of co-administration of ENZ + ...CAB in mCRPC without prior chemotherapy given in the mCRPC setting. We found that full doses of ENZ (160 mg daily) and CAB (25 mg/m2) were tolerable and that 80% of pts had PSA decline ≥50%. Here, we report the final analysis of ORR, rPFS and OS. Methods: We calculated the ORR (CR/PR) and 95% confidence intervals using the Clopper-Pearson Exact Method. We determined response according to RECIST 1.1 for measurable disease and Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria for non-measurable (bone) disease. We estimated median rPFS (time from the study entry to the time of confirmed progression (radiographic or clinical) or death) and OS (time from the study entry to death) with 95% confidence intervals using the Kaplan-Meier method; data cutoff was 6/1/22. Statistical analysis was performed using R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Results: 37 pts consented and 35 were included in the efficacy analyses (1 withdrew consent, 1 was lost to follow up before efficacy assessment); 7/35 (20%) had prior exposure to chemotherapy given for mHSPC and 9/35 (25%) had prior exposure to abiraterone (ABI), including 2/35 (25.7%) with prior exposure to chemotherapy and ABI. 28 pts had at least one on-study trial imaging study and were evaluable for ORR. After a median follow-up of 23.7 (range: 4.9 to 62.4) months (mo), median OS was 25.1 mo (95%CI 19.4 - 37.6 mo). Median PSA PFS was 11.9 mo (95%CI 9.2 - 15.4), and median rPFS was 22.2 mo (95%CI 13.6 - 25.2). PK assessments revealed that ENZ decreased CAB levels: CAB (monotherapy) Cmax 178.9ng*h/ml vs CAB (in the presence of ENZ) Cmax 85.5 ng*h/ml (p<0.05). Conclusions: The combination of ENZ+CAB in this heterogeneous mCRPC population, which included about a quarter of pts with prior chemotherapy and ABI exposure, resulted in an OS of 22.5 mo comparing favorably with the OS of 25.2 mo seen in the FIRSTANA trial of single agent CAB in docetaxel naïve men, 15.1 mo post chemotherapy in the TROPIC trial, and 13.6 mo in the post-docetaxel, post-ABI in the CARD trial. Of note, the rPFS in this trial was 22.2 months compared to 5.1 months in FIRSTANA suggesting improved efficacy; however cross-trial comparisons are discouraged due to several confounders. Chemo-hormonal therapies and prognostic/predictive biomarkers warrant further study in mCRPC. Clinical trial information: NCT02522715 . Table: see text
To evaluate the role of postchemotherapy surgery in patients with nonseminomatous germ cell tumors arising from the anterior mediastinum.
Thirty-two patients with nonseminoma arising from a ...mediastinal primary site were treated on a clinical trial at our center, and they underwent postchemotherapy surgery. The results of postchemotherapy surgical resection, frequency of viable tumor found during postchemotherapy surgery, and prognostic factors for survival were assessed.
Complete resection of all gross residual disease was achieved in 27 patients (84%). Histologic analysis of resected residua postchemotherapy revealed viable tumor in 66%, teratoma in 22%, and necrosis in 12% of the specimens. Viable tumor included embryonal carcinoma, choriocarcinoma, yolk sac carcinoma, seminoma, and teratoma with malignant transformation to nongerm cell histology (eg, sarcoma). Clinical characteristics associated with a shorter survival after surgery included the presence of viable tumor in a resected specimen (P =.003) and more than one site resected during surgery (P =.06). There were no statistically significant differences in survival for patients who underwent surgical resection with normal markers compared with patients with elevated serum tumor markers (P =.33). A trend toward shorter survival was found in patients with increasing tumor markers before surgery compared with patients with normal and declining serum tumor markers (P =.09).
Surgical resection of residual mass after chemotherapy plays an integral role in the management of patients with primary mediastinal nonseminoma. Teratoma and viable tumor were found in the majority of resected residua after chemotherapy. Because patients who undergo conventional salvage chemotherapy programs rarely achieve long-term disease-free status, selected patients with elevated markers after chemotherapy are considered candidates for surgical resection.
In an exploratory analysis, we investigated the association between programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1), tumor mutational burden (TMB), T-cell-inflamed gene expression profile (TcellinfGEP), and ...stromal signature with outcomes of pembrolizumab in urothelial carcinoma (UC).
