Genetic markers identifying women at an increased risk of developing breast cancer exist, yet the majority of inherited risk remains elusive. While numerous BRCA1 coding sequence mutations are ...associated with breast cancer risk, BRCA1 mutations account for less then 5% of breast cancer risk. Since 3' untranslated region (3'UTR) polymorphisms disrupting microRNA (miRNA) binding can be functional and can act as genetic markers of cancer risk, we tested the hypothesis that such polymorphisms in the 3'UTR of BRCA1 and haplotypes containing these functional polymorphisms may be associated with breast cancer risk. We sequenced the BRCA1 3'UTR from breast cancer patients to identify miRNA disrupting polymorphisms. We further evaluated haplotypes of this region including the identified 3'UTR variants in a large population of controls and breast cancer patients (n=221) with known breast cancer subtypes and ethnicities. We identified three 3'UTR variants in BRCA1 that are polymorphic in breast cancer populations, and haplotype analysis including these variants revealed that breast cancer patients harbor five rare haplotypes not generally found among controls (9.50% for breast cancer chromosomes, 0.11% for control chromosomes, p=0.0001). Three of these rare haplotypes contain the rs8176318 BRCA1 3'UTR functional variant. These haplotypes are not biomarkers for BRCA1 coding mutations, as they are found rarely in BRCA1 mutant breast cancer patients (1/129 patients= 0.78%). These rare BRCA1 haplotypes and 3'UTR SNPs may represent new genetic markers of breast cancer risk.
We propose a two‐stage design for a single arm clinical trial with an early stopping rule for futility. This design employs different endpoints to assess early stopping and efficacy. The early ...stopping rule is based on a criteria determined more quickly than that for efficacy. These separate criteria are also nested in the sense that efficacy is a special case of, but usually not identical to, the early stopping endpoint. The design readily allows for planning in terms of statistical significance, power, expected sample size, and expected duration. This method is illustrated with a phase II design comparing rates of disease progression in elderly patients treated for lung cancer to rates found using a historical control. In this example, the early stopping rule is based on the number of patients who exhibit progression‐free survival (PFS) at 2 months post treatment follow‐up. Efficacy is judged by the number of patients who have PFS at 6 months. We demonstrate our design has expected sample size and power comparable with the Simon two‐stage design but exhibits shorter expected duration under a range of useful parameter values.
Study Background: Survival outcomes of older patients with AML are dismal with a 3-year survival of < 10%. The combination of hypomethylating agents (HMA) with venetoclax has emerged as the new ...standard of care for older unfit patients with AML, but median survival remains less than 15 months. Patients with undetectable MRD after this regimen seem to have the best long-term clinical outcomes. In this randomized phase 2 trial, the goal with combining pembrolizumab is to facilitate a more effective CTL mediated destruction of leukemic blasts resulting in improved rates of CR without MRD, which would hopefully increase duration of response and lower relapse rates. Here we report on the design of the first randomized multi-center clinical trial of HMA+venetoclax +/- ICPI in unfit AML patients.
Methods: The primary objective of this Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program-approved multi-institutional, randomized phase II study (NCT04284787) is to assess the percentage of patients with MRD negative CR (MRD- CR) as measured by flow cytometry with chemotherapy + pembrolizumab during the first 6 cycles and compare between the two study arms (See study Schema). Secondary objectives include rates of CR / complete remission with incomplete count recovery (CRi), complete remission with partial recovery count (CRh) and Hematologic improvement (HI) to red blood cells and platelets, MRD negativity at Day 14, MRD-negative CR at end of induction therapy and MRD negative CR after last consolidation cycle, event free survival (EFS), relapse free survival (RFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS), and proportion of patients who develop severe toxicity. Important exploratory objectives include MRD assessment by duplex sequencing (DS), and comparing DS and multiparameter flow cytometry for MRD detection.
A total of 76 patients will be included (38 patients in the intervention arm and 38 patients in the control arm). Planned stratification factors include 1) cytogenetics (intermediate/unknown vs. adverse karyotype) 2) antecedent hematologic disorder defined as prior MDS, MPN, or aplastic anemia (present vs. absent); and 3) reason to not receive intensive chemotherapy (ineligibility vs refusal). All patients will receive azacitidine at 75 mg/m2 IV over 10-40 minutes or SQ x 7 days on Days 1-7 or Days 5-2 (to avoid weekend administration) and, including a ramp-up phase to 400 mg /day venetoclax on Days 1-4. Venetoclax will be administered at 400 mg/day on the remaining days of the cycle for the first cycle and on Days 1-21 or 1-28 for subsequent cycles (depending on count recovery).
