Abstract
Background
In assessing the global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on society, it is important to understand the communities most affected and develop methods of support. Family carers ...provide a vital, yet often invisible role in our society and healthcare system. Identifying research priorities for carers helps establish overall gaps in the research agenda and increases awareness of the role of carers in the community.
Methods
A priority setting partnership methodology was engaged and through collaboration with carers, healthcare professionals and researchers, a participatory process was conducted to identify gaps in the current literature and prioritise research questions and uncertainties. Focus group discussions followed, the first consisted of family carers (n = 5). The second (n = 3) interviewed stakeholders namely healthcare professionals, researchers and policy makers. After collating the data, researchable questions were developed through an iterative process with a Multi Stakeholder Advisory Committee to identify the top 10 research priorities for Family Carers Ireland.
Results
The top 10 researchable questions were distilled from a list of 16 and fit into 7 broad categories. 1) economic impact and financial strain 2) Systemic issues, education, resources and policy 3) technology 4) support services and infrastructure 5) mental health and wellbeing of the carer 6) carers in society 7) Recognition and acknowledgment of the family carer.
Conclusion
The partnership focus of this project allowed the ‘ground-up’ development of research priorities for carers by carers. The COVID-19 pandemic served to magnify systemic issues already present in society, as well as highlight new burdens. As a result, the subsequent development of 10 researchable questions will guide further investigation to improve the support and wellbeing of family carers.
Abstract
Background
Older people have been disproportionately affected by the COVID-19 pandemic with reports suggesting that many older people deferred seeking healthcare during the pandemic due to ...fear of contracting COVID-19.
The aim of this study was to examine trends of emergency department (ED) use by older people during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic compared to previous years.
Methods
The study site is a 1,000-bed university teaching hospital with annual ED new-patient attendance of >50,000.
All ED presentations of patients aged ≥70 years from March–August 2020, 2019 and 2018 inclusive (n = 13,989) were reviewed and compared for presenting complaint, Manchester Triage Score, and admission/discharge decision.
Results
There was a 16% reduction in presentations across the 6 months in 2020 compared to the average of 2018/2019. On average 4 fewer people aged ≥70 years presented to the ED per day in 2020.
Much of this was concentrated in March (33% fewer presentations) and April (31% fewer presentations), when the country was in ‘lockdown’, i.e. non-essential journeys were banned.
There was a 20% reduction in patients presenting with stroke and cardiac complaints.
In the three months following easing of restrictions, there was a 25% increase in falls and orthopaedic injuries when compared to 2018/2019.
Conclusion
This study demonstrates a significant decline in the number of older people presenting to the ED for unscheduled care, including for potentially time-dependent illnesses such as stroke or cardiac complaints.
Presenting to the ED remains the most frequent route by which unwell older people access acute hospital care and it is vitally important that they continue to do so in a timely manner when necessary. Given the possibility of further lockdowns and restrictions, this message needs to be communicated to older people clearly by healthcare professionals and governmental bodies to mitigate against adverse outcomes related to delayed or deferred care.
Abstract
Background
‘What Matters to You’(WMTY) is a routine question in the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) of the frail older person. The aim was to categorise WMTY and investigate changes ...during COVID-19.
Methods
WMTY, clinical frailty score (CFS), age, gender, vision and hearing impairment, malnutrition risk, modified Barthel Index (mBI), living alone status, 4AT and dementia screening results were prospectively entered onto MS Excel. Answers were retrospectively categorised and compared, pre-COVID-19 (April to June 2019) and during COVID-19 (April to June 2020). Descriptive statistics and MS Excel T-test were used for data analysis.
Results
The mean CFS (5), age (82 years), male: female ratio (1:1.3), prevalence of visual and hearing impairment (20–30%) and malnutrition risk were similar (23%) in both groups mBI was non-significantly reduced by a 1 point average during COVID-19.
Less patients lived alone during COVID-19 (p = 0.05). Positive delirium screen doubled (12% vs 26%) during COVID-19. Positive dementia screen doubled (10% vs 20%) during COVID-19.
Themes in decreasing order were family, health, home, functional independence, pets, discharge plan, religion, work, social activities and other pre-COVID-19. Family and health accounted for 49% of responses.
During COVID-19, the order changed to health, family and home, functional independence, work and discharge planning, pets, religion and social activities.
