People who inject drugs (PWID) are at high risk of developing injection-related infections, including abscesses. Access to water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) are key human rights and services; yet ...these services have been underexplored as predictors of abscesses among PWID.
Longitudinal analysis was employed among a cohort of PWID to determine if WASH insecurity (lack of access) was associated with abscess incidence in the Tijuana, Mexico and San Diego, United States metropolitan area during 24-months of follow-up survey data from 2020 to 2023. We calculated abscess prevalence at baseline and tracked the incidence of new abscesses among individuals without an abscess during the previous visit. Time dependent Cox regression modeling was employed with variance clustered by participant to characterize the relationship between WASH insecurity and abscess incidence.
At baseline, hand hygiene insecurity, bathing insecurity in the previous six months and open defecation in the last week, were reported by 60 %, 54 % and 38 % of participants, respectively; 21 % reported an abscess in the last six months. The incidence of abscesses was 24.4 (95 %CI: 21.1–27.6) per 100 person-years. After adjusting for covariates, the hazard of developing an abscess remained significantly elevated among individuals using non-improved (with risk of contamination) water sources (e.g., surface water) for preparing drugs (adjusted HR adjHR: 1.49 95 %CI: 1.01–2.21, experiencing bathing insecurity (adjHR: 1.59 95 %CI: 1.12–2.24) and open defecation (adjHR: 1.65 95 %CI: 1.16–2.35).
PWID in the Tijuana-San Diego metropolitan area reported facing high rates of insecurity accessing WASH services. Abscess incidence was higher (four to nine times) than observed rate among PWID cohorts in other settings. Access to continuously available toilet facilities, bathing infrastructure, and safe water sources for preparing drugs for injection could prevent abscesses among PWID. Accessible WASH infrastructure should be ensured among PWID communities and promoted as a key component of harm reduction infrastructure.
Abstract
Background
Staphylococcus
aureus skin and soft tissue infections (SA-SSTIs) are common in healthcare and community settings, and recurrences occur at variable frequency, even after ...successful initial treatment. Knowing the exact burden and timing of recurrent disease is critical to planning and evaluating interventions to prevent recurrent SSTIs.
Methods
In this retrospective study, SSTI cases in patients aged ≥18 years at 3 US medical centers (Columbia, Chicago, Vanderbilt) between 2006 and 2016 were analyzed according to a biennial cohort design. Index SSTIs (with or without key comorbidities), either microbiologically confirmed to be SA-SSTI or not microbiologically tested (NMT-SSTI), were recorded within 1 calendar year and followed up for 12 months for recurrent infections. The number of index cases, proportion of index cases with ≥1 recurrence(s), time to first recurrence, and number of recurrences were collected for both SA-SSTI and NMT-SSTI events.
Results
In the most recent cohorts, 4755 SSTI cases were reported at Columbia, 2873 at Chicago, and 6433 at Vanderbilt. Of these, 452, 153, and 354 cases were confirmed to be due to S. aureus. Most cases were reported in patients without key comorbidities. Across centers, 16.4%–19.0% (SA-SSTI) and 11.0%–19.2% (NMT-SSTI) of index cases had ≥1 recurrence(s). In patients without key comorbidities, more than 60% of index SSTIs with recurrences had only 1 recurrence, half of which occurred in the first 3 months following primary infection.
Conclusions
SA-SSTI recurrences are common among healthy adults and occur in at least 1 in 6 individuals during the 1 year following the primary event.
The number of Staphylococcus aureus skin and soft tissue infections patients recorded at 3 US medical centers during 2006–2016 was stable and lacked key comorbidities. Most patients with recurrences had 1 recurrence, half of which occurred in the first 3 months following primary infection.
•Use of first-line intravenous dalbavancin for cellulitis to prevent admission.•Use of dalbavancin is estimated to have saved 248 bed-days over the study period.•Use of dalbavancin saved $50,485.15 ...overall ($1,529.85 per patient).
Many patients with cellulitis are treated with oral antibiotics as outpatients, but some require hospital admission for intravenous antibiotics. During the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board (BCUHB) in Wales approved use of dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic from April to December 2020 to facilitate early discharge and prevent hospital admission.
To report cost savings and admission avoidance through first-line intravenous use of dalbavancin for cellulitis in one health board in Wales.
Patients with cellulitis who presented to the emergency department (ED) or medical assessment unit (MAU) at BCUHB's two hospitals between April and December 2020 were identified for treatment with dalbavancin, because they had not responded to oral antibiotics or their initial presentation warranted intravenous antibiotics. Patients received 1500mg dalbavancin by intravenous infusion according to prescribing information and were sent home without being admitted. Outcomes were admission within 30 days of dalbavancin and cost savings from avoiding admission.