Half of the patients will receive pembrolizumab intravenously starting on Day 8 of the first cycle and then q 3 weeks in cycles 2-6 (intervention arm), up to 2 years of maintenance. The other half will not receive pembrolizumab (control arm). After 15 efficacy-evaluable patients in each of the two study arms have had their primary endpoint results available, a formal futility and toxicity analysis will be conducted. Follow up will continue up to 2 years after the last patient is randomized
Eligible patients are aged ≥60 years with newly diagnosed and pathologically-confirmed AML, including secondary AML arising from prior MDS and therapy-related AML, who are deemed ineligible for intensive chemotherapy according to treating physician’s assessment or who refuse intensive chemotherapy. Candidates with high risk MDS and secondary AML arising from myeloproliferative neoplasm or other hematologic disorders are not allowed. Additional exclusion criteria include CBF-AML, prior allogeneic stem cell transplant, receipt of prior hypomethylating therapy for antecedent MDS, active infection requiring systemic therapy, and use of corticosteroids.
Responses in AML patients will be assessed using European Leukemia Net 2017 response criteria. EFS will be calculated as the time from initial treatment to either disease relapse or death. OS will be calculated from time from initial treatment to death. Biomarker analyses will include an extensive array of immunologic and correlative studies that will evaluate PD-1 and PD-L1 expression, immune cell subset analysis, leukemia specific T-cell response, cytokine level, T-cell receptor (TCR) repertoire, as well as RNA-seq, gut microbiome characterization and metabolomics, and whole exome sequencing for tumor and germline DNA.
Display omitted
Zeidan:Abbvie: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; MedImmune/Astrazeneca: Research Funding; Incyte: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Jazz: Consultancy, Honoraria; Celgene / BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Trovagene: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Agios: Consultancy, Honoraria; Boehringer-Ingelheim: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Acceleron: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Honoraria; BeyondSpring: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardiff Oncology: Consultancy, Honoraria, Other; Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Ionis: Consultancy, Honoraria; Epizyme: Consultancy, Honoraria; Leukemia and Lymphoma Society: Other; CCITLA: Other; Astex: Research Funding; Aprea: Research Funding; ADC Therapeutics: Research Funding; Taiho: Consultancy, Honoraria; Astellas: Consultancy, Honoraria; Daiichi Sankyo: Consultancy, Honoraria; Cardinal Health: Consultancy, Honoraria; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Otsuka: Consultancy, Honoraria. Radich:Amgen: Consultancy; Bristol-Myers Squibb: Consultancy; Jazz: Consultancy; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Consultancy, Research Funding.
Abstract
Violence directed against older persons is recognized as a global health problem. However, structural drivers for violence remain under-studied. This country-level ecological study aimed to ...examine a previously unexplored link between structural ageism and violence against older persons. Following extensive structural stigma literature, structural ageism consisted of two components: (1) discriminatory national policies related to older persons’ economic, social, civil, and political rights, gathered from global databases including UN, WHO, and others; and (2) societal-level prejudicial social norms against older persons, measured by negative attitudes toward older persons by the World Values Survey. Two components were z scored and combined such that higher score indicated greater structural ageism. Prevalence rates of violence per 100,000 persons aged 70 and over in each country were drawn from the Global Burden of Diseases Study. Final analysis included 56 countries, representing 63% of the world’s aging population aged 60 and over across all six WHO regions. As predicted, structural ageism was significantly associated with the prevalence rates of violence in multivariate models (β =205.7, SE=96.3, P=.03), after adjusting for country-level sociodemographic and health covariates. Three sets of sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of our findings. That is, structural ageism did not predict other types of violence and other types of prejudice did not predict violence against older persons. Public health and population-based violence prevention policies may benefit from a targeted approach that tackles the harmful effects of structural ageism.
Abstract
Considering that elder abuse affects one in six older persons worldwide, a need exists to identify factors that predict this abuse. Previous studies have found that ageism operates at both ...structural (i.e., societal-level stigmatizing views toward older persons) and individual levels (i.e., negative age beliefs) to affect health. However, it was not known whether and if so, how these two levels work together to impact perpetrators committing elder abuse. Thus, examining the mechanism between ageism and elder abuse was the aim of the current study. We hypothesized that structural and individual ageism would simultaneously predict elder abuse. In addition, following Stereotype Embodiment Theory, the impact of structural ageism on elder abuse would be mediated by individual ageism. In Sample 1, participants described their proclivity to abuse older people if they could do so without punishment (n=1,580). In Sample 2, family caregivers described actual abuse of their older care recipients (n=400). Overall, elder abuse proclivity (33% in Sample 1) and perpetration (56% in Sample 2) were prevalent. As hypothesized, structural ageism and individual ageism simultaneously predicted elder abuse proclivity and perpetration. Also as predicted, individual ageism significantly mediated the association between structural ageism and elder abuse in both samples. This the first study that examined the mechanistic pathways between structural and individual levels of ageism in the context of elder abuse. Effective solutions to prevent elder abuse should incorporate upstream interventions to mitigate the adverse effects of ageism.