Patients with advanced UC received first-line pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks in the single-arm phase II KEYNOTE-052 trial (NCT02335424) and salvage pembrolizumab 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (paclitaxel/docetaxel/vinflunine) in the randomized phase III KEYNOTE-045 trial (NCT02256436). The association of each biomarker (continuous variable) with objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was evaluated using logistic regression (ORR) and Cox PH (PFS, OS), adjusted for ECOG PS; nominal P values were calculated without multiplicity adjustment (one-sided, pembrolizumab; two-sided, chemotherapy). Significance was prespecified at α = 0.05.
In KEYNOTE-052, PD-L1, TMB, and TcellinfGEP were significantly associated with improved outcomes; stromal signature was significantly associated with worse outcomes. In KEYNOTE-045, although findings for TMB and TcellinfGEP with pembrolizumab were consistent with those of KEYNOTE-052, PD-L1 was not significantly associated with improved outcomes, nor was stromal signature associated with worse outcomes with pembrolizumab; chemotherapy was not associated with outcomes in a consistent manner for any of the biomarkers. Hazard ratio (HR) estimates at prespecified cutoffs showed an advantage for pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy regardless of PD-L1 or TMB, with a trend toward lower HRs in the combined positive score ≥10 and the TMB ≥175 mutation/exome subgroup. For TcellinfGEP, PFS and OS HRs were lower in the TcellinfGEP-nonlow subgroup regardless of treatment.
Multiple biomarkers characterizing the tumor microenvironment may help predict response to pembrolizumab monotherapy in UC, and potential clinical utility of these biomarkers may be context-dependent.
3001
Background: FOR46, a fully human antibody (ab) conjugated to monomethyl auristatin E (MMAE), targets a tumor selective epitope of CD46, which is highly expressed in mCRPC and treatment-emergent ...small cell neuroendocrine cancer (t-SCNC). CD46 is enriched in tumor cells upon treatment with androgen signaling inhibitors (ASI). Following dose escalation (Phase 1a), dose expansion was undertaken in 2 cohorts (Phase 1b): 1) Pts with de novo or t-SCNC and 2) pts with mCRPC without a t-SCNC component. Pts with adenocarcinoma enrolled in dose escalation and expansion are included in this analysis. Methods: Eligible pts had mCRPC, with progression on at least 1 ASI, with no prior chemotherapy for CRPC. Phase 1a pts received FOR46 0.1-3.0 mg/kg IV Q3 weeks (wks). The primary objectives in phase 1a were to assess adverse effects (AEs) and select the phase 1b dose; and in phase 1b to assess efficacy. For phase 1b, tumor biopsy in the CRPC setting for assignment to the 2 cohorts was required. CD46 expression was not required for inclusion in the expansion cohort, but was evaluated using a non-epitope specific CD46 polyclonal ab. Histology and CD46 expression were centrally reviewed. Results: Thirty-three pts were enrolled in phase 1a and 10 in phase 1b (including 6 treated in ph1a at the expansion dose or higher). Overall, 36 pts were treated at doses > 1.2 mg/kg. Following excess toxicity in pts with body mass indices > 30 (3 of 3 with Gr 4 neutropenia and 1 of 3 with Gr 3 fatigue at 2.4 mg/kg), further dosing was calculated using adjusted body weight (AJBW) rather than actual weight, allowing escalation to 3.0 mg/kg. The 2.7 mg/kg dose by AJBW was determined to be the MTD and phase 1b dose. The most common AEs at the 2.7 mg/kg dose were neutropenia (77% Gr 3 or 4), infusion reactions (37%, all < Gr 2), fatigue (31%, all < Gr 2) and peripheral neuropathy (24%, all < Gr 2)). Fourteen of 31 evaluable pts (45.2%) at > 1.2 mg/kg achieved a PSA
50
response with 10 (32.3%) confirmed. Five pts were not evaluable for PSA response; 3 had no post-baseline PSA and 2 had baseline PSA < 1 ng/mL. The median duration of confirmed PSA
50
response is >16 wks (range 6-48+ wks, with 4 ongoing at 12, 24, 25 and 48 wks). 18 pts had measurable lesions; 8 of 18 (44.4%) had tumor regression, with 4 (22.2%) confirmed partial responses (PR). The median duration of response is > 14 wks (range 9 -31+ weeks with 2 ongoing at 13 and 31 wks). Eight pts were evaluable for CD46 expression with a median H-score of 245 (range 0-300). Two pts with PRs had H-scores of 15 and 300; 4 with confirmed PSA
50
had H-scores of 10, 15, 40 and 300. Conclusions: FOR46, a novel ADC targeting CD46, demonstrates clinical activity in mCRPC pts, with an acceptable safety profile, similar to other MMAE-containing ADCs. FOR46 merits further investigation in pts with mCRPC, alone and in combination with agents that enhance CD46 expression. Clinical trial information: NCT03575819.
