Članek bo predstavil vpliv, ki ga je imel slovenski pesnik Tomaž Šalamun (1941–2014, Slovenija) na poezijo brazilskega pesnika srednje generacije Narlana Matosa (1975, Itaquara, Bahia): osvetlil bo ...kontekst njunega srečanja in Šalamunov prvi vstop v brazilski literarni svet ter orisal prevajalsko in pesniško izmenjavo obeh avtorjev, prvine literarnega stika med dvema poetikama ter medbesedilne interakcije, ki se zrcalijo v poetiki brazilskega pesnika Matosa, zlasti v njegovi tretji zbirki Elegija novemu svetu in druge pesmi (Elegia ao novo mundo e outros poemas, 2012), v kateri se sklicevanje na Šalamuna udejanji zlasti v pesmi Pismo Slovencu. Matosov dialog s Šalamunovo poezijo poteka v nekaj ključnih točkah: v asociativnih preskokih in ludizmu ter v iskanju in posnemanju tipičnih ritmičnih vzorcev Šalamunovega verza in njegove glasbenosti.
The article researches the concept of transnationality on the basis of American theoretical sources and tries to connect it closely to the study of modern and contemporary poetry. Among several ...challenges of the transnational approach, the concept of the nation is mentioned as an important element, in addition to global connectedness, as is the importance of studying transnational contacts with all involved cultures in mind. Tomaž Šalamun and Charles Simic, two poets who have found success and a positive reception in the other culture, are given as examples of a transnational contact between Slovenia and the U.S. To explain and closely study this contact, the article offers an overview of the characteristics of both poetics, which have made both poets attractive for American or Slovenian critics and readers. Translation, its impossibility and urgency, is mentioned as the central activity that creates transnational moments between cultures.
Med deli verjetno najboljšega poznavalca slovenske dramatike in njenega prvega teoretika Tarasa Kermaunerja je mogoče najti tudi en sam dramski poskus: sodno razpravo o vrednosti avantgardistične ...poezije na primeru obtoženega pesnika Tomaža Šalamuna. Sicer gledališko zelo uporabno zvrst sodnega disputa Kermauner zanimivo razvije, zaključi pa jo s popolnoma antidramskim, antiklimaktičnim sklepom, s katerim preloži odločanje o stvari na drugi časoprostor. Natančnejši pregled besedila razkrije različne konceptualne nedoslednosti, ki jih je mogoče zajeti s pojmom paradoksa. V tekstu je bilo tako mogoče izslediti pet točk, ki bi jih bilo mogoče definirati kot paradoksne, in sicer zadevajo vsebinske kategorije, kot so bistvo umetnosti, vprašanja naroda za umetnost, umetnosti in marksizma ter življenja kot vrhovne estetske kategorije, zadnji paradoks pa je formalen, saj sodna razprava s svojim zaključkom izzveni popolnoma v prazno: ne glede na dovolj izrazito in ostro predstavitev stališč obeh protagonistov, Toživca in Branivca, se Kermauner odloči – namesto za stopnjevanje konflikta do (gledališkega) vrhunca – za razvodenitev disputa na podlagi vključitve občinstva in ugotovitve, da se slednje v vlogi porote ne more odločiti za nobeno od strani. (Raz)rešitev dileme o (nacionalni, umetniški) kvaliteti avantgardistične poezije tako preostane – vsej pirotehniki Kermaunerjeve gledališke sodne razprave navkljub – prihodnosti in literarni teoriji.
Med deli verjetno najboljšega poznavalca slovenske dramatike in njenega prvega teoretika Tarasa Kermaunerja je mogoče najti tudi en sam dramski poskus: sodno razpravo o vrednosti avantgardistične ...poezije na primeru obtoženega pesnika Tomaža Šalamuna. Sicer gledališko zelo uporabno zvrst sodnega disputa Kermauner zanimivo razvije, zaključi pa jo s popolnoma antidramskim, antiklimaktičnim sklepom, s katerim preloži odločanje o stvari na drugi časoprostor. Natančnejši pregled besedila razkrije različne konceptualne nedoslednosti, ki jih je mogoče zajeti s pojmom paradoksa. V tekstu je bilo tako mogoče izslediti pet točk, ki bi jih bilo mogoče definirati kot paradoksne, in sicer zadevajo vsebinske kategorije, kot so bistvo umetnosti, vprašanja naroda za umetnost, umetnosti in marksizma ter življenja kot vrhovne estetske kategorije, zadnji paradoks pa je formalen, saj sodna razprava s svojim zaključkom izzveni popolnoma v prazno: ne glede na dovolj izrazito in ostro predstavitev stališč obeh protagonistov, Toživca in Branivca, se Kermauner odloči – namesto za stopnjevanje konflikta do (gledališkega) vrhunca – za razvodenitev disputa na podlagi vključitve občinstva in ugotovitve, da se slednje v vlogi porote ne more odločiti za nobeno od strani. (Raz)rešitev dileme o (nacionalni, umetniški) kvaliteti avantgardistične poezije tako preostane – vsej pirotehniki Kermaunerjeve gledališke sodne razprave navkljub – prihodnosti in literarni teoriji.
Among the works of Taras Kermauner, probably the biggest expert on Slovenian drama and its first theoretician, one can also find a single dramatic experiment: a courtroom debate on the value of ...avant-garde poetry, based on the case of the accusation against the poet Tomaž Šalamun. While Kermauner develops the genre of judicial disputation in a theatrically fitting and interesting way, he undermines the disputation with an anticlimactic, anti-dramatic conclusion that postpones the decision on the matter to another space-time. A closer examination of the text reveals several conceptual inconsistencies that can be better understood as paradoxes. Thus, the five points that might be defined as paradoxical could be traced in the text itself concerning substantive categories such as the essence of art, the meaning of a nation for art, art and Marxism, and life as the supreme aesthetic category, while the last paradox is a more formal one, since the courtroom debate, with its conclusion, does not reach any point whatsoever. Regardless of the sufficiently clear and pointed presentation of the positions of the two protagonists, the Prosecutor and the Defender, Kermauner decides, rather than escalating the conflict to a (theatrical) climax, to dilute the disputation based on the inclusion of the audience and the conclusion that the latter, in its role as jury, cannot decide for either side. The (dis)solution of the dilemma of the (national, artistic) quality of avant-garde poetry is thus left – despite the fireworks of Kermauner’s theatrical courtroom debate – to the future and literary theory.
Provider: - Institution: - Data provided by Europeana Collections- Entrance to the premises of the Public Fund for Cultural Activities, where the Tomaž Šalamun Poetry Centre is situated, 2017- All ...metadata published by Europeana are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, Europeana requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources including Europeana
Provider: - Institution: - Data provided by Europeana Collections- The interior of the Tomaž Šalamun Poetry Centre, containing the late Šalamun's collection of books, 2016- All metadata published by ...Europeana are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, Europeana requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources including Europeana
Provider: - Institution: - Data provided by Europeana Collections- One of the many bookshelfs at Tomaž Šalamun Poetry Centre, where a few thousand books collected by the late poet Tomaž Šalamun are ...being kept, 2017- All metadata published by Europeana are available free of restriction under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. However, Europeana requests that you actively acknowledge and give attribution to all metadata sources including Europeana
PDF
