Fiducijarno osiguranje tražbine i, s njim u vezi, fiducijarno vlasništvo, uvedeno je u hrvatski pravni sustav donošenjem Zakona o vlasništvu i drugim stvarnim pravima 1996. godine. Ubrzo potom, ...institut je reguliran i odredbama Ovršnog zakona koji ga u odnosu na Zakon o vlasništvu i drugim stvarnim pravima ureðuje kao lex specialis. Ono što je kod fiducije i fiducijarnog vlasništva u hrvatskom zakonodavstvu osobito zanimljivo i što je u središtu znanstvenog interesa autorica u ovom radu, nepomirljive su koncepcijske razlike u regulaciji instituta koje postoje meðu navedenim zakonima. Nakon predstavljanja temeljnih razlika u ureðenjima izmeðu Zakona o vlasništvu i drugim stvarnim pravima i Ovršnog zakona istražit će se i neka komparativna rješenja - ona u državama bivše SFRJ i u SR Njemačkoj. Na temelju tako provedenog istraživanja autorice postavljaju pitanje trebaju li se ovršnopravna rješenja ugledati na stvarnopravna, odnosno kojem ureðenju treba dati prednost i bi li se time pridonijelo ravnopravnosti stranaka u odnosu fiducijarnog osiguranja, odnosno ostvarenju načela pravičnosti.
Fiducia and, in relation with it, fiduciary ownership, was introduced into the Croatian legal system with the adoption of the Act on Ownership and Other Real Rights in 1996. Soon after, the institute ...was also introduced in the Enforcement Act., which regulates the institute as lex specialis. What is particularly interesting about fiducia and fiduciary ownership in Croatian legislation, and what is at the center of the author’s scientific interest in this paper, are the irreconcilable conceptual differences in the regulation of the institute between the Act on Ownership and Other Real Rights and the Enforcement Act. After presenting the fundamental differences between regulations in the Act on Ownership and Other Real Rights and Enforcement Act, some comparative solutions shall be presented – those in the former SFRJ states and in the Federal Republic of Germany. Based on the research carried out in this way, the authors ask the question whether legal solutions in the Enforcement Act should be modeled on those in the Act on Ownership and Other Real Rights, which arrangement should be given priority, and whether this would contribute to the equality of parties in the fiduciary insurance relationship, i.e. the realization of the principle of fairness.