TPS5099
Background: Approximately 30% of patients (pts) treated with definitive surgical and/or radiation therapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma develop biochemical recurrence (BCR). The ...optimal time to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for such patients is controversial and depends on patient and provider preference, absolute PSA value, and PSA doubling time (PSADT), which has been associated with time to metastasis. Because the time from BCR to metastasis can be long in many cases, strategies allowing pts to avoid ADT while extending metastasis-free survival are desirable. Prior studies have shown that a high tumor neoantigen load correlates with response to anti-PD(L)1. We hypothesized that PARP inhibitor-induced genomic instability may sensitize tumors to anti-PD(L)1 through: i) increasing mutational burden and subsequent tumor neoantigen formation, and/or ii) through activation of other immunogenic pathways (e.g. the STING pathway). This trial investigates an ADT-sparing approach for men predicted to have high neoantigen load and who have BCR prostate cancer. Methods: This is a phase 2 clinical trial testing durvalumab (1500 mg IV every 4 weeks) and olaparib (300 mg PO twice a day) (one cycle = 4 weeks) in men with BCR (PSADT≤10 months) whose tumors are predicted to have high neoantigen load based on: biallelic CDK12 mutations (Cohort A), mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (Cohort B), or loss of function mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes (Cohort C). Cohorts A and B will receive 3 cycles of durvalumab followed by 3 cycles of the combination of durvalumab and olaparib. Given the proven efficacy of olaparib in prostate cancer patient whose tumors posses an HRR gene mutation, Cohort C will receive 6 full cycles of the combination. Ten patients will be enrolled in each cohort (total n = 30) at two collaborating sites. This study was designed to provide preliminary efficacy data across eligible cohorts, with a primary objective of estimating the proportion of pts with an undetectable PSA at 12 months within each cohort. Secondary objectives include safety, proportion of patients with ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline and quality of life measures. Correlative studies will assess blood and tissue molecular biomarkers for association with outcomes. The study is open with two patients enrolled at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04336943.
Abstract only
TPS202
Background: Approximately 30% of patients (pts) treated with definitive surgical and/or radiation therapy for localized prostate adenocarcinoma develop biochemical recurrence ...(BCR). The optimal time to initiate androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) for such patients is controversial and depends on patient and provider preference, absolute PSA value, and PSA doubling time (PSADT), which has been associated with time to metastasis. Because the time from BCR to metastasis can be long in many cases, strategies allowing pts to avoid ADT while extending metastasis-free survival are desirable. Prior studies have shown that a high tumor neoantigen load correlates with response to anti-PD(L)1. We hypothesized that PARP inhibitor-induced genomic instability may sensitize tumors to anti-PD(L)1 through: i) increasing mutational burden and subsequent tumor neoantigen formation, and/or ii) through activation of other immunogenic pathways (e.g. the STING pathway). This trial investigates an ADT-sparing approach for men predicted to have high neoantigen load and who have BCR prostate cancer. Methods: This is a phase 2 clinical trial testing durvalumab (1500 mg IV every 4 weeks) and olaparib (300 mg PO twice a day) (one cycle = 4 weeks) in men with BCR (PSADT≤10 months) whose tumors are predicted to have high neoantigen load based on: biallelic CDK12 mutations (Cohort A), mismatch repair deficiency (MMRd)/high microsatellite instability (MSI-H) (Cohort B), or loss of function mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes (Cohort C). Cohorts A and B will receive 3 cycles of durvalumab followed by 3 cycles of the combination of durvalumab and olaparib. Given the proven efficacy of olaparib in prostate cancer patient whose tumors posses an HRR gene mutation, Cohort C will receive 6 full cycles of the combination. Ten patients will be enrolled in each cohort (total n = 30) at two collaborating sites. This study was designed to provide preliminary efficacy data across eligible cohorts, with a primary objective of estimating the proportion of pts with an undetectable PSA at 12 months within each cohort. Secondary objectives include safety, proportion of patients with ≥50% decline in PSA from baseline and quality of life measures. Correlative studies will assess blood and tissue molecular biomarkers for association with outcomes. The study is open with two patients enrolled at the time of abstract submission. Clinical trial information: NCT04336943.
