Abstract
Aims
To compare demographic characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes of patients with and without concomitant cardiac disease, hospitalized for COVID-19 in Brescia, Lombardy, ...Italy.
Methods and results
The study population includes 99 consecutive patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to our hospital between 4 March and 25 March 2020. Fifty-three patients with a history of cardiac disease were compared with 46 without cardiac disease. Among cardiac patients, 40% had a history of heart failure, 36% had atrial fibrillation, and 30% had coronary artery disease. Mean age was 67 ± 12 years, and 80 (81%) patients were males. No differences were found between cardiac and non-cardiac patients except for higher values of serum creatinine, N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, and high sensitivity troponin T in cardiac patients. During hospitalization, 26% patients died, 15% developed thrombo-embolic events, 19% had acute respiratory distress syndrome, and 6% had septic shock. Mortality was higher in patients with cardiac disease compared with the others (36% vs. 15%, log-rank P = 0.019; relative risk 2.35; 95% confidence interval 1.08–5.09). The rate of thrombo-embolic events and septic shock during the hospitalization was also higher in cardiac patients (23% vs. 6% and 11% vs. 0%, respectively).
Conclusions
Hospitalized patients with concomitant cardiac disease and COVID-19 have an extremely poor prognosis compared with subjects without a history of cardiac disease, with higher mortality, thrombo-embolic events, and septic shock rates.
COAPT-trial entry criteria are useful to identify patients with better outcomes after transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER). However, up to one-half of real-world patients with secondary mitral ...regurgitation (SMR) undergoing TEER do not meet these highly selective criteria and no study has formally investigated them. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictors of good outcome after TEER in COAPT-ineligible patients.
All consecutive patients with SMR and heart failure (HF) treated with MitraClip at 3 European centres were retrospectively screened. The presence of at least 1 COAPT exclusion criterion was used to define a COAPT-ineligible profile, allowing the inclusion in the study population. Freedom from all-cause death or HF hospitalisation was evaluated at 2-year follow-up (primary end point).
A total of 305 patients (47%) had a COAPT-ineligible profile. An overall 58% rate of all-cause death or HF hospitalisation was detected at 2 years. Patients with a single COAPT exclusion criterion experienced fewer adverse events than those with multiple criteria (55% vs 69%). At multivariable Cox regression analysis, New York Heart Association functional class II, younger age (< 75 years), lower serum creatinine (< 2 mg/dL), lower left ventricular end-diastolic volume (< 240 mL), and the absence of hemodynamic instability, atrial fibrillation, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease were independently associated with good outcome.
In this real-world series of patients with SMR undergoing TEER, a COAPT-ineligible profile was common. The presence of only 1 COAPT exclusion criterion or the absence of hemodynamic instability were associated with the most favourable outcomes.
Les critères d’admission à l’étude COAPT (CardiovascularOutcomesAssessment of the MitraClipPercutaneousTherapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) sont utiles pour identifier les patients susceptibles d’obtenir de meilleurs résultats après une réparation mitrale percutanée bord à bord (RMPBB). Cependant, en contexte réel, jusqu’à la moitié des patients atteints d'insuffisance mitrale secondaire (IMS) qui subissent une RMPBB ne répondent pas à ces critères hautement sélectifs et aucune étude formelle ne les a formellement étudiés. La présente étude visait à évaluer les prédicteurs d’une issue favorable à la suite d’une RMPBB chez les patients non admissibles selon les critères de l’étude COAPT.
Tous les patients consécutifs atteints d'IMS et d’insuffisance cardiaque (IC) traités au moyen d’un dispositif MitraClip dans trois centres européens ont été choisis de façon rétrospective. La présence d’au moins un critère d’exclusion de l’étude COAPT a été utilisée pour définir un profil non admissible selon les critères COAPT, et admettre les patients dans la population de la présente étude. L’absence de décès toutes causes confondues et d’hospitalisation pour IC a été évaluée après un suivi de deux ans (critère d’évaluation principal).
Au total, 305 patients (47 %) présentaient un profil non admissible selon les critères COAPT. Un taux global de 58 % de décès toutes causes confondues ou d’hospitalisation pour IC a été observé après un suivi de deux ans. Chez les patients présentant un seul critère d’exclusion de l’étude COAPT, la fréquence de manifestations indésirables a été plus faible que chez les patients présentant plus d’un critère d’exclusion (55 % vs 69 %). Dans une analyse de régression de Cox multivariée, la classe II de la classification de la NYHA, un âge moins avancé (< 75 ans), un taux sérique de créatinine faible (< 2 mg/dl), un volume télédiastolique faible dans le ventricule gauche (< 240 ml), et l’absence d’instabilité hémodynamique, de fibrillation auriculaire et de maladie pulmonaire obstructive chronique ont été des variables associées de façon indépendante à une issue favorable.
