Well-documented reports of patients’ experiences with different treatments are important for helping localised prostate cancer (LPC) patients choose among the available treatment options.
To document ...differences in patient-reported outcomes (PROs) following radical prostatectomy (RP), external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), brachytherapy (BT), and active surveillance (AS), and to evaluate how these PROs and other factors are associated with treatment decision regret.
A prospective, observational, multicentre study of men diagnosed with LPC (stage cT1–2) during 2014–2016.
Patients completed validated PRO measures (Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 QLQ-C30, Quality of Life Questionnaire prostate cancer–specific module QLQ-PR25, Decision Regret Scale, and the Memorial Anxiety Scale for Prostate Cancer) before treatment and at 3, 6, and 12mo after treatment. Mixed-effect models were used to describe different PRO patterns.
The analytic cohort included 434 men (AS=32%; RP=45%; EBRT=12%; BT=10%). Follow-up response rates were above 90%. At 1-yr follow-up, (1) men who had received RP reported significantly (p<0.01) more urinary incontinence, sexual dysfunction, hormonal/masculinity-related symptoms, and less emotional distress; (2) those having received EBRT reported more sexual dysfunction, hormonal/masculinity-related symptoms, and physical distress; and (3) those having received BT reported more urinary obstruction and irritation symptoms, compared with patients under AS. Irrespective of the treatment modality, 23% of the patients reported clinically relevant treatment regret (99% confidence interval, 17–28%). Multivariate correlates of decision regret were hormonal/masculinity-related symptoms, educational level, and positive surgical margins.
Post-treatment physical and psychosocial functioning was significantly associated with specific treatment modalities and pretreatment functioning. Regret was relatively frequently reported by patients who experienced unwanted physical, psychosocial, and oncological outcomes. Greater efforts should be made to understand whether carefully educating patients about the possible consequences and effectiveness of treatments may help limit the feeling of treatment regret.
In men with localised prostate cancer, regret about the treatment choice was more common among those who experienced more treatment-related symptoms during the year after treatment.
In men with localised prostate cancer, treatment regret was associated with less formal education, experiencing hormonal/masculinity-related symptoms, and/or having positive surgical margins. Efforts are needed to better understand how patients’ expectations, outcomes, and feelings of regret interact.
•Recurrences after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy are mostly local and in-field.•3-yrs local recurrence-free survival was 51% after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy.•3-yrs local ADT-free survival was ...86% after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy.
Radiorecurrent prostate cancer is often confined to the prostate, predominantly near the index lesion. The purpose of this study was to look at recurrence characteristics in patients treated with focal salvage high dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy.
Patients treated with MRI-guided HDR brachytherapy, with a single fraction of 19 Gy from July 2013 to October 2021 as focal salvage treatment, were prospectively included in the current study. Imaging data were collected regarding the occurrence of local, regional and distant recurrences, including location of local recurrences (LR) in relation to the HDR radiotherapy field.
One hundred seventy-five patients were included after focal salvage HDR brachytherapy (median follow-up 36 months (IQR 23–50)). Three-years biochemical recurrence-free survival, LR-free survival, in-field LR-free survival, out-of-field LR-free survival, any-recurrence-free survival and ADT-free survival were 43% (95%CI 34%–52%), 51% (41%–61%), 70% (61%–80%), 92% (88%–97%), 42% (32%–52%) and 86% (80%–92%), respectively. Larger GTV-size and shorter PSA doubling time were associated with in-field LR in multivariable analysis.
After focal salvage HDR brachytherapy with a dose of 1x19 Gy for local prostate cancer recurrence, subsequent recurrences are mostly local and in-field.
•Engaging stakeholders before implementing the complex medical technology is important to promote its relevance, usefulness and effectiveness from multiple perspectives.•Exploring the potential of ...new complex medical technology for professional development and collaboration is essential to get a better picture of its potential value.•Demonstrating the individual and societal effects of the technology over the entire life-cycle will help to understand its long-term impact.
The main factors driving the value of medical treatments are proven effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. This is different for complex medical technologies that combine scientific disciplines, functions or tools in a single solution-oriented method. This short communication provides three recommendations to realize the value of complex medical technologies. It is important to engage stakeholders before technology implementation to promote its relevance from multiple perspectives, to explore opportunities for professional development and collaboration, and to demonstrate the societal effects over the entire life-cycle.
To assess the feasibility of prostate cancer radiotherapy for patients with a hip implant on an 1.5 T MRI-Linac (MRL) in terms of geometrical image accuracy, image quality, and plan quality.
