To investigate the feasibility and the clinical response of a stereotactic single-dose radiation treatment for liver tumors.
Between April 1997 and September 1999, a stereotactic single-dose ...radiation treatment of 60 liver tumors (four primary tumors, 56 metastases) in 37 patients was performed. Patients were positioned in an individually shaped vacuum pillow. The applied dose was escalated from 14 to 26 Gy (reference point), with the 80% isodose surrounding the planning target volume. Median tumor size was 10 cm(3) (range, 1 to 132 cm(3)). The morbidity, clinical outcome, laboratory findings, and response as seen on computed tomography (CT) scan were evaluated.
Follow-up data could be obtained from 55 treated tumors (35 patients). The median follow-up period was 5.7 months (range, 1.0 to 26.1 months; mean, 9.5 months). The treatment was well tolerated by all patients. There were no major side effects. Fifty-four (98%) of 55 tumors were locally controlled after 6 weeks at the initial follow-up based on the CT findings (22 cases of stable disease, 28 partial responses, and four complete responses). After a dose-escalating and learning phase, the actuarial local tumor control rate was 81% at 18 months after therapy. A total of 12 local failures were observed during follow-up. So far, the longest local tumor control is 26.1 months.
Stereotactic single-dose radiation therapy is a feasible method for the treatment of singular inoperable liver metastases with the potential of a high local tumor control rate and low morbidity.
Purpose: Patients with liver metastases might benefit from high-dose conformal radiation therapy. A high accuracy of repositioning and a reduction of target movement are necessary for such an ...approach. The set-up accuracy of patients with liver metastases treated with stereotactic single dose radiation was evaluated.
Methods and Materials: Twenty-four patients with liver metastases were treated with single dose radiation therapy on 26 occasions using a self-developed stereotactic frame. Liver movement was reduced by abdominal pressure. The effectiveness was evaluated under fluoroscopy. CT scans were performed on the planning day and directly before treatment. Representative reference marks were chosen and the coordinates were calculated. In addition, the target displacement was quantitatively evaluated after treatment.
Results: Diaphragmal movement was reduced to median 7 mm (range: 3–13 mm). The final set-up accuracy of the body was limited to all of median 1.8 mm in latero-lateral direction (range: 0.3–5.0 mm) and 2.0 mm in anterior-posterior direction (0.8–3.8 mm). Deviations of the body in cranio-caudal direction were always less than the thickness of one CT slice (<5 mm). However, a repositioning was necessary in 16 occasions. The final target shift was median 1.6 mm (0.2–7.0 mm) in latero-lateral and 2.3 mm in anterior-posterior direction (0.0–6.3 mm). The median shift in cranio-caudal direction was 4.4 mm (0.0–10.0 mm).
Conclusions: In patients with liver metastases, a high set-up accuracy of the body and the target can be achieved. This allows a high-dose focal radiotherapy of these lesions. However, a control CT scan should be performed directly before therapy to confirm set-up accuracy and possibly prompt necessary corrections.
Large skull-base meningiomas are difficult to treat due to their proximity or adherence to critical structures. We analyzed the long-term results of patients with skull-base meningiomas treated by a ...new approach with high-precision fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy.
One hundred eighty-nine patients with benign meningiomas were treated with conformal fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy between 1985 and 1998. Patients were undergoing a course of radiotherapy either as primary treatment, following subtotal resection, or for recurrent disease. The median target volume was 52.5 mL (range, 5.2 to 370 mL). The mean radiation dose was 56.8 Gy (+/- 4.4 Gy). Follow-up examinations, including magnetic resonance imaging, were performed at 6-month intervals thereafter.
The median follow-up period was 35 months (range, 3 months to 12 years). Overall actuarial survival for patients with World Health Organization (WHO) grade I meningiomas was 97% after 5 years and 96% after 10 years. Local tumor failure was observed in three of 180 patients with WHO grade I tumors and was significantly higher in two of nine patients with WHO grade II tumors. A volume reduction of more than 50% was observed in 26 patients (14%). Preexisting cranial nerve symptoms resolved completely in 28% of the patients. Clinically significant treatment-induced toxicity was seen in 1.6% of the patients. No treatment-related deaths occurred.
The results of this study demonstrate that fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy is safe and effective in the therapy of subtotally resected or unresectable meningiomas. The overall morbidity and incidence subacute and late side effects of this conformal radiotherapy approach were low.
