Summary Oral corticosteroids (OCS) are a key part of therapy regimens for a diverse variety of conditions. Despite their efficacy, they are associated with a wide variety of adverse events. The ...purpose of this review was to identify the range of adverse events that have been reported to be related to oral corticosteroids, examine the factors that influence their incidence and estimate the economic burden caused by these adverse events. In 61 identified studies, 21 different categories of OCS related adverse events were reported with increased fracture risk being the category most frequently described. Most studies that examined factors linked to the incidence of OCS related adverse events found that dose, age, gender, duration of use, treatment history, smoking habits or cholesterol level were influential in determining risk. Additionally, a cumulative economic analysis of selected adverse events found the annual cost of treating these events in the UK to be at least £165 per patient taking OCS. The clinical and economic burden of OCS related adverse events highlights the need for OCS sparing therapies to be developed.
Vaccine hesitancy has been a growing challenge for public health in recent decades. Among factors contributing to vaccine hesitancy, concerns regarding vaccine safety and Adverse Events (AEs) play ...the leading role. Moreover, cognitive biases are critical in connecting such concerns to vaccine hesitancy behaviors, but their role has not been comprehensively studied. In this study, our first objective is to address concerns regarding vaccine AEs to increase vaccine acceptance. Our second objective is to identify the potential cognitive biases connecting vaccine hesitancy concerns to vaccine-hesitant behaviors and identify the mechanism they get triggered in the vaccine decision-making process.
First, to mitigate concerns regarding AEs, we quantitatively analyzed the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) from 2011 to 2018 and provided evidence regarding the non-severity of the AEs that can be used as a communicable summary to increase vaccine acceptance. Second, we focused on the vaccination decision-making process. We reviewed cognitive biases and vaccine hesitancy literature to identify the most potential cognitive biases that affect vaccine hesitancy and categorized them adopting the Precaution Adoption Process Model (PAPM).
Our results show that the top frequent AEs are expected mild reactions like injection site erythema (4.29%), pyrexia (3.66%), and injection site swelling (3.21%). 94.5% of the reports are not serious and the average population-based serious reporting rate over the 8 years was 25.3 reports per 1 million population. We also identified 15 potential cognitive biases that might affect people's vaccination decision-making and nudge them toward vaccine hesitancy. We categorized these biases based on the factors that trigger them and discussed how they contribute to vaccine hesitancy.
This paper provided an evidence-based communicable summary of VAERS. As the most trusted sources of vaccine information, health practitioners can use this summary to provide evidence-based vaccine information to vaccine decision-makers (patients/parents) and mitigate concerns over vaccine safety and AEs. In addition, we identified 15 potential cognitive biases that might affect the vaccination decision-making process and nudge people toward vaccine hesitancy. Any plan, intervention, and message to increase vaccination uptake should be modified to decrease the effect of these potential cognitive biases.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
ObjectivesTo evaluate outcome measures, methods of assessment, and analysis in clinical studies on the prevention and management of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis.MethodsSystematic ...electronic searches (CENTRAL/MEDLINE/SCOPUS) up to April 2021 were conducted to identify longitudinal clinical studies with ≥10 patients on either the prevention or management of peri‐implant diseases. Outcome measures of this analysis were the choice of outcome measures, methods of assessment, and analytical methods. Risk of bias was evaluated according to study design. Data were extracted into evidence tables and outcomes were analysed in a descriptive manner.ResultsThe analysis of the 159 selected studies revealed that probing pocket depth (PPD) and bleeding/suppuration on probing (BOP) were reported in 89% and 87% of all studies, respectively. Additional outcome measures included plaque scores (reported in 64% of studies), radiographic outcomes (49%), soft tissue dimensions (34%), and composite outcomes (26%). Adverse events (8%) and patient‐reported outcomes (6%) were only rarely mentioned. A primary outcome measure was clearly defined only in 36% of studies. Data on PPD, radiographic outcomes, and soft tissue dimensions were primarily reported as mean values and rarely as frequency distributions. For radiographic outcomes and soft tissue dimensions, it was frequently unclear how clustered data were handled.ConclusionsPPD and BOP were routinely reported in studies on the prevention and management of peri‐implant mucositis and peri‐implantitis, while composite outcomes, adverse events, and patient‐reported outcomes were only infrequently described.
