With intensified treatment leading to longer survival, complications of therapy for brain tumours are more frequently observed. Regarding radiation therapy, progressive and irreversible white matter ...disease with cognitive decline is most feared. We report on four patients with reversible clinical and radiological features occurring years after radiation for brain tumours, suggestive for the so called SMART syndrome (stroke-like migraine attacks after radiation therapy). All four patients (males, age 36–60 years) had been treated with focal brain radiation for a primary brain tumour or with whole-brain radiation therapy for brain metastases. Ranging from 2 to 10 years following radiation therapy patients presented with headache and focal neurological deficits, suggestive for tumour recurrence. Two patients also presented with focal seizures. MRI demonstrated typical cortical swelling and contrast enhancement, primarily in the parieto-occipital region. On follow-up both clinical and MRI features improved spontaneously. Three patients eventually proved to have tumour recurrence. The clinical and radiological picture of these patients is compatible with the SMART syndrome, a rare complication of radiation therapy which is probably under recognized in brain tumour patients. The pathophysiology of the SMART syndrome is poorly understood but bears similarities with the posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). These four cases underline that the SMART syndrome should be considered in patients formerly treated with radiation therapy for brain tumours, who present with new neurologic deficits. Before the diagnosis of SMART syndrome can be established other causes, such as local tumour recurrence, leptomeningeal disease or ischemic disease should be ruled out.
Highlights•Compared to VMAT and IMRT, IMPT significantly reduces the hippocampi doses. •Large dose reductions are also observed for normal brain and other organs at risk. •The results support ...consideration of IMPT for skull-base meningiomas >3 cm.
To evaluate the performance of the hippocampal normal tissue complication model that relates dose to the bilateral hippocampus to memory impairment at 18 months post-treatment in a population of ...low-grade glioma (LGG) patients.
LGG patients treated within the radiotherapy-only arm of the EORTC 22033-26033 trial were analyzed. Hippocampal dose parameters were calculated from the original radiotherapy plans. Difference in Rey Verbal Auditory Learning test delayed recall (AVLT-DR) performance pre-and 18 (±4) months post-treatment was compared to reference data from the Maastricht Aging study. The NTCP model published by Gondi et al. was applied to the dosimetric data and model predictions were compared to actual neurocognitive outcome.
A total of 29 patients met inclusion criteria. Mean dose in EQD2 Gy to the bilateral hippocampus was 39.8 Gy (95% CI 34.3-44.4 Gy), the median dose to 40% of the bilateral hippocampus was 47.2 EQD2 Gy. The model predicted a risk of memory impairment exceeding 99% in 22 patients. However, only seven patients were found to have a significant decline in AVLT-dr score.
In this dataset of only LGG patients treated with radiotherapy the hippocampus NTCP model did not perform as expected to predict cognitive decline based on dose to 40% of the bilateral hippocampus. Caution should be taken when extrapolating this model outside of the range of dose-volume parameters in which it was developed.
•Low grade glioma patients have long survival after radiotherapy treatment.•Radiation-induced neurocognitive function decline is a concern in these patients.•Proton therapy offers effective treatment ...with less radiation exposure to the brain.
Proton therapy offers an attractive alternative to conventional photon-based radiotherapy in low grade glioma patients, delivering radiotherapy with equivalent efficacy to the tumour with less radiation exposure to the brain. In the Netherlands, patients with favourable prognosis based on tumour and patient characteristics can be offered proton therapy. Radiation-induced neurocognitive function decline is a major concern in these long surviving patients. Although level 1 evidence of superior clinical outcome with proton therapy is lacking, the Dutch National Health Care Institute concluded that there is scientific evidence to assume that proton therapy can have clinical benefit by reducing radiation-induced brain damage. Based on this decision, proton therapy is standard insured care for selected low grade glioma patients. Patients with other intracranial tumours can also qualify for proton therapy, based on the same criteria. In this paper, the evidence and considerations that led to this decision are summarised. Additionally, the eligibility criteria for proton therapy and the steps taken to obtain high-quality data on treatment outcome are discussed.
•Accurate organ at risk delineation is crucial during proton and photon therapy.•We developed an MR-based organs-at-risk autosegmentation atlas.•Autosegmentation enables contouring of 34 organs at ...risk in clinical practice.•This enables development of NTCP-models with limited interobserver variation.