Objective: To investigate the feasibility of using intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for complex-shaped benign meningiomas of the skull base and report clinical experience.
Methods: Twenty ...patients with benign skull-base meningiomas WHO°I (histopathologically proven in 16/20) were treated with IMRT between June 1998 and August 1999. Each tumor was complex in shape and adherent to, or encompassed, organs at risk (cranial nerves, optic apparatus, and brainstem). All patients, immobilized in a customized head mask integrated into a stereotactic system, were planned on an inverse treatment planning system using 5 or 7 coplanar, equidistant beams and 5 intensity steps. Each treatment plan was verified extensively before treatment. Follow-up with MRI and clinical examination was performed at 6 and 18 weeks and every 6 months thereafter.
Results: Target volumes ranged from 27 to 278 cc (median: 108 cc). Mean dose in 32 fractions ranged between 55.8 and 58.2 Gy. At median follow-up of 36 months (range: 31–43 months), pre-existing neurologic symptoms improved in 12/20 (60%), remained stable in 7/20 (35%), and worsened in 1 (5%) patient. Radiographic follow-up revealed significant tumor shrinkage 6 weeks post-IMRT in 2 patients and partial remission in 3 more patients at 9–17 months; other tumor volumes remained stable. There was no radiation-induced peritumoral edema, increase in tumor size, or new onset of neurologic deficits. Transient acute treatment side effects included nausea and vomiting and single occurrences of conjunctivitis/increased tearing and serous tympanitis.
Conclusion: IMRT in the treatment of central nervous system meningiomas is feasible and safe, offering highly conformal irradiation for complex-shaped skull-base tumors while sparing adjacent critical structures. If the tumor remissions seen here are found in the ongoing treatments, IMRT may be considered the treatment of choice for inoperable or subtotally resected meningiomas and for otherwise difficult-to-treat, complex-shaped tumors of the central nervous system adjacent to critical structures, with the potential of dose escalation for malignant tumors.
Evaluation of the treatment outcome after radiosurgery (RS) alone or in combination with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) with special attention to prescribed dose and its influence on local control ...and survival.
Between September 1984 and January 1997, 236 patients with 311 brain metastases treated with radiosurgery met the following inclusion criteria: one to three brain metastases per patient; no previous WBRT; and Kamofsky performance status (KPS) > or = 50%. One hundred fifty-eight patients treated only with RS received a median dose of 20 Gy prescribed to the 80% isodose line; 78 patients received RS with a median dose of 15 Gy/80% and an additional course of WBRT.
For the entire series, overall median survival was 5.5 months, with control of CNS disease achieved in 92% of the treated brain metastases; the results were not significantly different between patients treated by RS with or without WBRT. However, in patients without evidence of extracranial disease, median survival was increased for patients who received WBRT (15.4 vs 8.3 months; P=.08). Additionally, there was a suggestion that increased doses for patients treated with RS only resulted in improved outcome. Four lesions were suspicious for radiation necrosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); in one of the four lesions, radiation necrosis was confirmed histologically. The incidence of transient low-grade toxicity was 18%; symptoms could be treated by the temporary administration of steroids.
RS is an effective, noninvasive means of controlling brain metastases when used alone or in combination with WBRT. There is a trend for superior local control and especially in patients without extracranial disease for superior survival when RS is used in conjunction with WBRT. Randomized trials would seem to be warranted, comparing the benefit of RS with or without additional WBRT.
An ideal vision of modern medicine includes tumor surgery with the human body remaining completely intact. A noninvasive therapy could avoid infections and scar formation; it would require less ...anesthesia, reduce recovery time, and possibly also reduce costs. This study investigated whether human breast cancer can be effectively treated with a novel combination of image guidance and energy delivery, noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided focused ultrasound (FUS). We have developed a FUS therapy unit guided by MRI for the treatment of human breast tumors in a clinical 1.5 T MR scanner. With interactive target segmentation on MRI, defined volumes could be noninvasively treated in a single session with on-line MR temperature control. The ultrasound waves were focused through the intact skin and resulted in the localized thermal tissue ablation at a maximum temperature of 70 degrees C. The therapy principle was first demonstrated in sheep breast in vivo and was then applied in a patient with core biopsy-proven invasive breast cancer 5 days before breast-conserving surgery. MRI proved suitable to delineate the breast cancer, served as stereotactic treatment planning platform, and delineated the FUS-related tissue changes such as interruption of tumor blood flow. Furthermore, MRI localized the hot spot in the tumor and measured temperature elevation during the treatment. This allowed us to monitor the efficacy and safety of FUS therapy. Immunohistochemistry of the resected specimen demonstrated that FUS homogeneously induced lethal and sublethal tumor damage with consecutive up-regulation of p53 and loss of proliferative activity. This effect was realized without anesthesia and damage to the surrounding healthy tissue or systemic effects. Overall, our results show that noninvasive MRI-guided therapy of breast cancer is feasible and effective. Thus, MRI-guided FUS may represent a new strategy for the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or palliative treatment in selected breast cancer patients and in patients with other soft-tissue tumors.