Abstract only
4508
Background: Pembro was approvedfor cisplatin-ineligible patients with untreated advanced UC based on initial results of the phase 2 KEYNOTE-052 study (NCT02335424), which showed an ...ORR of 29%. Updated results after up to 5 years of follow-up are presented. Methods: KEYNOTE-052 is a single-arm, multi-site, open-label trial. Patients had advanced or metastatic UC, were cisplatin ineligible (criteria: ECOG PS 2, CrCl ≥30 to ̃60 mL/min, grade ≥2 peripheral neuropathy/hearing loss, NYHA class III heart failure), and had not previously received chemotherapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Patients received pembro 200 mg IV Q3W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal, or 24 mo of therapy, whichever occurred first. PD-L1 status was determined by combined positive score (CPS, number of PD-L1–staining cells tumor cells, lymphocytes, macrophages divided by the total number of viable tumor cells, multiplied by 100); PD-L1–positive was CPS ≥10. The primary end point was confirmed ORR (RECIST v1.1, independent central review). Key secondary end points were duration of response (DOR), OS, and safety. Results: Among 370 enrolled patients, median age was 74 y, 315 (85.1%) had visceral disease, and 43 (11.6%) completed 24 mo of therapy. Median time from enrollment to data cutoff (Sep 26, 2020) was 56.3 mo (range, 51.2-65.3) for all patients and 56.0 mo (range, 51.4-65.2) for the 110 patients (29.7%) with CPS ≥10. Confirmed ORR for all patients was 28.9% (95% CI, 24.3-33.8); complete response, 9.5% (n=35); partial response, 19.5% (n=72). Median DOR was 33.4 mo (range, 1.4+ to 60.7+); 44.8% and 39.4% of patients had DOR ≥36 and ≥48 mo, (Kaplan-Meier estimates). Median OS was 11.3 mo (95% CI, 9.7-13.1); 24- and 36-mo OS rates were 31.5% and 22.1%. Patients with CPS ≥10 had better outcomes than patients with CPS <10 (Table). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 67.3% of patients; 21.1% of treatment-related AEs were grade ≥3, including 1 death (myositis). Conclusions: After up to 5 y of follow-up, pembro continued to elicit clinically meaningful, durable antitumor activity in cisplatin-ineligible patients with advanced UC. These effects were more pronounced in patients with CPS ≥10. Clinical trial information: NCT02335424. Table: see text
Bladder preservation therapy is an effective treatment for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). In this study we treated noncystectomy candidates with daily radiation and weekly paclitaxel for ...7 weeks. Patients whose tumors showed her2/neu overexpression were additionally treated with weekly trastuzumab.
Sixty-eight evaluable patients were treated with radiation therapy and either paclitaxel + trastuzumab (group 1) or paclitaxel alone (group 2). Groups were assigned on the basis of her2/neu immunohistochemistry results. Patients received 1.8-Gy fractions to a total dose of 64.8 Gy. The primary endpoint of the study was treatment-related toxicity, and secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, protocol completion rate, and survival.
A total of 20 evaluable patients were treated in group 1 and 46 patients in group 2. Acute treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were observed in 7 of 20 patients in group 1 (35%) and 14 of 46 patients in group 2 (30.4%). Protocol therapy was completed by 60% (group 1) and 74% (group 2) of patients. Most incompletions were due to toxicity, and the majority of AEs were gastrointestinal, including 1 grade 5 AE (group 1). Two other deaths (both in group 2) were unrelated to protocol therapy. No unexpected cardiac, hematologic, or other toxicities were observed. The CR rate at 1 year was 72% for group 1 and 68% for group 2.
In patients with muscle-invasive UC who are not candidates for cystectomy, daily radiation combined with paclitaxel is an effective treatment strategy with a high completion rate and moderate toxicity. In patients with her2/neu-positive tumors, a group generally considered to have worse outcomes, the addition of trastuzumab appears to result in comparable efficacy and toxicity. Further biomarker-driven trials should be undertaken in advancing treatment of this challenging disease.