There was a 50% increase in functional independence as a response, a 40% increase in home and a 58% decrease in family as a response.
Conclusion
Cognitive vulnerability doubled during COVID-19. Nine themes were identified. WMTY themes shifted during COVID-19. Health become the most frequent response. Family became a less frequent response with less people living alone. Functional independence was more frequent reflecting the need for self-reliance during COVID-19. Home, where all COVID-19 life was lived, was expressed as WMTY by a greater number of respondents. Promotion of functional independence has been identified as a key driver for practice change.
Abstract
Background
Cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are consistently ranked among the leading causes of death among older adults in Ireland. COVID-19 and influenza infection are associated with ...cardiovascular complications. However, percentage of deaths caused by CVD among adults aged 75 and over in Ireland decreased from 32.9% to 31.0% from 2019 to 2020. Government-imposed social distancing measures resulted in abolition of influenza activity (IA). We analysed population data from the 2010/11–2019/20 influenza seasons to estimate the impact of reduced IA on CVD mortality rates during the COVID-19 pandemic season.
Methods
Quarterly mortality data for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and cerebrovascular disease from first quarter (Q1) 2010 to fourth quarter (Q4) 2020 was obtained from the Central Statistics Office. Weekly data on influenza-like illness (ILI) rates and positive percentages (PP) (i.e. proportion of influenza-positive sentinel respiratory specimens) from week 40 2010 to week 20 2020 was obtained from the Health Protection Surveillance Centre. Excess mortality rate during influenza season was calculated as the percentage difference between Q4/Q1 and preceding third quarter (Q3) mortality rates. We adopted the Goldstein index (ILI rate × PP) as an indicator of IA. Time series analyses, Pearson correlation coefficients (r) and linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationships between IA and excess AMI and cerebrovascular disease mortality rates.
Results
Statistically significant positive associations were observed between IA and excess AMI (r = 0.557, p = 0.011) and cerebrovascular disease (r = 0.858, p < 0.001) mortality rates. Linear regression models predicted 0.072% (95% confidence interval 0.019%, 0.125%) and 0.095% (0.067%, 0.123%) increases in excess AMI and cerebrovascular disease mortality rates respectively per unit increase in IA levels.
Conclusion
Elimination of IA may have contributed towards limiting the effects of COVID-19 on CVD mortality rates, and consequently total excess mortality, among older adults in Ireland.
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic forced healthcare management to make structural adaptations in the interest of infection control. One such adaptation is the introduction of ward-based ...medical teams. The multidisciplinary team (MDT) is one of the cornerstones of geriatric medicine. Therefore, we aimed to explore the perception of the care of the older person MDT on the introduction of ward-based medical teams.
Methods
Qualitative data was collected on a geriatric ward in October 2020 via written questionnaire. The questionnaire analysed how the transition to ward based medical teams was perceived in terms of inter-professional collaboration and clinical service delivered to patients.
Results
There were 14 respondents, 10 of whom were nursing staff (71%). 86% strongly agreed that the medical team was more accessible, with most interactions occurring face-to-face. Patient care and safety was thought to have improved, 79% and 71% of respondents respectively. 93% felt they had a better rapport with the medical team. 71% felt the MDT meeting is more effective, 57% believed the meeting had greater impact on patient care.
However, 93% felt there was less workspace. 21% believed there were more daily admissions and 57% felt the majority of patient transfers from other wards were inappropriate.
Overall 86% favoured ward-based medical teams, with 57% of staff reporting that the change led to increased personal job satisfaction.
Conclusion
By increasing the geographic proximity of doctors to other professionals, doctors were more accessible, issues were tackled quicker, and there was less time wasted bleeping medical teams. Overall staff favoured a ward-based system. However, there are challenges implementing this system. Particular attention should be paid to the availability of adequate workspace, including telephones and computers. Ward transfers should be minimized as continuity of care can be compromised. Strategies should be implemented so medical charts are available to the MDT during consultant-led ward rounds.
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic has disproportionately affected older adults, both in morbidity and mortality1. The effects of the pandemic go beyond contracting the SARS-CoV-2 virus, ...leading to devastating consequences, particularly for individuals over the age of 60. In Ireland, isolation in older adults was exacerbated by cocooning measures and geographical limitations. The purpose of this study was to explore the relationship between loneliness, frailty, and the utilisation of health services in a sample of sexagenarians in Ireland.