31 patients were treated with dalbavancin for cellulitis in the ED or MAU. No patient was admitted within 30 days of receiving dalbavancin. Use of dalbavancin is estimated to have saved 248 bed-days over the study period, with an estimated saving of $120,444.23 based on avoidance of admission. The cost of dalbavancin for these 31 patients was $69,959.08, giving an overall cost saving of $50,485.15 ($1,529.95 per patient).
Prescribing dalbavancin as first-line intravenous antibiotic for cellulitis prevents admission, saving bed-days and admission-related costs.
To assess cellulitis in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) setting and identify risk factors for its disease severity and whether cellulitis influences length of stay (LOS).
In this ...retrospective study, patients with cellulitis were identified using the electronic health record while admitted to the NICU at Massachusetts General for Children from January 2007 to December 2020. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from patient records. Two multivariable logistic regression models were constructed to assess for independent predictors for increased LOS (≥30 days) and complicated cellulitis in the hospital.
Eighty-four patients met the study criteria; 46.4% were older than 14 days at the time of diagnosis of cellulitis, 61.9% were non-White, and 83.3% were born prematurely; 48.8% had complicated cellulitis as defined by overlying hardware (41.7%), sepsis (7.1%), requirement for broadened antibiotic coverage (7.1%), bacteremia (4.8%), and/or abscess (3.6%). The mean hospital LOS was 58.5 ± 36.1 days SD, with 72.6% having a LOS greater than 30 days. Independent predictors of increased LOS were extreme prematurity (<28 weeks’ gestation) (OR: 14.7, P = .03), non-White race (OR: 5.7, P = .03), and complicated cellulitis (OR: 6.4, P = .03). No significant predictors of complicated cellulitis were identified.
This study identifies complicated cellulitis in the NICU as an independent predictor of increased hospital LOS in neonates. Implementation of strategies to mitigate the development of cellulitis may decrease LOS among this high-risk population.
Roseomonas species have been recognized to cause infections in immunocompromised individuals. The purpose of this study was to systemically review all published cases of Roseomonas infections in ...humans and describe the epidemiology, microbiology, antimicrobial susceptibility, treatment and outcomes of these infections in humans. We performed a systematic review of PubMed (through 20
th
Octrober 2019) for studies providing epidemiological, clinical, microbiological as well as treatment data and outcomes of Roseomonas species infections. A total of 37 studies, containing data of 99 patients, were included in the analysis. The most common Roseomonas infections were those of the bloodstream in 74.7% (74 patients), musculoskeletal infections in 8.1% (8 patients), skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) and peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis in 6.1% (6 patients) each. Epidemiology of these infections differed, with bacteremias being more prevalent in patients with malignancy and central venous lines, musculoskeletal infections being more prevalent after orthopedic surgery, and SSTIs occurring without any reported underlying cause. Resistance to beta-lactams was very high with penicillin, piperacillin/tazobactam resistance and cephalosporin resistance at 96.6%, 90.7% and 77.8% respectively, while quinolone resistance was 9.1%. Quinolones, carbapenems and cephalosporins are the most common agents used for treatment, irrespectively of the infection site. Overall mortality was 3% (3 patients), with the mortality attributed to Roseomonas being at 1% (1 patient).
Eight hot topics regarding the diagnosis and management of bacterial skin infections were selected and reviewed by five experts from different European countries, chosen based on their expertise in ...microbiology, infectious diseases, and dermatology. As noninfectious skin diseases/conditions such as atopic dermatitis can be complicated by infections, including Acute Bacterial Skin and Skin Structure Infections (ABSSSI), a collaboration between dermatologists and infectious disease specialists can promote a rational approach to diagnosis and a more functional treatment approach, especially for complicated infections. In addition, an important role would be played by microbiologists as they are crucial for the isolation and classification of the bacterial pathogen to guide clinicians toward the most effective antibiotic therapy. Although there are many therapeutic options for the treatment of bacterial skin infections, including those due to methicillin‐resistant Staphylococcus aureus, these drugs often require multiple daily administrations leading to patient noncompliance and are associated with gastrointestinal adverse events and drug resistance. With their characteristics of being long‐acting, safety and single‐dose regimens, long‐acting antibiotics, such as dalbavancin and oritavancin, represent an effective alternative that could change the management of these infections with a considerable reduction of hospitalisation costs and risks.