...Pretreatment MRI images on a 1.5 T MRL and 3 T MRI consisting of a T2-weighted 3D delineation scan and main magnetic field homogeneity (
) scan were performed in six patients with a unilateral hip implant. System specific geometrical errors due to gradient nonlinearity were determined for the MRL. Within the prostate and skin contour,
inhomogeneity, gradient nonlinearity error and the total geometrical error (vector summation of the prior two) was determined. Image quality was determined by visually scoring the extent of implant-born image artifacts. A treatment planning study was performed on five patients to quantify the impact of the implant on plan quality, in which conventional MRL IMRT plans were created, as well as plans which avoid radiation through the left or right femur.
The total maximum geometrical error in the prostate was <1 mm and the skin contour <1.7 mm; in all cases the machine-specific gradient error was most dominant. The
error for the MRlinac MRI could partly be predicted based on the pre-treatment 3 T scan. Image quality for all patients was sufficient at 1.5 T MRL. Plan comparison showed that, even with avoidance of the hips, in all cases sufficient target coverage could be obtained with similar D1cc and D5cc to rectum and bladder, while V28Gy was slightly poorer in only the rectum for femur avoidance.
We showed that geometrical accuracy, image quality and plan quality for six prostate patients with a hip implant or hip fixation treated on a 1.5 T MRL did not show relevant deterioration for the used image settings, which allowed safe treatment.
To describe toxicity, biochemical outcome and quality of life after MRI guided focal high dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) in a single fraction of 19 Gy for localized prostate cancer.
Between May ...2013 and April 2016, 30 patients were treated by MRI-guided focal HDR-BT. Patients with visible tumour on MRI were included. All patients were ≥65 years, T-stage <T3, Gleason ≤7, PSA <10 ng/mL and IPSS <15. Focal irradiation was delivered in a single fraction of 19 Gy to the D95 of the clinical target volume. Toxicity was reported using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4. Biochemical failure was defined according to the Phoenix criteria and quality of life was measured using validated questionnaires.
Median follow up was 24 months. One patient developed a grade 2 and 3 GU toxicity after treatment. In the other 29 patients, no grade 2 or higher perioperative complications occurred. Five patients developed a biochemical recurrence. For all measured time points, there was no statistically significant deterioration in quality of life.
Focal MRI guided HDR-BT confers low toxicity rates and maintains quality of life. Biochemical recurrence is rather high, 5 patients developed a biochemical recurrence according to the Phoenix definition. Longer evaluation of these patients is necessary and caution is warranted before implementing focal HDR-BT in patients with localized prostate cancer.
Manual contouring of neurovascular structures on prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is labor-intensive and prone to considerable interrater disagreement. Our aim is to contour neurovascular ...structures automatically on prostate MRI by deep learning (DL) to improve workflow and interrater agreement.
Segmentation of neurovascular structures was performed on pre-treatment 3.0 T MRI data of 131 prostate cancer patients (training n = 105 and testing n = 26). The neurovascular structures include the penile bulb (PB), corpora cavernosa (CCs), internal pudendal arteries (IPAs), and neurovascular bundles (NVBs). Two DL networks, nnU-Net and DeepMedic, were trained for auto-contouring on prostate MRI and evaluated using volumetric Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distances (MSD), Hausdorff distances, and surface DSC. Three radiation oncologists evaluated the DL-generated contours and performed corrections when necessary. Interrater agreement was assessed and the time required for manual correction was recorded.
nnU-Net achieved a median DSC of 0.92 (IQR: 0.90–0.93) for the PB, 0.90 (IQR: 0.86–0.92) for the CCs, 0.79 (IQR: 0.77–0.83) for the IPAs, and 0.77 (IQR: 0.72–0.81) for the NVBs, which outperformed DeepMedic for each structure (p < 0.03). nnU-Net showed a median MSD of 0.24 mm for the IPAs and 0.71 mm for the NVBs. The median interrater DSC ranged from 0.93 to 1.00, with the majority of cases (68.9%) requiring manual correction times under two minutes.
DL enables reliable auto-contouring of neurovascular structures on pre-treatment MRI data, easing the clinical workflow in neurovascular-sparing MR-guided radiotherapy.
•Adapt-to-Shape (ATS) workflows enable high-precision MR-guided radiotherapy.•Online, manual contour adaptation is a time-consuming step in the ATS workflow.•Trained radiation therapists adapt ...contours for prostate cancer treatment.•CTV contours by radiation therapists are well-suited for MR-Linac prostate cancer treatment.
Magnetic resonance (MR)-guided linear accelerator (MR-Linac) systems have changed radiotherapy workflows. The addition of daily online contour adaptation allows for higher precision treatment, but also increases the workload of those involved. We train radiation therapists (RTTs) to perform daily online contour adaptation for MR-Linac treatment of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these prostate contours by performing an interfraction and interobserver analysis.