Chez cette série de patients traités en contexte réel qui étaient atteints d'IMS et qui ont été soumis à une RMPBB, un profil non admissible selon les critères de l’étude COAPT était une ca- ractéristique courante. La présence d’un seul critère d’exclusion de l’étude COAPT ou l’absence d’instabilité hémodynamique ont été associées aux issues les plus favorables.
Virus infection has been widely described as one of the most common causes of myocarditis. However, less is known about the cardiac involvement as a complication of severe acute respiratory syndrome ...coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.
To describe the presentation of acute myocardial inflammation in a patient with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who recovered from the influenzalike syndrome and developed fatigue and signs and symptoms of heart failure a week after upper respiratory tract symptoms.
This case report describes an otherwise healthy 53-year-old woman who tested positive for COVID-19 and was admitted to the cardiac care unit in March 2020 for acute myopericarditis with systolic dysfunction, confirmed on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, the week after onset of fever and dry cough due to COVID-19. The patient did not show any respiratory involvement during the clinical course.
Cardiac involvement with COVID-19.
Detection of cardiac involvement with an increase in levels of N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and high-sensitivity troponin T, echocardiography changes, and diffuse biventricular myocardial edema and late gadolinium enhancement on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
An otherwise healthy 53-year-old white woman presented to the emergency department with severe fatigue. She described fever and dry cough the week before. She was afebrile but hypotensive; electrocardiography showed diffuse ST elevation, and elevated high-sensitivity troponin T and NT-proBNP levels were detected. Findings on chest radiography were normal. There was no evidence of obstructive coronary disease on coronary angiography. Based on the COVID-19 outbreak, a nasopharyngeal swab was performed, with a positive result for SARS-CoV-2 on real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging showed increased wall thickness with diffuse biventricular hypokinesis, especially in the apical segments, and severe left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction of 35%). Short tau inversion recovery and T2-mapping sequences showed marked biventricular myocardial interstitial edema, and there was also diffuse late gadolinium enhancement involving the entire biventricular wall. There was a circumferential pericardial effusion that was most notable around the right cardiac chambers. These findings were all consistent with acute myopericarditis. She was treated with dobutamine, antiviral drugs (lopinavir/ritonavir), steroids, chloroquine, and medical treatment for heart failure, with progressive clinical and instrumental stabilization.
This case highlights cardiac involvement as a complication associated with COVID-19, even without symptoms and signs of interstitial pneumonia.
Aims
To assess the prognostic value of a history of heart failure (HF) in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19).
Methods and results
We enrolled 692 consecutive patients admitted for ...COVID‐19 in 13 Italian cardiology centres between 1 March and 9 April 2020. Mean age was 67.4 ± 13.2 years, 69.5% of patients were males, 90 (13.0%) had a history of HF, median hospitalization length was 14 days (interquartile range 9–24). In‐hospital death occurred in 37 of 90 patients (41.1%) with HF history vs. 126 of those with no HF history (20.9%). The increased risk of death associated with HF history remained significant after adjustment for clinical variables related to COVID‐19 and HF severity, including comorbidities, oxygen saturation, lymphocyte count and plasma troponin adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for death: 2.25; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26–4.02; P = 0.006 at multivariable Cox regression model including 404 patients. Patients with a history of HF also had more in‐hospital complications including
acute HF (33.3% vs. 5.1%, P < 0.001), acute renal failure (28.1% vs. 12.9%, P < 0.001), multiorgan failure (15.9% vs. 5.8%, P = 0.004) and sepsis (18.4% vs. 8.9%, P = 0.006). Other independent predictors of outcome were age, sex, oxygen saturation and oxygen partial pressure at arterial gas analysis/fraction of inspired oxygen ratio (PaO2/FiO2). In‐hospital treatment with corticosteroids and heparin had beneficial effects (adjusted HR for death: 0.46; 95% CI 0.29–0.74; P = 0.001; n = 404 for corticosteroids, and adjusted HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.25–0.67; P < 0.001; n = 364 for heparin).
Conclusions
Hospitalized patients with COVID‐19 and a history of HF have an extremely poor outcome with higher mortality and in‐hospital complications. HF history is an independent predictor of increased in‐hospital mortality.
Purpose of the review
Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and cardiovascular (CV) disease have a close relationship that emerged from the earliest reports. The aim of this review is to show the ...possible associations between COVID-19 and heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF).