Methicillin-resistant strains of S. aureus (MRSA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) testing is a laboratory test that allows for rapid detection of MRSA and is available to use in skin infections via ...wound swab. There are limited data demonstrating the utility of MRSA PCR wound swabs on clinical outcomes in skin and soft tissue infections. This retrospective, single-center study included 652 patients to determine if the use of a MRSA PCR wound swab in skin infections results in a more rapid de-escalation in antibiotics. Patients with a MRSA PCR negative wound swab demonstrated a 1.0 (-1.5 to -0.53) day reduction of anti-MRSA antibiotic usage compared to those in the control group who did not have a MRSA PCR available (wound culture data only) (P < 0.001, unadjusted). The results of this study demonstrate that MRSA PCR wound swab assays have the potential to play a significant role in antibiotic de-escalation in the setting of skin and soft tissue infections.
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is a considerable pathogen in the setting of skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs). MRSA PCR swab testing is widely used in the setting of respiratory ...tract infections, however little data exists relating to the use of MRSA PCR swab testing in SSTIs. Three thousand, nine hundred and ninety-five patients were included in this retrospective study that aimed to validate the clinical correlation of MRSA PCR wound swab testing in SSTIs through sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value (PPV) analysis. From this review, MRSA PCR wound swabs were found to have a sensitivity of 97.6% (97.5–98.5), a specificity of 94.9% (94.3–95.7), a PPV of 92.3% (91.4–93.2), and a NPV of 98.4% (98.0–98.8). The study results demonstrate that the MRSA SSTI PCR assays have a high NPV and the potential to be a vital tool in de-escalating antimicrobial therapy associated with SSTIs.
Ceftobiprole medocaril is an advanced-generation cephalosporin prodrug that has qualified infectious disease product status granted by the US FDA and is currently being evaluated in phase 3 clinical ...trials in patients with acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSIs) and in patients with
bacteremia. In this study, the activity of ceftobiprole and comparators was evaluated against more than 7,300 clinical isolates collected in the United States from 2016 through 2018 from patients with skin and skin structure infections. The major species/pathogen groups were
(53%),
(23%),
(7%), beta-hemolytic streptococci (6%),
spp. (4%), and coagulase-negative staphylococci (2%). Ceftobiprole was highly active against
(MIC
, 0.5/1 mg/liter; 99.7% susceptible by EUCAST criteria; 42% methicillin-resistant
MRSA). Ceftobiprole also exhibited potent activity against other Gram-positive cocci. The overall susceptibility of
to ceftobiprole was 84.8% (>99.0% susceptible for isolate subsets that exhibited a non-extended-spectrum β-lactamase ESBL phenotype). A total of 74.4% of
, 100% of beta-hemolytic streptococci and coagulase-negative staphylococci, and 99.6% of
isolates were inhibited by ceftobiprole at ≤4 mg/liter. As expected, ceftobiprole was largely inactive against
that contained ESBL genes and
Overall, ceftobiprole was highly active against most clinical isolates from the major Gram-positive and Gram-negative skin and skin structure pathogen groups collected at U.S. medical centers participating in the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program during 2016 to 2018. The broad-spectrum activity of ceftobiprole, including potent activity against MRSA, supports its further evaluation for a potential ABSSSI indication.
This study examines the impacts of a skin and soft tissue infection (SSTI) management program involving a rapid diagnostic algorithm (Gram stain plus real-time PCR, GeneXpert® MRSA/SA SSTI) performed ...directly on clinical samples plus antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) counseling of the responsible physician.
Participants were 155 consecutive adult inpatients with SSTI and good quality clinical samples submitted to the microbiology laboratory from April 2016 to January 2017. Results of the rapid test and AMS recommendations were phoned through to the responsible physician. The comparison group was a historical cohort.
Most SSTI were surgical wound infections (41.3% vs 38.1% for the intervention and comparison groups respectively) followed by diabetic foot (14.2% and 18.1%), abscesses (13.5% both) and cellulitis (12.9% both). Isolated microorganisms were mostly Gram-negative bacilli (two-thirds), followed by Staphylococcus aureus (SA). The ratio methicillin-susceptible SA (MSSA) to methicillin-resistant SA (MRSA) was 4:1. Improvements in the intervention cohort were: DOT (22.0 vs. 24.3 days, p = 0.007), treatment duration per SSTI episode (14.1 vs. 15.0 days, p = 0.072), treatment cost (433.1 vs. 533.3 €, p = 0.039), length of stay (18.6 vs 20.7 days, p = 0.031), related mortality (1 vs. 4 patients, p = 0.022) and Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) (4 vs. 8 patients, p = 0.050). In 48 cases (31.4%) in the intervention group, advice was given to improve empiric antibiotic treatment.
This type of program could help adjust antibiotic treatment when inappropriate, reducing antibiotic use and costs, length of stay, CDI and related mortality.