Summary Background Immunochemotherapy with rituximab and cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) has become the standard of care for elderly patients with diffuse large ...B-cell lymphoma. We aimed to ascertain if a dose-dense R-CHOP regimen administered every 2 weeks (R-CHOP14) was superior to the standard 3-week schedule (R-CHOP21). Methods We did a randomised phase 3 trial at 83 centres in four countries. 602 patients aged 60–80 years with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor (age-adjusted international prognostic index ≥1) were eligible for the study. We randomly allocated individuals to R-CHOP—ie, rituximab (375 mg/m2 ), cyclophosphamide (750 mg/m2 ), doxorubicin (50 mg/m2 ), vincristine (1·4 mg/m2 , up to 2 mg) all on day 1, and prednisone 40 mg/m2 daily for 5 days—administered every 14 days (n=304) or every 21 days (n=298) for eight cycles. We did permuted-block randomisation (block size four, allocation ratio 1:1) stratified by centre and number of adverse prognostic factors. The primary endpoint was event-free survival. Our analysis was of the intention-to-treat population, and we present the final analysis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov , number NCT00144755. Findings Two patients allocated R-CHOP21 were ineligible for the study and were excluded from analyses. After median follow-up of 56 months (IQR 27–60), 3-year event-free survival was 56% (95% CI 50–62) in the R-CHOP14 group and 60% (55–66) in the R-CHOP21 group (hazard ratio 1·04, 95% CI 0·82–1·31; p=0·7614). Grade 3–4 neutropenia occurred in 224 (74%) of 304 patients allocated R-CHOP14 and 189 (64%) of 296 assigned R-CHOP21, despite increased use of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in the R-CHOP14 group compared with the R-CHOP21 group. 143 (47%) patients in the R-CHOP14 group received at least one red-blood-cell transfusion versus 93 (31%) in the R-CHOP21 group (p=0·0001). 35 (12%) patients allocated R-CHOP14 received at least one platelet transfusion versus 25 (8%) assigned R-CHOP21 (p=0·2156). 155 (51%) patients who were assigned R-CHOP14 had at least one serious adverse event compared with 140 (47%) who were allocated R-CHOP21. Interpretation In elderly patients with untreated diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and at least one adverse prognostic factor, a 2-week dose-dense R-CHOP regimen did not improve efficacy compared with the 3-week standard schedule. The frequency of toxic side-effects was similar between regimens, but R-CHOP14 was associated with increased need for red-blood-cell transfusion. Funding Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA), Amgen.
Idelalisib, a selective inhibitor of PI3Kδ, is approved for the treatment of patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) in combination with rituximab. We aimed to assess the efficacy ...and safety of idelalisib in combination with a second-generation anti-CD20 antibody, ofatumumab, in a similar patient population.
In this global, open-label, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed CLL progressing less than 24 months from last therapy. Patients refractory to ofatumumab were excluded. Patients were stratified by relapsed versus refractory disease, presence or absence of del(17p) or TP53 mutation, or both, and IGHV mutated versus unmutated. We randomised patients in a 2:1 ratio using a web-based interactive system that generated a unique treatment code, and assigned patients to receive either idelalisib plus ofatumumab (oral idelalisib 150 mg twice daily continuously plus ofatumumab 300 mg intravenously in week 1, then 1000 mg intravenously weekly for 7 weeks, and every 4 weeks for 16 weeks) or ofatumumab alone (ofatumumab dosing as per the combination group, except 2000 mg was substituted for the 1000 mg dose). An independent review committee assessed response, including progressive disease, based on imaging using modified International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia 2008 criteria. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by an independent review committee in the intention-to-treat population. We did a primary analysis (data cutoff Jan 15, 2015) and an updated analysis (data cutoff Sept 1, 2015). This trial is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov, number NCT01659021.
Between Dec 17, 2012, and March 31, 2014, we enrolled 261 patients (median age 68 years IQR 61-74, median previous therapies three IQR 2-4). At the primary analysis, median progression-free survival was 16·3 months (95% CI 13·6-17·8) in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and 8·0 months (5·7-8·2) in the ofatumumab group (adjusted hazard ratio HR 0·27, 95% CI 0·19-0·39, p<0·0001). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group were neutropenia (59 34% patients vs 14 16% in the ofatumumab group), diarrhoea (34 20% vs one 1%), and pneumonia (25 14% vs seven 8%). The most frequent grade 3 or worse adverse events in the ofatumumab group were neutropenia (14 16%), pneumonia (seven 8%), and thrombocytopenia (six 7% vs 19 11% in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group). Serious infections were more common in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group and included pneumonia (23 13% patients in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group vs nine 10% in the ofatumumab group), sepsis (11 6% vs one 1%), and Pneumocystis jirovecii pneumonia (eight 5% vs one 1%). 22 treatment-related deaths occurred in the idelalisib plus ofatumumab group (the most common being sepsis, septic shock, viral sepsis, and pneumonia). Six treatment-related deaths occurred in the ofatumumab group (the most common being progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy and pneumonia).