▪
Introduction: Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) starts as episodes of recurrent pain and progresses to chronic pain with age. Pain is typically treated with opioids which are often insufficient. ...One reason for this may be that opioids likely do not effectively treat neuropathic or inflammatory pain in SCD. Cannabinoids, such as marijuana, alleviate neuropathic pain and reduce inflammation. Our SCD patients report marijuana improves their pain and studies in murine models of SCD show cannabinoids reduce mast cell activation, inflammation, and hyperalgesia. Medical marijuana is now legal in 28 states and 4 of them list SCD as a qualifying condition. However, there are minimal data on the use of marijuana in SCD. Thus, we performed a pilot study of adults with SCD who use daily marijuana. Our hypothesis was that daily marijuana users would have worse pain scores from non-daily users which drives their drug use. Our secondary hypotheses were that daily marijuana users may have decreased levels of opioid use, hospital utilization, quality of life measures (QoL) or inflammation.
Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional pilot study of adults living with SCD who do and do not use daily marijuana. Subjects were enrolled at scheduled clinic visits, any subject not at their heathy baseline was excluded. Subjects were asked if they had used marijuana in the past 30 days, reasons for use, and rate of use. Subjects who reported daily use were compared to those who used less often or reported no marijuana use. Our primary outcome was pain as defined by Adult Sickle Cell Quality of Life measurement information system (ASCQ-Me) pain domains. ASCQ-Me has separate domains for pain crisis frequency, pain crisis severity, and 7-day pain interference which allows for measurement of both crisis pain and chronic pain. Our secondary outcomes were differences in hospital utilization, opioid use, QoL measures included in ASCQ-ME: sleep, stiffness, social impact and emotional impact, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System domains for nausea and anxiety, and inflammation as demonstrated by WBC and platelet counts, C reactive protein (CRP), markers of mast cell and neutrophil activation and endothelial damage. Hospital utilization (total annual admissions and emergency room visits) was assessed by medical record review over a one-year period (1/1/2016 to 12/31/2016). Weekly opioid use was estimated by review of dispensed prescriptions using the Connecticut Prescription Monitoring Program converted into average weekly oral morphine equivalents. Flow cytometry was performed for levels of: neutrophils and activated neutrophils, monocytes, non-classical and inflammatory monocytes, circulating endothelial cells (CECs) and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs). The R statistical software program was used to perform t-tests and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests where normality was not met to compare daily users to non-daily users. Significance was set at p<0.05.
Results: We enrolled 29 subjects,16 (55%) of whom reported marijuana use in the past 30 days and of those 6 (21%) reported daily marijuana use. Pain relief was endorsed as a reason for marijuana use in 93% of users and 100% of daily users. There was no difference in mean age (32.0 SD 8.6 vs 32.4 SD 12.6 years p=1.0) or gender (% female: 67 vs 52% p=0.7) between groups. Daily marijuana users had higher pain crisis severity scores (61.7 vs 50.0 p=0.03). There was no significant difference in scores for pain crisis frequency, pain interference, or other QoL measures (Table). Daily users had similar median annual admissions and emergency room visits to non-daily users (1.0 (IQR 0.25-1.0) vs 2.0 (IQR 0 - 5.0) admissions p=0.3; 1.0 (IQR 0.25-1.75) vs 0 (IQR 0-1.5) ED visits p=0.6) and used similar doses of weekly opioids (274.5 IQR 91.5-3447.9 vs 28.6 IQR 3.03-135.6 mg weekly po morphine equivalents p=0.5). There were no differences in CRP, CBC, CECs or EPCs, or in levels of all neutrophils and monocytes types.
Conclusion: In our pilot study, we found daily marijuana users reported more severe pain crisis, but had similar rates of hospital utilization and similar amounts of opioids dispensed. We posit that patients with more severe pain crisis may use daily marijuana to effectively treat their pain allowing them to have similar hospital and opioid utilization to those with less severe pain. Larger prospective studies should be performed to test these hypotheses.