Methods
Adults aged 60–70 attending COVID-19 vaccine appointments at a Level 3 Hospital in Ireland (n = 75) were invited to participate in a 36-item questionnaire. Participants reported demographic information and questions regarding physical well-being, healthcare utilisation, lifestyle and behaviours, and impact of vaccination. The survey also included three validated questionnaires: PRISMA-7 for frailty, SARC-F for sarcopenia, and the UCLA 3-Item Loneliness Scale (UCLA-3ILS).
Results
Of the 75 survey respondents, the mean age was 63.2. 72% (n = 54) identified as female. 28% (n = 21) reported that they had been cocooning during the past year. While 84% (n = 63) of respondents reported that they cancelled routine medical appointments during the pandemic, none reported avoiding attending hospital. Five respondents met the criteria for frailty and four were identified as probable sarcopenic. There was no significant difference (p = 0.64) in mean scores on the UCLA 3-ILS between frail and non-frail individuals. Persons identified as sarcopenic were more likely to have higher scores on the UCLA-3ILS (p = 0.0005).
Conclusion
This research highlights the multifaceted relationship between frailty, loneliness, and healthcare utilisation among Irish adults ages 60–70 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Future research in program, policy, and intervention development for at-risk older adults, particularly those who are frail, sarcopenic, and/or lonely, can work to reduce associated negative outcomes.
Reference
1. Kang S-J and Jung, SI. (2020). Age-Related Morbidity and Mortality among Patients with COVID-19. Infect Chemother., 52(2): 154–164.
Abstract
Background
The COVID-19 pandemic is recognised as having a significant impact on older people, particularly on those within nursing homes. Prior to the pandemic, a significant focus was ...placed on the application of a social model of care within nursing homes. We know that COVID-19 has required the stringent application of infection prevention and control measures as well as the provision of increased amounts of clinical care. This has resulted in the recent stronger application of a medical model of care within nursing homes.
Methods
A roundtable event attended by twenty-six people took place. Attendees represented clinical Gerontology, the Irish College of General Practitioner, Sage Family Forum, The Health Information and Quality Authority, Nursing Homes Ireland and nursing home providers. A number of presentations were made, and a roundtable discussion took place about the model of nursing home care post pandemic. Key messages from presentations and the discussion were captured. A report was compiled and shared with attendees to check for accuracy.
Results
The following key messages were identified:
1. Social care is a cornerstone of nursing home care
2. Increased integration of nursing homes within the wider health and social care system is required
3. Increased access to services for nursing home residents is required
4. Regulatory reform is required
5. Resourcing of nursing home care needs to be appropriately addressed
6. The nursing home sector need to be included in conversations around policy and service development affecting nursing home care in Ireland.
Conclusion
Nursing homes are an essential part of the healthcare system in Ireland and have been shown to be adaptable throughout the course of the pandemic. A one size fits all approach is an unlikely fit for purpose approach as we look towards the future with COVID-19.
Abstract
Background
The WHO declared COVID-19 a pandemic in March 2020. Specific public health measures were implemented for older adults who were advised to ‘cocoon’. While this has a positive ...effect on disease spread, reduced activity increases the risk of falls and fractures as well as all-cause mortality 1. The New Mobility Score(NMS) stratifies patients according to pre-fracture mobility and predicts 6-month functional level and 1-year mortality 2. Using the NMS, we evaluated patient mobility pre and post-restrictions. We also obtained basic data, frequency of falls and Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS).
Methods
We prospectively studied 50 patients admitted with a fracture and reviewed by our Orthogeriatric team between August–October 2020.
Results
Mean age was 80 years range 53–99, 41(82%) were over 70 years and 43 (86%) were female. A hip fracture, 39 (78%) was the most common admission and mean CFS was 4 Range 1–7 classifying the cohort as mildly frail. Mean NMS was significantly lower post-restrictions compared to pre-restrictions 5 SD 2.19 vs 6.5 SD 2.15 P = 0.0074. There was no difference in falls pre and post-restrictions 1.1 S.D 2.3 vs 1.9 S.D 1.9 P = 0.0609.