Background:
The Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events is an item library designed for eliciting patient-reported adverse events in oncology. For each ...adverse event, up to three individual items are scored for frequency, severity, and interference with daily activities. To align the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events with other standardized tools for adverse event assessment including the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, an algorithm for mapping individual items for any given adverse event to a single composite numerical grade was developed and tested.
Methods:
A five-step process was used: (1) All 179 possible Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events score combinations were presented to 20 clinical investigators to subjectively map combinations to single numerical grades ranging from 0 to 3. (2) Combinations with <75% agreement were presented to investigator committees at a National Clinical Trials Network cooperative group meeting to gain majority consensus via anonymous voting. (3) The resulting algorithm was refined via graphical and tabular approaches to assure directional consistency. (4) Validity, reliability, and sensitivity were assessed in a national study dataset. (5) Accuracy for delineating adverse events between study arms was measured in two Phase III clinical trials (NCT02066181 and NCT01522443).
Results:
In Step 1, 12/179 score combinations had <75% initial agreement. In Step 2, majority consensus was reached for all combinations. In Step 3, five grades were adjusted to assure directional consistency. In Steps 4 and 5, composite grades performed well and comparably to individual item scores on validity, reliability, sensitivity, and between-arm delineation.
Conclusion:
A composite grading algorithm has been developed and yields single numerical grades for adverse events assessed via the Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, and can be useful in analyses and reporting.
Immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) are often seen during immune‐checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment of various malignancies. Endocrine irAEs including thyroid dysfunctions are the most common ...irAEs, but their biomarkers remain unclear. In order to identify individuals who are susceptible to thyroid irAE for earlier diagnosis and appropriate follow‐up, the current study is aimed to investigate biomarkers of thyroid irAE. Herein, patients with advanced malignant diseases who received ICIs treatment were prospectively studied. Clinical and laboratory examination, thyroid function, and autoantibodies were evaluated at baseline, and every 4 wk after first treatment with ICIs. Cytokines/chemokines were measured at baseline and at 4 wk. In vivo effects of ICIs on experimental autoimmune thyroiditis were evaluated. Twenty‐six patients with malignant diseases who received ICIs treatment were enrolled in the study. Patients were divided into two groups: those who developed thyroid irAE, and those without irAEs. Comparing the two groups, early increase (≤4 wk) in serum thyroglobulin (Tg) levels and thyroid autoantibodies was seen in thyroid irAE (P < .05). Notably, higher levels of serum IL‐1β, IL‐2, and GM‐CSF at baseline, and early decrease of IL‐8, G‐CSF, and MCP‐1 were significantly associated in the development of thyroid irAE (P < .05). In vivo effects of anti‐PD‐1 antibody on deterioration of mice experimental thyroiditis were seen. In conclusion, early change in Tg, thyroid autoimmunity, and cytokine levels might indicate development of thyroid irAE. Pre‐existing thyroid autoimmunity might be involved with the development of thyroid irAE. Potential application of these factors as surrogate biomarkers for tumor therapy was indicated.
In 2020, prior to COVID-19 vaccine rollout, the Brighton Collaboration created a priority list, endorsed by the World Health Organization, of potential adverse events relevant to COVID-19 vaccines. ...We adapted the Brighton Collaboration list to evaluate serious adverse events of special interest observed in mRNA COVID-19 vaccine trials.
Secondary analysis of serious adverse events reported in the placebo-controlled, phase III randomized clinical trials of Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines in adults (NCT04368728 and NCT04470427), focusing analysis on Brighton Collaboration adverse events of special interest.
Pfizer and Moderna mRNA COVID-19 vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 10.1 and 15.1 per 10,000 vaccinated over placebo baselines of 17.6 and 42.2 (95 % CI −0.4 to 20.6 and −3.6 to 33.8), respectively. Combined, the mRNA vaccines were associated with an excess risk of serious adverse events of special interest of 12.5 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 2.1 to 22.9); risk ratio 1.43 (95 % CI 1.07 to 1.92). The Pfizer trial exhibited a 36 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group; risk difference 18.0 per 10,000 vaccinated (95 % CI 1.2 to 34.9); risk ratio 1.36 (95 % CI 1.02 to 1.83). The Moderna trial exhibited a 6 % higher risk of serious adverse events in the vaccine group: risk difference 7.1 per 10,000 (95 % CI –23.2 to 37.4); risk ratio 1.06 (95 % CI 0.84 to 1.33). Combined, there was a 16 % higher risk of serious adverse events in mRNA vaccine recipients: risk difference 13.2 (95 % CI −3.2 to 29.6); risk ratio 1.16 (95 % CI 0.97 to 1.39).