Display omitted
No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
We describe a Dirichlet multivariable regression method useful for modeling data representing components as a percentage of a total. This model is motivated by the unmet need in psychiatry and other ...areas to simultaneously assess the effects of covariates on the relative contributions of different components of a measure. The model is illustrated using the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for assessment of schizophrenia symptoms which, like many other metrics in psychiatry, is composed of a sum of scores on several components, each in turn, made up of sums of evaluations on several questions. We simultaneously examine the effects of baseline socio-demographic and co-morbid correlates on all of the components of the total PANSS score of patients from a schizophrenia clinical trial and identify variables associated with increasing or decreasing relative contributions of each component. Several definitions of residuals are provided. Diagnostics include measures of overdispersion, Cook’s distance, and a local jackknife influence metric.
Abstract
Background: Breast cancer (BC) patients (pts) with Oncotype Dx recurrence scores (RS) ≤ 25 represent a large fraction of BC cases. The TAILORx study demonstrated that these pts did not ...receive significant benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Despite their low to moderate risk and sensitivity to endocrine therapy, a number of BC pts may benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. The goal of this study is to assess tumor response, utilizing the preoperative endocrine prognostic index (PEPI), to a combination of the mTOR inhibitor everolimus and an aromatase inhibitor (AI) in this pt population. Methods: This is a phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant AI and everolimus in postmenopausal pts with hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2 negative clinical stage II-III BC with low risk RS (≤ 25). Patient enrollment initiated in November 2014 at the Yale Cancer Center/Smilow Cancer Hospital and Care Centers. Key inclusion criteria are ECOG 0-2, adequate organ function, a fasting cholesterol ≤ 300 mg/dl and triglycerides ≤ 2.5 x IULN. Eligible pts received daily AI therapy (anastrozole 1 mg, letrozole 2.5 mg, or exemestane 25 mg) and everolimus 10 mg daily for up to a total of 26 weeks. The primary objective of the study was to determine the percent of postmenopausal pts with clinical stage II-III HR+/HER2- BC and a RS ≤ 25 who achieve a PEPI score of 0 following neoadjuvant AI and everolimus. The secondary objectives are to assess the tolerability and side effect profile, and to identify biologic markers predictive of a PEPI 0. Simon’s optimal two-stage design was utilized with a planned sample size of 27 eligible pts. First, 15 pts will be enrolled, if 5 or more of 15 eligible patients achieve a PEPI 0, the plan is to enroll another 12 pts. If 10 or more of the 27 eligible patients achieve a PEPI 0, we will conclude that the regimen warrants further study. This design has a power of 80% and a one-sided significance level of 0.1. Results: Of the 17 pts initially enrolled, 15 were evaluable for response; 4 of 15 (26%) had a PEPI scores of 0 which did not meet the primary endpoint; 4 (26%) had a path CR and 6 (40%) had PR. Grade 3 toxicities determined to be possibly/probably study related included anemia, anorexia, hypertension, maculopapular rash and hyperglycemia. One pt developed grade 3 atrial flutter and grade 4 QT prolongation which required a dose delay. One pt required hospitalization for pneumonia. Gene expression analysis by RNA seq was performed on 9 baseline (6 pts with CR/PR vs 3 non-responders); 13 post treatment (8 pts with CR/PR vs 5 non-responders) samples with 8 matched pairs (5 pts with CR/PR vs 3 non-responders). Baseline samples from pts who had CR/PR have significantly lower expression of MYC targets and oxidative phosphorylation genes, and significantly higher expression of genes associated with epithelial mesenchymal transition and interferon signaling, in comparison to non-responders. The expression of CYP19A1 gene, that codes aromatase, is significantly increased after therapy in samples from pts with CR/PR (logFC=1.33), but not in other pts. Expression of mTORC1 signaling pathway genes is increased after therapy only in samples from pts with CR/PR. Conclusion: Although this trial did not meet the set primary endpoint, 26% of pts achieved a PEPI 0. The combination of an AI and everolimus was overall well tolerated. Our study suggested that baseline expression levels of key pathways were associated with response to neoadjuvant AI plus everolimus.
Citation Format: Maysa M Abu-Khalaf, Kimberly Aderhold, Michal Marczyk, Gina Chung, Erin Hofstatter, Tara Sanft, Andrea Silber, Michael DiGiovanna, Daniel Zelterman, Lajos Puzstai, Christos Hatzis. Neoadjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy plus the mTOR inhibitor everolimus in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor positive/HER2 negative breast cancer and an oncotype Dx recurrence score (≤25) abstract. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P5-13-02.
PDF