During radiotherapy treatment planning, avoidance of organs at risk (OARs) is important. An international consensus-based delineation guideline was recently published with 34 OARs in the brain. We developed an MR-based OAR autosegmentation atlas and evaluated its performance compared to manual delineation.
Anonymized cerebral T1-weighted MR scans (voxel size 0.9 × 0.9 × 0.9 mm3) were available. OARs were manually delineated according to international consensus. Fifty MR scans were used to develop the autosegmentation atlas in a commercially available treatment planning system (Raystation®). The performance of this atlas was tested on another 40 MR scans by automatically delineating 34 OARs, as defined by the 2018 EPTN consensus. Spatial overlap between manual and automated delineations was determined by calculating the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Two radiation oncologists determined the quality of each automatically delineated OAR. The time needed to delineate all OARs manually or to adjust automatically delineated OARs was determined.
DSC was ≥ 0.75 in 31 (91 %) out of 34 automated OAR delineations. Delineations were rated by radiation oncologists as excellent or good in 29 (85 %) out 34 OAR delineations, while 4 were rated fair (12 %) and 1 was rated poor (3 %). Interobserver agreement between the radiation oncologists ranged from 77-100 % per OAR. The time to manually delineate all OARs was 88.5 minutes, while the time needed to adjust automatically delineated OARs was 15.8 minutes.
Autosegmentation of OARs enables high-quality contouring within a limited time. Accurate OAR delineation helps to define OAR constraints to mitigate serious complications and helps with the development of NTCP models.
For unbiased comparison of different radiation modalities and techniques, consensus on delineation of radiation sensitive organs at risk (OARs) and on their dose constraints is warranted. Following ...the publication of a digital, online atlas for OAR delineation in neuro-oncology by the same group, we assessed the brain OAR-dose constraints in a follow-up study.
We performed a comprehensive search to identify the current papers on OAR dose constraints for normofractionated photon and particle therapy in PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Embase and Web of Science. Moreover, the included articles’ reference lists were cross-checked for potential studies that met the inclusion criteria. Consensus was reached among 20 radiation oncology experts in the field of neuro-oncology.
For the OARs published in the neuro-oncology literature, we summarized the available literature and recommended dose constraints associated with certain levels of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) according to the recent ICRU recommendations. For those OARs with lacking or insufficient NTCP data, a proposal for effective and efficient data collection is given.
The use of the European Particle Therapy Network-consensus OAR dose constraints summarized in this article is recommended for the model-based approach comparing photon and proton beam irradiation as well as for prospective clinical trials including novel radiation techniques and/or modalities.
The local failure rate in patients with locoregionally advanced cervical cancer is 41-72% after radiotherapy (RT) alone, whereas local control is a prerequisite for cure. The Dutch Deep Hyperthermia ...Trial showed that combining RT with hyperthermia (HT) improved 3-year local control rates of 41-61%, as we reported earlier. In this study, we evaluate long-term results of the Dutch Deep Hyperthermia Trial after 12 years of follow-up.
From 1990 to 1996, a total of 114 women with locoregionally advanced cervical carcinoma were randomly assigned to RT or RT+HT. The RT was applied to a median total dose of 68 Gy. The HT was given once weekly. The primary end point was local control. Secondary end points were overall survival and late toxicity.
At the 12-year follow-up, local control remained better in the RT+HT group (37% vs. 56%; p=0.01). Survival was persistently better after 12 years: 20% (RT) and 37% (RT+HT; p=0.03). World Health Organization (WHO) performance status was a significant prognostic factor for local control. The WHO performance status, International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, and tumor diameter were significant for survival. The benefit of HT remained significant after correction for these factors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Grade 3 or higher radiation-induced late toxicities were similar in both groups.
For locoregionally advanced cervical cancer, the addition of HT to RT resulted in long-term major improvement in local control and survival without increasing late toxicity. This combined treatment should be considered for patients who are unfit to receive chemotherapy. For other patients, the optimal treatment strategy is the subject of ongoing research.