The excess risk of serious adverse events found in our study points to the need for formal harm-benefit analyses, particularly those that are stratified according to risk of serious COVID-19 outcomes. These analyses will require public release of participant level datasets.
Background
Despite unprecedented efficacy across multiple tumor types, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy is associated with a unique and wide spectrum of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), ...including neurologic events ranging from mild headache to potentially life‐threatening encephalitis. Here, we summarize neurologic irAEs associated with nivolumab and ipilimumab melanoma treatment, present cases of treatment‐related encephalitis, and provide practical guidance on diagnosis and management.
Methods
We searched a Global Pharmacovigilance and Epidemiology database for neurologic irAEs reported over an 8‐year period in patients with advanced melanoma receiving nivolumab with or without ipilimumab from 12 studies sponsored by Bristol‐Myers Squibb. Serious neurologic irAEs were reviewed, and relationship to nivolumab or ipilimumab was assigned.
Results
In our search of 3,763 patients, 35 patients (0.93%) presented with 43 serious neurologic irAEs, including neuropathy (n = 22), noninfective meningitis (n = 5), encephalitis (n = 6), neuromuscular disorders (n = 3), and nonspecific adverse events (n = 7). Study drug was discontinued (n = 20), interrupted (n = 8), or unchanged (n = 7). Most neurologic irAEs resolved (26/35 patients; 75%). Overall, median time to onset was 45 days (range 1–170) and to resolution was 32 days (2–809+). Median time to onset of encephalitis was 55.5 days (range 18–297); four cases resolved and one was fatal.
Conclusion
Both oncologists and neurologists need to be aware of signs and symptoms of serious but uncommon neurologic irAEs associated with checkpoint inhibitors. Prompt diagnosis and management using an established algorithm are critical to minimize serious complications from these neurologic irAEs.
Implications for Practice
With increasing use of checkpoint inhibitors in cancer, practicing oncologists need to be aware of the potential risk of neurologic immune‐related adverse events and be able to provide prompt treatment of this uncommon, but potentially serious, class of adverse events. We summarize neurologic adverse events related to nivolumab alone or in combination with ipilimumab in patients with advanced melanoma from 12 studies and examine in depth 6 cases of encephalitis. We also provide input and guidance on the existing neurologic adverse events management algorithm for nivolumab and ipilimumab.
Melanoma is a particularly immunogenic cancer, and immune checkpoint inhibitors have been extensively studied in this tumor type. This review focuses on the incidence of serious neurologic immune‐related adverse events, specifically encephalitis, in patients with advanced melanoma treated with nivolumab alone or in sequence or combination with ipilimumab. Practical guidance is provided for the diagnosis and management of treatment‐related encephalitis associated with nivolumab and ipilimumab.
•It was the most comprehensive study to analyze irAEs based on FAERS.•Lung toxicities and endocrine toxicities generated signals in all ICI regimens.•Pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease were ...the most frequently reported irAEs.
Immune-related adverse events were reported in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). However, with the increasing number of immune-related adverse events (irAEs), the differences of each immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen had not been fully assessed.
Disproportionality analysis was used in data mining of the suspected adverse events after ICIs administration based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from January 2004 to December 2019. The onset time and fatality proportion of ICI-associated irAEs were further evaluated.
A total of 32,441 reports of ICI-associated irAEs were gathered. This study showed that all ICI regimens generated lung toxicity and endocrine toxicity signals. Colitis, pneumonitis and interstitial lung disease were the most common ICI-associated irAEs. Five regimens including durvalumab monotherapy, ipilimumab monotherapy, ipilimumab plus nivolumab, ipilimumab plus pembrolizumab, durvalumab plus tremelimumab were associated with irAEs. Anti-PD-1 agents generated more signals of ocular toxicities than anti-PD-L1 agents, while anti-PD-L1 agents reported more signals of hematologic toxicities. Anti-CTLA-4 agents showed more signals of gastrointestinal toxicities compared with anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 agents. The highest fatality proportion of lung toxicities with durvalumab monotherapy, hematological toxicities with avelumab monotherapy, renal and skin toxicities with cemiplimab monotherapy were found.