Conclusion
Our study shows that in a vulnerable cohort, COVID-19 restrictions have significantly impacted mobility over a short time period. As a result, our patients are less likely to regain pre-fracture functional level and are at increased risk of all-cause mortality. As further restrictions are implemented, public health strategies for older adults should be prioritised to maintain mobility and prevent adverse outcomes.
References
1. Cunningham C et al. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;00:1–12. 10.1111/sms.13616.
2. Kristensen MT et al. Prefracture functional level evaluated by the New Mobility Score predicts in-hospital outcome after hip fracture surgery. Acta Orthop. 2010;81(3):296–302. 10.3109/17453674.2010.487240.
Abstract
Background
The COVID19 pandemic highlighted deficiencies in information exchange in nursing handover in an intermediate care unit, based in a 30 bed independent care home, into which the ...hospital organisation assigns a multidisciplinary team to provide post-acute care rehabilitation for adults. Mean length of stay is 20 days and > 75% return home. Weekly bed turnover is approximately 15%. A revised electronic template was developed to complement an Intermediate Care Framework already in use, based on National Audit of Intermediate Care quality indicators.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews with nursing leaders and a weighted questionnaire for the whole nursing team were used to determine baseline levels of confidence around aspects of nursing handover.
An Ishikawa diagram analysed factors contributing to poor documentation and communication. The ‘Chain Of Care’ vision for care home environments incorporated the need for microsystem-tailored, standardised, integrated nursing handover. Four iterations occurred. A post-implementation weighted questionnaire collated qualitative information on confidence change.
Results
Areas of greatest ‘swing’ towards INCREASED or SLIGHTLY INCREASED confidence around...: 70%, addressing questions from residents or relatives; 70%, responding to change in a resident’s health status; 70%, giving handover to ambulance crew or doctor or fellow nurse.
Conclusion
Categorical selections across multiple information domains enabled increased/slightly increased confidence in the nursing team in the quality of the information exchanged in nursing handover in an intermediate care rehabilitation care-home setting. Focussed, free-text options permit narrative if required.
A shared electronic template facilitated accessibility and live-time editing in an environment with relatively higher bed-turnover and frequently changing functional mobility and care needs of residents.
Tailoring the nursing handover to the intermediate care environment with mitigation of variation of information provision/accessibility/language were considered in the iterations. Versions are reposited for inspectors.
Abstract
Background
The COVID19 pandemic highlighted deficiencies in information exchange around treatment escalation plans (TEP) in an intermediate care unit, based in a 30 bed independent care ...home, into which the hospital organisation assigns medical, pharmacy, physiotherapy, occupational therapy and social work teams to provide post-acute care rehabilitation for adults. Mean length of stay is 20 days and > 75% return home. Weekly bed turnover is approximately 15%.
TEP documentation is a component of RESTORE2 use, as recommended in the British Geriatric Society Good Practice Guide for Managing COVID19 in Care Homes.
Methods
Semi-structured interviews with nursing leaders and a weighted questionnaire for the whole nursing team were used to determine baseline levels of confidence around aspects of TEP.
An Ishikawa diagram analysed factors contributing to poor documentation and communication. The ‘Chain Of Care’ vision for care home environments incorporated the need for a TEP. Three iterations occurred. A post-implementation weighted questionnaire collated qualitative information on confidence change.
Results
Areas of greatest ‘swing’ towards INCREASED or SLIGHTLY INCREASED confidence around...: 90%, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) status clarity; 90%, treatment ‘ceiling of care’ e.g. ‘conveyance to the Emergency Department in any situation that the clinical team deem necessary’; 40%, conversations with out-of-hours services/external clinicians around appropriate actions; 30%, conversations with nominated persons around appropriate actions.
Conclusion
The TEP incorporates more than just CPR status and contributed to increased nursing team confidence in responding to the acutely deteriorating adult appropriately in a care home environment. Clear documentation of: capacity assessment; patient prioritisation (using ReSPECT principles); and agreed treatment escalation and limitation, enabled information exchange. Standardisation of language, and cross-fertilisation with Nursing Handover, facilitated conversations with external clinicians and nominated persons.
Tailoring the TEP to the care-home environment and rendering it generalisable to non-intermediate care, non-geriatrician supported care home microsystems was considered in the iterations.