Background: Radiotherapy is an effective palliative treatment for cancer patients with painful bone metastases. Although single- and multiple-fraction radiotherapy are thought to provide equal ...palliation, which treatment schedule provides better value for the money is unknown. We compared quality-adjusted life expectancy (the overall valuation of the health of the patients) and societal costs for patients receiving either single- or multiple-fraction radiotherapy. Methods: A societal cost–utility analysis was performed on a Dutch randomized, controlled trial of 1157 patients with painful bone metastases that compared pain responses and quality of life from a single-fraction treatment schedule of 8 Gy with a treatment schedule of six fractions of 4 Gy each. The societal values of life expectancies were assessed with the EuroQol classification system (EQ-5D) questionnaire. A subset of 166 patients also answered additional questionnaires to estimate nonradiotherapy and nonmedical costs. Statistical tests were two-sided. Results: Comparing the single- and multiple-fraction radiotherapy schedules, no differences were found in life expectancy (43.0 versus 40.4 weeks, P = .20) or quality-adjusted life expectancy (17.7 versus 16.0 weeks, P = .21). The estimated cost of radiotherapy, including retreatments and nonmedical costs, was statistically significantly lower for the single-fraction schedule than for the multiple-fraction schedule ($2438 versus $3311, difference = $873, 95% confidence interval CI on the difference = $449 to $1297; P<.001). The estimated difference in total societal costs was larger, also in favor of the single-fraction schedule, but it was not statistically significant ($4700 versus $6453, difference = $1753, 95% CI on the difference = –$99 to $3604; P = .06). For willingness-to-pay between $5000 and $40 000 per quality-adjusted life year, the single-fraction schedule was statistically significantly more cost-effective than the multiple-fraction schedule (P≤.05). Conclusions: Compared with multiple-fraction radiotherapy, single-fraction radiotherapy provides equal palliation and quality of life and has lower medical and societal costs, at least in The Netherlands. Therefore, single-fraction radiotherapy should be considered as the palliative treatment of choice for cancer patients with painful bone metastases.
Abstract Purpose Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) of brain metastases is considered effective when long-term local control is obtained. However, dose–effect data are scarce. We, therefore, performed a ...systematic literature search to assess the evidence concerning the relation of SRT dose and local control probability. Methods and materials A search was performed for papers describing patients treated with SRT for brain metastases, published from 1990 through 2009, in the electronic databases Medline (Pubmed) and Embase. We selected only papers reporting actuarial local control probability, in which a fixed dose had been prescribed and in which the size of the metastases was given. Series with SRT as a boost after whole brain irradiation (WBI) or with SRT after surgery were excluded. From the selected papers we extracted data on dose, local control rates and necrosis rates. Biological effective doses of the linear-quadratic-cubic model, using an α / β of 12 Gy (BED12 ), were calculated and a dose–response curve was constructed. Results Eleven papers fulfilled the selection criteria for further analysis. Six-month local control rates were higher than 80% in almost all the series irrespective of dose. Twelve-month local control rates, however, varied and were higher than 80%, higher than 60% and lower than 50% with single doses of ⩾21 Gy, ⩾18 Gy and ⩽15 Gy, respectively, and 70% or higher with fractionated SRT (FSRT). A BED12 of at least 40 Gy was associated with a twelve–month local control rate of 70% or more. Conclusion Local control after single fraction SRT is highly dependent upon dose and is high (>80%) after 21 Gy or more, but low (<50%) after 15 Gy or less. We conclude that SRT for brain metastases should preferably be applied with a BED12 of at least 40 Gy corresponding with a single fraction of 20 Gy, two fractions of 11.6 Gy or three fractions of 8.5 Gy.
Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) is expected to have a less detrimental effect on neurocognitive functioning and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) than whole-brain radiotherapy. To evaluate the ...impact of brain metastases and SRT on neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL, we performed a prospective study.
Neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL of 97 patients with brain metastases were measured before SRT and 1, 3, and 6 months after SRT. Seven cognitive domains were assessed. HRQoL was assessed with the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 and BN20 questionnaires. Neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL over time were analyzed with linear mixed models and stratified for baseline Karnofsky performance status (KPS), total metastatic volume, and systemic disease.
Median overall survival of patients was 7.7 months. Before SRT, neurocognitive domain and HRQoL scores were lower in patients than in healthy controls. At group level, patients worsened in physical functioning and fatigue at 6 months, while other outcome parameters of HRQoL and cognition remained stable. KPS < 90 and tumor volume >12.6 cm(3) were both associated with worse information processing speed and lower HRQoL scores over 6 months time. Intracranial tumor progression was associated with worsening of executive functioning and motor function.
Prior to SRT, neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL are moderately impaired in patients with brain metastases. Lower baseline KPS and larger tumor volume are associated with worse functioning. Over time, SRT does not have an additional detrimental effect on neurocognitive functioning and HRQoL, suggesting that SRT may be preferred over whole-brain radiotherapy.
PDF