The idelalisib plus ofatumumab combination resulted in better progression-free survival compared with ofatumumab alone in patients with relapsed CLL, including in those with high-risk disease, and thus might represent a new treatment alternative for this patient population.
Gilead Sciences, Inc.
In GLOW, fixed-duration ibrutinib + venetoclax showed superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab in older/comorbid patients with previously untreated chronic ...lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). The current analysis describes minimal residual disease (MRD) kinetics and any potential predictive value for PFS, as it has not yet been evaluated for ibrutinib + venetoclax treatment.
Undetectable MRD (uMRD) was assessed by next-generation sequencing at <1 CLL cell per 10,000 (<10
) and <1 CLL cell per 100,000 (<10
) leukocytes. PFS was analyzed by MRD status at 3 months after treatment (EOT+3).
Ibrutinib + venetoclax achieved deeper uMRD (<10
) rates in bone marrow (BM) and peripheral blood (PB), respectively, in 40.6% and 43.4% of patients at EOT+3 versus 7.6% and 18.1% of patients receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. Of these patients, uMRD (<10
) in PB was sustained during the first year post-treatment (EOT+12) in 80.4% of patients receiving ibrutinib + venetoclax and 26.3% receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. Patients with detectable MRD (dMRD; ≥10
) in PB at EOT+3 were more likely to sustain MRD levels through EOT+12 with ibrutinib + venetoclax versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. PFS rates at EOT+12 were high among patients treated with ibrutinib + venetoclax regardless of MRD status at EOT+3: 96.3% and 93.3% in patients with uMRD (<10
) and dMRD (≥10
) in BM, respectively, versus 83.3% and 58.7% for patients receiving chlorambucil + obinutuzumab. PFS rates at EOT+12 also remained high in patients with unmutated immunoglobulin heavy-chain variable region (IGHV) receiving ibrutinib + venetoclax, independent of MRD status in BM.
Molecular and clinical relapses were less frequent during the first year post-treatment with ibrutinib + venetoclax versus chlorambucil + obinutuzumab regardless of MRD status at EOT+3 and IGHV status. Even for patients not achieving uMRD (<10
), PFS rates remained high with ibrutinib + venetoclax; this is a novel finding and requires additional follow-up to confirm its persistence over time.
BACKGROUND: GLOW is a phase 3 trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib-venetoclax in older patients and/or those with comorbidities with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia ...(CLL). METHODS: We randomly assigned (1:1) patients 65 years of age or older or those 18 to 64 years of age who also had a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score greater than 6 (CIRS scores range from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating more impaired function of organ systems) or creatinine clearance of less than 70 ml/min, to ibrutinib-venetoclax (3 cycles ibrutinib lead-in, then 12 cycles ibrutinib-venetoclax) or chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (6 cycles). The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee. Secondary end points included undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD), response rates, and safety. RESULTS: This study enrolled 211 patients, with 106 randomly assigned to ibrutinib-venetoclax and 105 to chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. With a median follow-up of 27.7 months, there were 22 PFS events for ibrutinib-venetoclax and 67 events for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. PFS was significantly longer for ibrutinib-venetoclax than for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.216; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.131 to 0.357; P<0.001). The improvement in PFS with ibrutinib-venetoclax was consistent across predefined subgroups, including patients 65 years of age or older or with a CIRS score greater than 6. The best uMRD rate in bone marrow by next-generation sequencing was significantly higher for ibrutinib-venetoclax (55.7%) than for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (21.0%; P<0.001). The proportion of patients with sustained uMRD in peripheral blood from 3 to 12 months after end of treatment was 84.5% for ibrutinib-venetoclax and 29.3% for chlorambucil-obinutuzumab. Four patients treated with ibrutinib-venetoclax required subsequent therapy compared with 27 patients receiving chlorambucil-obinutuzumab (hazard ratio, 0.143; 95% CI, 0.050 to 0.410). Adverse events grade 3 or greater occurred for 80 (75.5%) and 73 (69.5%) patients receiving ibrutinib-venetoclax and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab, respectively, with neutropenia being most common in both arms (37 34.9% and 52 49.5%). There were 11 (10.4%) and 12 (11.4%) all-cause deaths in the ibrutinib-venetoclax and chlorambucil-obinutuzumab arms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Ibrutinib-venetoclax, an all-oral, once-daily, fixed-duration combination, demonstrated superior PFS and deeper and better sustained responses versus chlorambucil-obinutuzumab as first-line CLL treatment in older patients and/or those with comorbidities. (Funded by Janssen Research & Development, LLC, and Pharmacyclics; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03462719.)
