Customary land administration in West Sumatra has been carried out for a long time. However, many issues have arisen due to the administration of communal land needing to recognise communal rights to ...land ownership optimally. As mandated in the Basic Agrarian Law, the government is carrying out an administration transformation carried out by the Ministry of ATR/BPN starting in 2021, the customary land administration scheme is carried out with the customary land protection scheme which is granted through the granting of Land Management Rights (HPL) to customary authorities. The transformation of customary land administration is carried out with a Collaborative Governance perspective to optimize the program’s success. This study uses descriptive research methods through a qualitative approach with literature studies to analyze the transformation of customary land administration in the concept of collaborative governance in West Sumatra. Research results show that collaboration and partnership in the administration of communal land have represented essential elements in the principle of Collaborative Governance. Research also shows the failure to achieve consensus on the coordination and collaboration process, so the Pilot Project, which was planned in 3 districts, was successfully implemented in 2 districts, namely Tanah Datar District and Lima Puluh Kota District.
The reliance solely on the government or enterprises to promote climate governance is contingent upon the vested interests of economic entities and the regulatory bodies' efficiency in governance. ...Can the model of government-enterprise green collaborative governance evolve into a long-term mechanism for addressing the climate crisis and achieving the goals of sustainable development? By crawling data on public-private partnerships (PPP), employing ChatGPT to identify green PPP projects, and building a generalized difference-in-differences framework based on the Guidance on Building a Green Financial System issued in 2016, this present study investigates whether the involvement of private capital in government-led environmental and climate governance can effectively facilitate government-enterprise green collaborative governance, thereby mitigating urban carbon emissions. The study finds government-enterprise green collaborative governance can significantly reduce urban carbon emissions. The conclusion remains valid even after several rounds of robustness tests, including removing the influence of pertinent climate policies, adjusting the settings of independent and dependent variables, and removing self-selection issues. Heterogeneity tests show, on the first hand, the carbon emission reduction effect of government-enterprise green collaborative governance differs due to the differences in the characteristics of green PPP(Pubic-private partnership) projects such as project return mechanism, project investment volume, and project cooperation term; on the other hand, the carbon emission reduction effect also shows heterogeneity with various urban characteristics such as geographical location, city type and city size. Mechanism tests indicate government-enterprise green collaborative governance affects urban carbon emissions mainly through structural effects, technological effects and co-investment effects. This paper offers a valuable framework for effectively promoting environmental and climate co-governance between governmental bodies and enterprises, while enhancing the market's role in resource benefit allocation within climate governance to mitigate the risks associated with climate change.
•This paper first verifies the effectiveness of the green PPP model in carbon emission control.•The use of ChatGPT to identify green PPP projects, which provides an innovative method for data processing.•The carbon reduction effect varies with the characteristics of green PPP projects and cities.•This paper offers a valuable framework for effectively promoting climate co-governance between governmental and enterprises.
Experiments in collaborative governance over the last several decades have transformed the way the public's business is getting done. Despite growing interest, empirical research on the performance ...of cross-boundary collaboration continues to be limited by conceptual and methodological challenges. This article extends previous research to develop a performance matrix for assessing the productivity of collaborative governance regimes (CGRs). Three performance levels (actions, outcomes, and adaptation) are addressed at three units of analysis (participant organizations, the CGR itself, and target goals), creating a performance matrix of nine critical dimensions of CGR productivity. This performance matrix is illustrated with a case study of a CGR operating on the U.S.-Mexico border.
This paper introduces the reader to a special issue focused on Collaborative Governance implementation. The purpose of this symposium is to advance our understanding of the cross-cutting and complex ...issues of collaborative governance implementation, which include: (a) supporting the collaborative process through innovative models and methods for enhancing a shared understanding of community problems and outcomes, (b) fostering the interplay between service policy and service delivery, and (c) combining a public service view with an institutional and interinstitutional view.
Munculnya Covid-19 pada awal Mei 2020 di Kabupaten Lombok Utara (KLU) yang menyebar di setiap kecamatan hingga pada Oktober 2020 telah menginfeksi 114 orang dengan jumlah korban meninggal 5 orang. ...namun Minimnya kemampuan pemerintah dalam penyelesaian pandemi covid-19 sehingga dalam hal ini perlunya keterlibatan berbagai pihak yang berkolaborasi dalam menyelesaikan masalah pandemi dalam hal ini pemerintah perlu melibatkan elemen masyarakat sipil, tokoh masyarakat, LSM, Perguruan tinggi/ akademisi dan stakeholders lainnya dalam merumuskan, merencanakan, dan melaksanakan suatu kebijakan terkait penanggulangan Covid-19 di Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Berdasarkan uraian diatas, dapat ditarik sebuah rumusan masalah yakni Analisis Urgensi Penerapan Collaborative Governance dalam Penanggulangan Covid-19 -19 di Kabupaten Lombok Utara. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif. Dengan menggunakan teknik wawancara secara mendalam dengan pemerintah KLU yang menangani masalah Covid-19. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pemerintah Kabupaten Lombok Utara telah menerapkan Collaborative Governance dengan melibatkan tokoh masyarakat dan melibatkan beberapa Lembaga Swadaya Masyarakat secara maksimal dalam penanggulangan covid-19. Serta, tetap berkolaborasi dengan berikap kooperatif terhadap NGO yang berada diluar organisasi satgas yang dibentuk.