Clinical target volume (CTV) contours generated online by RTTs from 30 low-intermediate risk PCa patients, treated with 5x7.25 Gy, were used. Two physicians (Observers) judged the RTTs contours and performed adaptations when necessary. Interfraction relative volume differences between the first and the subsequent fractions were calculated for the RTTs, Observer 1, and Observer 2. Additionally, interobserver dice’s similarity coefficient (DSC) for fraction 2–5 was calculated with the RTTs- and physician-adapted contours. Clinical acceptability of the RTTs contours was judged by a third observer.
Mean (SD) online contour adaptation time was 12.6 (±3.8) minutes and overall median (interquartile range IQR) relative volume difference was 9.3% (4.4–13.0). Adaptations by the observers were mostly performed at the apex and base of the prostate. Median (IQR) interobserver DSC between RTTs and Observer 1, RTTs and Observer 2, and Observer 1 and 2 was 0.99 (0.98–1.00), 1.00 (0.98–1.00), and 1.00 (0.99–1.00), respectively. Contours were acceptable for clinical use in 113 (94.2%) fractions. Dose-volume histogram (DVH) analysis showed significant CTV underdosage for one of the seven identified outliers.
Daily online contour adaptation by RTTs is clinically feasible for MR-Linac treatment of PCa.
•Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy enables visualization and dose adaptation of neurovascular structures.•Neurovascular-sparing magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy hypothetically preserves ...erectile function.•Neurovascular-sparing 5×7.25 Gy magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer is feasible.•Extent of neurovascular bundle sparing largely depends on tumor location.
Erectile dysfunction is a common adverse effect of external beam radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer (PCa), likely as a result of damage to neural and vascular tissue. Magnetic resonance-guided online adaptive radiotherapy (MRgRT) enables high-resolution MR imaging and paves the way for neurovascular-sparing approaches, potentially lowering erectile dysfunction after radiotherapy for PCa. The aim of this study was to assess the planning feasibility of neurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa.
Twenty consecutive localized PCa patients, treated with standard 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT, were included. For these patients, neurovascular-sparing 5×7.25 Gy MRgRT plans were generated. Dose constraints for the neurovascular bundle (NVB), the internal pudendal artery (IPA), the corpus cavernosum (CC), and the penile bulb (PB) were established. Doses to regions of interest were compared between the neurovascular-sparing plans and the standard clinical pre-treatment plans.
Neurovascular-sparing constraints for the CC, and PB were met in all 20 patients. For the IPA, constraints were met in 19 (95%) patients bilaterally and 1 (5%) patient unilaterally. Constraints for the NVB were met in 8 (40%) patients bilaterally, in 8 (40%) patients unilaterally, and were not met in 4 (20%) patients. NVB constraints were not met when gross tumor volume (GTV) was located dorsolaterally in the prostate. Dose to the NVB, IPA, and CC was significantly lower in the neurovascular-sparing plans.
Neurovascular-sparing MRgRT for localized PCa is feasible in the planning setting. The extent of NVB sparing largely depends on the patient’s GTV location in relation to the NVB.
In response to Grivas et al van den Berg, Ingeborg; Savenije, Mark H F; Teunissen, Frederik R ...
Physics and imaging in radiation oncology
28
Journal Article
Purpose
Population-based studies on treatment patterns in oncology and corresponding clinical outcomes can help identify strategies towards optimal value for patients. This study was performed to ...describe the variation in treatment patterns and major oncological outcomes for muscle-invasive or metastatic bladder cancer (MIBC/mBC) patients in the Netherlands.
Methods
Patients diagnosed with cT2-4aN0-3M0-1 disease between 2008 and 2016 in seven large teaching hospitals in the Netherlands were included. Baseline characteristics, disease stage, intended and definitive treatment, and oncological outcomes were collected. Patients were categorized based on cTNM-stage: (1) cT2-4aN0M0, (2) cT2-4aN1-3M0 and (3) cT4b and/or M1.
Results
The total study population comprised 1853 patients, of which 1303 patients were diagnosed with cT2-4aN0M0 disease. Overall, curative treatment was intended in 81% (range 74–85%,
P
value = 0.132). Radical cystectomy (RC) and curative radiotherapy (RTx) ranged between hospitals from 42 to 66% and 13 to 27%, respectively (
P
value < 0.001). For 334 patients staged cT4b and/or M1, frequencies for palliative therapy and best supportive care (no anti-cancer therapy) ranged between hospitals from 20 to 54% and 44 to 71%, respectively (
P
value < 0.001). There was no association between hospital site and overall survival (OS) in a univariable and multivariable Cox regression for survival analysis (after adjusting for age and cT-stage), for all three cTNM-groups. Neoadjuvant or induction chemotherapy (NAIC) utilization rates before RC ranged from 8 to 38% (
P
value < 0.001).
Conclusions
There is large inter-hospital variation in treatment intent in MIBC/mBC patients. This variation does not seem to translate to differences in overall survival rates. There is an ongoing trend of increased use of RC. Utilisation of NAIC is relatively low considering European guideline recommendations.