Purpose: Conformal and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) plans for 9 patients were compared based on characterization of plan quality and effects on the oncology department.
Methods and ...Materials: These clinical cases, treated originally with conformal radiotherapy (CRT), required extraordinary effort to produce conformal treatment plans using nonmodulated, shaped noncoplanar fields with multileaf collimators (MLCs). IMRT plans created for comparison included rotational treatments with slit collimator, and fixed-field MLC treatments using equispaced coplanar, and noncoplanar fields. Plans were compared based upon target coverage, target conformality, dose homogeneity, monitor units (MU), user-interactive planning time, and treatment delivery time. The results were subjected to a statistical analysis.
Results: IMRT increased target coverage an average of 36% and conformality by 10%. Where dose escalation was a goal, IMRT increased mean dose by 4–6 Gy and target coverage by 19% with the same degree of conformality. Rotational IMRT was slightly superior to fixed-field IMRT. All IMRT techniques increased integral dose and target dose heterogeneity. IMRT planning times were significantly less, whereas MU increased significantly; estimated delivery times were similar.
Conclusion: IMRT techniques increase dose and target coverage while continuing to spare organs-at-risk, and can be delivered in a time frame comparable to other sophisticated techniques.
The role of radiochemotherapy in the treatment of primary glioblastoma multiforme is still discussed controversially. To evaluate the feasibility and toxicity of irradiation and concomitant ...administration of 50 mg/m(2) temozolomide in patients with primary malignant glioma, this phase I/II study was conducted.
53 Patients with histologically confirmed WHO grade IV malignant glioma were enrolled into the study. All patients were treated with radiation therapy up to a total dose of 60 Gy using conventional fractionation of 5 x 2.0 Gy/week. Temozolomide was administered orally each therapy day at a dose of 50 mg/m(2).
Prior to radiochemotherapy, complete resection (n = 14), subtotal resection (n = 22) or a biopsy (n = 17) of the tumor was performed. The median time interval between surgery and radiochemotherapy was 21 days. Treatment-related toxicity was very mild. Acute toxicity > grade 2 was observed in one patient who developed grade 4 hemotoxicity. Minor side effects of chemotherapy included nausea and vomiting. No severe late effects were observed. Median progression-free and overall survival were 8 and 19 months, respectively. The overall survival rate was 72% at 1 and 26% at 2 years. Age and extent of surgery significantly influenced survival.
The combination of temozolomide plus radiation therapy is feasible and safe in terms of toxicity. Overall survival times were relatively long compared to survival times reported for radiotherapy alone. The application of 50 mg/m(2) of temozolomide can be performed throughout the whole time course without interruption due to side effects and might largely contribute to the prolonged overall survival. Further evaluation is warranted as to which dose of temozolomide is optimal with regard to tumor response and toxicity.
This paper aims at identifying the specific legal requirements concerning data security and data protection of patient health data that apply to a cross-institutional electronic patient record (EPR) ...and describes possible solutions for meeting these requirements. In Germany, the legal framework for such records provide that disclosure of patient health information to physicians of third-party institutions is only allowed in case that it is necessary for the joint treatment of the patient, i.e. in case of a “treatment connection”. As a first step, the functionality of a remote-access architecture was proven allowing a one-way connection between the EPR systems of two health institutions in Germany, which jointly treat tumor patients. Besides, a signature system model for ensuring the integrity and authenticity of medical documents was developed and implemented in the existing information system architecture of the University Medical Center of Heidelberg. Especially in Germany, the legal framework for cross-institutional EPRs is very complex and has a considerable influence on the development and implementation of cross-institutional EPRs. However, its introduction is thought to be valuable, since a cross-institutional EPR will improve communication within shared care processes, and thus improve the quality of patient care.