Our results demonstrated that each ICI regimen had different characteristics of irAEs. Pembrolizumab had the highest fatality proportion. Ipilimumab plus pembrolizumab had the shortest median time to onset irAEs. Further studies were expected to assess whether there were clinically relevant differences exist among ICIs.
Background
Immune‐checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are now standard of care for advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, many patients experience immune‐related adverse events (irAEs), ...which are usually mild and reversible, but they require timely management and may be life threatening. No predictive markers of irAEs are available.
Materials and Methods
The neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were evaluated in patients with NSCLC consecutively treated with ICIs. Prespecified cutoff values of NLR and PLR were used and related to outcome and onset of irAEs. A control group of patients with advanced NSCLC not receiving ICIs was included.
Results
The study included 184 patients: 26 (14.1%) received pembrolizumab upfront, and 142 (77%) received ICIs (pembrolizumab, nivolumab or atezolizumab) after one or more lines of chemotherapy. The median number of ICIs cycles was six (range, 1–61). The median progression‐free survival and overall survival were 4.8 (95% CI, 3.4–6.3) and 20.6 (95% CI, 14.7–26.5) months, respectively. Sixty patients (32.6%) developed irAEs, mainly grade 1–2 (65.0%), causing ICI interruption in 46 cases (25.0%). Low NLR and low PLR at baseline were significantly associated with the development of irAEs (odds ratio OR, 2.2; p = .018 and OR, 2.8; p = .003, respectively). Multivariate analyses confirmed PLR as independent predictive marker of irAEs (OR, 2.3; p = .020).
Conclusion
NLR and PLR may predict the appearance of irAEs in non‐oncogene‐addicted aNSCLC, although this conclusion warrants prospective validation.
Implications for Practice
This study was designed to investigate the role of blood biomarkers in predicting the occurrence of immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) in patients with advanced non‐small cell lung cancer receiving immunotherapy. The results of the study suggest a potential predictive role of neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio and platelet‐to‐lymphocyte ratio as markers for irAE development in this category of patients. These data provide rationale for an easy and feasible application to be validated in clinical practice.
摘要
背景。免疫检查点抑制剂 (ICI) 药物目前是治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌 (NSCLC) 的标准药物。不幸的是，许多患者会出现免疫相关不良事件 (irAE)，虽然此类事件通常并不严重而且可逆，但需要及时治疗而且可能会危及生命。目前还没有 irAE 的预测标志物。
材料和方法。评估连续接受 ICI 治疗的 NSCLC 患者的中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比 (NLR) 和血小板淋巴细胞比 (PLR)。使用预先指定的 NLR 和 PLR 临界值，该值与 irAE 结局和发病相关。对照组选择未接受 ICI 治疗的晚期 NSCLC 患者。
结果。研究包括 184 名患者:26 例 (14.1%) 预先接受帕博利珠单抗 (Pembrolizumab) 治疗，142 例 (77%) 在经过一线或多线化疗之后接受 ICI(帕博利珠单抗、纳武单抗或阿特朱单抗)治疗。中位ICI 周期为 6(范围:1‐61)。中位无进展生存期和总生存期分别为 4.8 个月(95% CI, 3.4‐6.3) 和 20.6 个月 (95% CI, 14.7‐26.5)。60 例 (32.6%) 患者发生 irAE，以 1‐2 级为主 (65.0%)，其中 46 例 (25.0%) 中断 ICI 治疗。基线 NLR 低和 PLR 低与 irAE 的发生显著相关 分别为:比值比 (OR)， 2.2；p = 0.018, OR, 2.8; p = 0.003。多变量分析证实 PLR 是 irAE 的独立预测标志物 (OR, 2.3; p = 0.020)。
结论。NLR 和 PLR 可能预测非嗜癌性 aNSCLC 中是否会出现 irAE，但这一结论仍需接受前瞻性验证。
实践意义:本研究旨在探讨血液生物标志物在预测晚期非小细胞肺癌患者免疫相关不良事件 (irAE) 发生中的作用。研究结果表明，中性粒细胞淋巴细胞比和血小板淋巴细胞比是预测此类患者是否发生 irAE 的潜在预测标志物。这些数据为简单可行的应用提供了理论依据，有待临床实践验证。
Predictive markers for immune‐related adverse events (irAEs) are not available. This article evaluates the association of peripheral blood markers with the onset of irAEs in patients with non‐oncogene addicted advanced non‐small cell lung cancer treated with immune‐checkpoint inhibitors.
PDF
