The paper aims to review the history of dialectology at Vilnius University since the establishment of the Department of the Lithuanian Language in 1940. To achieve this, we have set the following ...objectives: 1) to present the teaching of dialectology, 2) to review the dialect material collection, and 3) to examine existing research. Descriptive, analytical, and evaluative methods are applied in the study. The beginning of dialectological research is associated with the name of Antanas Salys. The works of Aleksas Girdenis and Zigmas Zinkevičius are also discussed in the paper, as well as the teaching of the dialectology subject, methods of collecting dialectological material and directions of dialectological research. The paper distinguishes the paradigms of traditional, structural, and new dialectology dialectology, and examines their methodological similarities and differences. The most important conclusions and summaries of the paper are fundamentally related to dialectological paradigms: in more than eighty years since the first dialectology subject taught at Vilnius University, the understanding of dialectology has changed. The stage of traditional dialectology at the University was extremely important, as it produced the most fundamental works that are still used today. The structural dialectology paradigm and Prof. Girdenis Dialectology School that trained a large group of productively working Lithuanian dialectologists has flourished over the years. Currently, the new paradigm of dialectology is making its way, offering new theoretical and methodological approaches to the study of dialects.
Šio straipsnio tyrimo objektas yra dialektologija Vilniaus universitete. Straipsnio tikslas – apžvelgti dialektologijos istoriją nuo Lietuvių kalbos katedros įkūrimo universitete 1940 m. rugsėjo 11 d. iki šių dienų. Tikslui pasiekti išsikelti tokie uždaviniai: išnagrinėti šios lingvistinės disciplinos svarbiausius aspektus: 1) dialektologijos dėstymą, 2) tarmių medžiagos kaupimą, 3) tarmių mokslinius tyrimus. Straipsnyje taikomi deskriptyvinis, analitinis ir vertinamasis metodai. Dialektologinių tyrimų pradžia siejama su Antano Salio vardu. Dėmesys skiriamas ir Alekso Girdenio ir Zigmo Zinkevičiaus darbams aptarti, apžvelgiamas dialektologijos kurso dėstymas, dialektologinės medžiagos kaupimo būdai ir dialektologinių tyrimų kryptys. Išskiriamos ir nagrinėjamos tradicinės, struktūrinės ir naujosios dialektologijos paradigmos, jų metodologiniai panašumai ir skirtumai. Su dialektologinėmis paradigmomis iš esmės susijusios svarbiausios straipsnio išvados ir apibendrinimai: per daugiau kaip aštuoniasdešimt metų – nuo pirmojo dialektologijos kurso iki dabartinio – Vilniaus universitete supratimas apie kalbamąjį mokslą kito. Tradicinės dialektologijos etapas Universitete buvo itin svarbus – juo pasirodė daugiausiai fundamentinių darbų, kuriais remiamasi dar ir šiandien. Vėliau suklestėjo struktūrinės dialektologijos paradigma ir prof. A. Girdenio dialektologijos mokykla, parengusi didelį būrį produktyviai dirbančių lietuvių dialektologų. Šiuo metu kelią skinasi naujosios dialektologijos paradigma, siūlanti naujų teorinių ir metodologinių prieigų tarmių tyrimams.
Taal & Tongval zonder dialecten? De Vogelaer, Gunther; De Wulf, Chris
Taal en tongval,
01/2021, Letnik:
72, Številka:
1
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
This special issue contains a selection of the contributions to the 2018 colloquium "Dialectologie zonder dialecten", which also celebrated the 70th anniversary of Taal & Tongval.
Drawing on the resources created by the Institute of Historical Dialectology at the University of Edinburgh this volume illustrates how traditional methods of historical dialectology can benefit from ...new methods of data-collection to test out theoretical and empirical claims.
In the last three decades, digitization has greatly changed both the databases and the way in which dialectological studies of Spanish are carried out. Transferring the information from the printed ...space to the virtual space is a fundamental achievement, although it does not exhaust at all the possibilities of digital dialectology. Numerous research areas and proposals are currently derived not only from data processing, but also from the conception of the issues raised and their analysis methodologies.
‘What is the difference between a language and a dialect?’ is one of the questions most frequently asked of linguists. A notorious and oft-repeated answer is ‘A language is a dialect with an army and ...navy’, wrongly attributed to Max Weinreich. Linguists have mostly used this witticism as a handy way to end the discussion and dismiss the distinction between language and dialect as a political question irrelevant to their discipline. This book does not attempt to answer this seemingly unsolvable puzzle either but aims to shed light on a simple fact usually overlooked by linguists and laypeople alike: the conceptual pair is not a timeless given but has a history, and a much shorter one than one might assume. It starts not in Greek antiquity, as the origin of the word dialect may suggest, but in the sixteenth century. Taking the Weinreich witticism as its starting point, this book guides the reader on the remarkable journey which the conceptual pair has made. It begins with the prehistory of the language/dialect distinction in antiquity and the Middle Ages. The core of the book surveys the emergence, establishment, and elaboration of the conceptual pair during the early modern period, from the Renaissance to the Enlightenment, when linguistic diversity first became an object of intense study. Finally, the much-contested and ambiguous fate of the language / dialect distinction in modern linguistics is outlined, with special reference to the persistence of earlier ideas and the rise to prominence of the political interpretation crystallized in the Weinreich quip.
Ce travail s'appuyant sur le DNFR de Iorgu Iordan, attire encore une fois l'attention sur la relation étroite entre anthroponymie et dialectologie. Pour ce faire, l'auteur a sélecté quelques ...anthroponymes du dictionnaire déjà mentionné, susceptibles d'être réinterprétés conformément aux données offertes par des matériaux dialectaux récents.