Recent findings
In hospitalized patients with COVID-19, the prevalence of HFpEF is high, ranging from 4 to 16%, probably due to the shared cardio-metabolic risk profile. Indeed, comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, obesity and chronic kidney disease — known predictors of a severe course of COVID-19 — are major causes of HFpEF, too. COVID-19 may represent a precipitating factor leading to acute decompensation of HF in patients with known HFpEF and in those with subclinical diastolic dysfunction, which becomes overt. COVID-19 may also directly or indirectly affect the heart. In otherwise healthy patients, echocardiographic studies showed that the majority of COVID-19 patients present diastolic (rather than systolic) impairment, pulmonary hypertension and right ventricular dysfunction. Such abnormalities are observed both in the acute or subacute phase of COVID-19. Cardiac magnetic resonance reveals myocardial inflammation and fibrosis in up to the 78% of patients in the chronic phase of the disease.
Summary
These findings suggest that COVID-19 might be a novel independent risk factor for the development of HFpEF, through the activation of a systemic pro-inflammatory state. Follow-up studies are urgently needed to better understand long-term sequelae of COVID-19 inflammatory cardiomyopathy.
: Tricuspid regurgitation, either isolated or associated with left-valve disease, has a strong impact on outcome. Surgical treatment of tricuspid regurgitation has increased in recent years, but ...in-hospital mortality remains high probably due to the risk profile of the recipients. As a consequence, most of the patients with severe tricuspid regurgitation, especially if isolated, remain untreated. Transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions are rapidly spreading as alternative options to open-heart procedures fulfilling this important unmet need. Although patient selection and timing of intervention are unclear, many devices have been developed in recent years for both repair and replacement of tricuspid valve. Repair tools can be targeted to leaflets or annulus. Replacement devices include heterotopic and orthotropic systems. The aim of this review is to report possible indications and summarize current data about the different devices available for transcatheter tricuspid valve interventions.
Background
Pulmonary embolism (PE) has been described in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) critically ill patients, but the evidence from more heterogeneous cohorts is limited.
Methods
Data were ...retrospectively obtained from consecutive COVID-19 patients admitted to 13 Cardiology Units in Italy, from March 1st to April 9th, 2020, and followed until in-hospital death, discharge, or April 23rd, 2020. The association of baseline variables with computed tomography-confirmed PE was investigated by Cox hazards regression analysis. The relationship between
d
-dimer levels and PE incidence was evaluated using restricted cubic splines models.
Results
The study included 689 patients (67.3 ± 13.2 year-old, 69.4% males), of whom 43.6% were non-invasively ventilated and 15.8% invasively. 52 (7.5%) had PE over 15 (9–24) days of follow-up. Compared with those without PE, these subjects had younger age, higher BMI, less often heart failure and chronic kidney disease, more severe cardio-pulmonary involvement, and higher admission
d
-dimer 4344 (1099–15,118) vs. 818.5 (417–1460) ng/mL,
p
< 0.001. They also received more frequently darunavir/ritonavir, tocilizumab and ventilation support. Furthermore, they faced more bleeding episodes requiring transfusion (15.6% vs. 5.1%,
p
< 0.001) and non-significantly higher in-hospital mortality (34.6% vs. 22.9%,
p
= 0.06). In multivariate regression, only
d
-dimer was associated with PE (HR 1.72, 95% CI 1.13–2.62;
p
= 0.01). The relation between
d
-dimer concentrations and PE incidence was linear, without inflection point. Only two subjects had a baseline
d
-dimer < 500 ng/mL.
Conclusions
PE occurs in a sizable proportion of hospitalized COVID-19 patients. The implications of bleeding events and the role of
d
-dimer in this population need to be clarified.
Graphic abstract
Abstract
Aims
To assess the clinical relevance of a history of atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19).
Methods and results
We enrolled 696 ...consecutive patients (mean age 67.4 ± 13.2 years, 69.7% males) admitted for COVID-19 in 13 Italian cardiology centres between 1 March and 9 April 2020. One hundred and six patients (15%) had a history of AF and the median hospitalization length was 14 days (interquartile range 9–24). Patients with a history of AF were older and with a higher burden of cardiovascular risk factors. Compared to patients without AF, they showed a higher rate of in-hospital death (38.7% vs. 20.8%; P < 0.001). History of AF was associated with an increased risk of death after adjustment for clinical confounders related to COVID-19 severity and cardiovascular comorbidities, including history of heart failure (HF) and increased plasma troponin adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 1.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06–2.84; P = 0.029. Patients with a history of AF also had more in-hospital clinical events including new-onset AF (36.8% vs. 7.9%; P < 0.001), acute HF (25.3% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001), and multiorgan failure (13.9% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.010). The association between AF and worse outcome was not modified by previous or concomitant use of anticoagulants or steroid therapy (P for interaction >0.05 for both) and was not related to stroke or bleeding events.
Conclusion
Among hospitalized patients with COVID-19, a history of AF contributes to worse clinical course with a higher mortality and in-hospital events including new-onset AF, acute HF, and multiorgan failure. The mortality risk remains significant after adjustment for variables associated with COVID-19 severity and comorbidities.
PDF