Academic attention to smart cities and their governance is growing rapidly, but the fragmentation in approaches makes for a confusing debate. This article brings some structure to the debate by ...analyzing a corpus of 51 publications and mapping their variation. The analysis shows that publications differ in their emphasis on (1) smart technology, smart people or smart collaboration as the defining features of smart cities, (2) a transformative or incremental perspective on changes in urban governance, (3) better outcomes or a more open process as the legitimacy claim for smart city governance. We argue for a comprehensive perspective: smart city governance is about crafting new forms of human collaboration through the use of ICTs to obtain better outcomes and more open governance processes. Research into smart city governance could benefit from previous studies into success and failure factors for e-government and build upon sophisticated theories of socio-technical change. This article highlights that smart city governance is not a technological issue: we should study smart city governance as a complex process of institutional change and acknowledge the political nature of appealing visions of socio-technical governance.
Points for practitioners
The study provides practitioners with an in-depth understanding of current debates about smart city governance. The article highlights that governing a smart city is about crafting new forms of human collaboration through the use of information and communication technologies. City managers should realize that technology by itself will not make a city smarter: building a smart city requires a political understanding of technology, a process approach to manage the emerging smart city and a focus on both economic gains and other public values.
This research aimed to understand The Collaborative Governance in Digital Infrastructure Development in Indonesia and its interesting implication due at the ontological level and sociological level ...based on public policy perspective. The problem was analyzed using a qualitative study. Data were collected through observation and documentation. Data were analyzed using interactive steps, such as data reduction, data display, and data verification, supported by triangulation. The results indicated that Digital Infrastructure Development in Indonesia and its implementation are needed for providing information to stakeholders. This result provided inputs for making better regulation and policy for state agencies as public officials and practitioners.
The sustainable management of complex social-ecological systems (SES) typically requires coordination and collaboration between various groups of stakeholders. Yet, research on collaborative ...stakeholder networks and their linkages with sustainable mangrove management strategies is lacking in Sri Lanka. This study presents a social network analysis (SNA) of mangrove management stakeholders and their perceptions of both existing and preferred collaborative relationships (or ties) between stakeholder groups, in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka. It further illustrates how SNA can be used to identify stakeholder collaboration and their potential role(s) in mangrove management. The perspectives of all key stakeholders have an impact on how mangroves need to be managed. Therefore, it is crucial to identify and meet with all key stakeholders in the early stages of management processes to understand their needs and constraints. Our findings indicate that the government departments mandated to conserve mangroves are not only formally appointed key stakeholders but are also perceived as central by others. Communication barriers, lack of awareness regarding the importance of mangroves, and shortages in staff and resources for conservation were major constraints to the existing mangrove management network. We highlight the potential of other stakeholders (i.e., non-mandated government stakeholders, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), and private organizations) in improving and influencing the social network in order to increase the diffusion of information. Despite existing resource extraction activities, private organizations were less represented in the mangrove management network of our study. After considering stakeholders’ expectations and requirements, we suggest the inclusion of a bridging organization such as an “Environment Network Unit” or the establishment of bridging entities in the universities and research institutes. We also recommend certain government organizations (i.e., Central Environmental Authority) to take up the role of bridging. This may help to facilitate the incorporation of relatively marginalized stakeholders in an effort to foster sustainable mangrove management in the Northern Province of Sri Lanka and beyond.
This paper contributes to the study of collaborative governance (CG) - systems where autonomous actors work together around shared objectives using pooled resources to address a common goal. Among ...CG's claimed benefits are boosting actor capacities for transformative action and increasing their resilience to complex multi-scaled challenges such as hazards and sudden catastrophic events. We engage with collaborative governance through a case study of changing public policy and institutional structures that govern hazards in Nepal. Following the shocking event of the 2015 Gorkha earthquake, Nepal's approach to disaster risk reduction (DRR) has been reshaped by federalisation and institutional reforms that aim to embed a governing system based on greater collaboration. We argue this amounts to a state transition to a collaborative governance regime (CGR) for DRR. Using primary qualitative data derived from 17 semi-structured interviews at national, provincial, and local scales, we identify state-sponsored scalar narratives around 1) actor capacities and tendencies in DRR; 2) knowledge production on DRR and its dissemination; and 3) formal and informal institutional DRR roles and responsibilities. We show how these narratives are being used as anchor points for a new CG approach to national DRR strategy. However, our analysis shows these narratives risk excluding local participation in DRR by marginalising grassroots politics to emphasise top-down state-led goals. In turn, this leads us to question the viability of the emerging governance regime as a truly collaborative project embedding principles of sustainability and inclusivity. We conclude that if these state scalar narratives continue to shape national policy, they will impede the potential for transformative collaborative action for DRR in Nepal.
•Looks at the use of the discourse of collaborative governance.•Case study of institutional changes to Nepali DRR after the 2015 earthquake.•Identifies state scalar narratives for collaborative governance regime.•Finds that collaborative governance regime is not truly collaborative.•Current trajectory risks ignoring local level politics and needs.
ABSTRACTConsidering its contribution to solving societal issues, social innovation (SI) has become critical to driving community development. This paper exposes the role of SI in community ...development processes at a grassroots level, drawing on volunteers’ experience in collaborative stunting intervention in Sukabumi Regency, a rural area in Indonesia. This study employs a qualitative approach, incorporating data collection methods such as in-person interviews, observation, and document analysis. Findings reveal that human development volunteers, initially appointed by the state, have successfully established a forum that essentially functions as an informal self-organizing group. Self-organizing volunteers might be categorized as SI because they offer a new way of interacting with other actors in collaborative governance, paying attention to community problems and aiming to create community changes. Through the forum, cadres can participate not only as individuals but also that through collective actions. While their meaningful activities are visible, cadres face barriers to changing power relations in collaborative governance and making social changes. The findings contribute to the literature by showcasing an understanding of how self-organizing volunteers function as a social innovation in collaborative processes.