Abstract
Background monarchE, a phase 3, open-label, randomized study evaluating endocrine therapy with or without abemaciclib in patients with node positive, HR+, HER2-, high risk early breast ...cancer, resulted in a statistically significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) at a pre-planned interim analysis. Ki-67, a marker of cellular proliferation in breast cancer, was used in addition to other clinical and/or pathological features to identify patients whose cancer may be at higher risk of recurrence. A key secondary endpoint was to evaluate IDFS in patients with high (≥20%) Ki-67 tumors. Methods Patients with ≥4 positive nodes, or 1-3 nodes and either grade 3 disease, tumor size ≥5 cm, or central Ki-67 ≥20% were eligible for monarchE. Ki-67 was centrally assessed for all eligible patients with suitable untreated breast tissue using a standardized kit produced by Agilent/Dako (MIB-1). A sequential gatekeeping strategy was utilized to test the statistical significance in IDFS for patients with high Ki-67 tumors. Data on this subgroup are presented. Results Primary outcome results in the ITT population are presented separately and resulted in a significant 28.7% reduction in the risk of developing invasive disease with abemaciclib plus ET versus ET alone (HR = 0.713; 95% CI = 0.583, 0.871). Of the 5637 patients enrolled in monarchE, 4425 (78.5%) had Ki-67 samples eligible for testing. Of those tested, 2498 patients (56.5%) had Ki-67 ≥20% (Ki-67H). Results from the Ki-67H population are presented separately and showed that abemaciclib plus ET demonstrated superior IDFS versus ET alone with a 30.9% reduction in the risk of invasive disease (p=.0111; HR = 0.691; 95% CI = 0.519, 0.920). There was an absolute improvement of 4.5% in IDFS rate at 2 years (91.6% in the abemaciclib arm and 87.1% in the control arm). An additional planned analysis was performed evaluating efficacy in 2003 patients with high Ki-67 tumors enrolled in cohort 1 (patients with ≥4 positive nodes or 1-3 nodes and either tumor size ≥5 cm and/or grade 3 disease). The IDFS treatment benefit in this group was statistically significant with a HR of 0.643 (95% CI = 0.475, 0.872) corresponding to a 35.7% reduction in the risk of developing invasive disease. Two-year IDFS rates in this group were 91.3% in the abemaciclib group and 86.1% in the control arm, representing a 5.2% absolute improvement at 2 years. A clinically meaningful improvement was also observed in distant relapse-free survival (DRFS) in both populations. Baseline characteristics were balanced across arms in both Ki-67H populations. An exploratory analysis was conducted evaluating patients in cohort 1 with low Ki-67 (<20%) and will be presented.
Conclusion This represents the first time a prespecified threshold of ≥20% for Ki-67 has been used to prospectively evaluate the utility of Ki-67 in a phase III registration trial with a standardized assay. There was a statistically significant improvement in IDFS for patients with high Ki-67 tumors across the ITT population (HR = 0.691) and in cohort 1 (HR = 0.643). These results suggest that Ki-67 ≥20% is an additional clinicopathological feature that can be used in conjunction with high risk features of nodal involvement, tumor size, and grade, to select patients with a higher risk of recurrence who may benefit from treatment with abemaciclib in the adjuvant setting. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03155997
Ki-67H Ki-67H Cohort 1EndpointAbemaciclib + ETN=1262ET aloneN=1236Abemaciclib + ETN=1017ET aloneN=986IDFS# events, n (%)82 (6.5)115 (9.3)71 (7.0)106 (10.8)log rank Pvalue, HR (95% CI)p=.0111 0.691 (0.519, 0.920)p=.00420.643 (0.475, 0.872)Rate (%) at 2-years (95% CI)91.6(89.4, 93.4)87.1(84.3, 89.5)91.3(88.9, 93.2)86.1(83.1, 88.7)DRFS# events, n (%)65 (5.2)102 (8.3)56 (5.5)96 (9.7)log rank Pvalue,HR (95% CI)p=.0018 0.609 (0.445, 0.833)p=.00040.554 (0.397, 0.773)Rate (%) at 2 years (95% CI)93.6(91.6, 95.1)88.5(85.7, 90.7)93.3(91.2, 95.0)87.384.4, 89.8)
Citation Format: Nadia Harbeck, Stephen Johnston, Peter Fasching, Miguel Martin, Masakazu Toi, Priya Rastogi, Chuangui Song, David Molthrop, Jacqueline Vuky, Toshinari Yamashita, Georgina Garnica Jaliffe, Mahmut Gumus, Desiree Headley, Ran Wei, Susana Barriga, Maria Munoz, Michael Method, Valerie Andre, Hans Kreipe, Joyce O'Shaughnessy. High Ki-67 as a biomarker for identifying patients with high risk early breast cancer treated in monarchE abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-01.
PDF
