Defoliation level and site type are thought to influence tree response during spruce budworm (Choristoneura fumiferana (Clemens)) outbreaks. We determined the effects of four manual defoliation ...treatments (0%, 50%, 100%, and 100% + bud removal of current foliage) for 3 years on foliage production of balsam fir (Abies balsamea (L.) Mill.), black spruce (Picea mariana (Mill.) Britton, Sterns & Poggenb.), and white spruce (Picea glauca (Moench) Voss) trees on four site-quality classes. After 3 years of defoliation and 2 years of recovery, foliage biomass was reduced by 34%–98%. During defoliation, the number of shoots generally increased and shoot length of spruce generally decreased, especially on rich sites. During recovery, the number of shoots increased substantially, shoot length decreased, and bud destruction reduced the number of shoots by about 50% compared with that of trees that received the 100% defoliation treatment. Defoliation did not substantially affect needle length. Trees on rich sites had two- to fourfold greater foliage production than trees on poor sites. Effects of site and defoliation differed among species, but site quality, especially nutrition, played an important role in production of shoots and needles and the tree’s ability to withstand defoliation. Black spruce had more limited ability to recover foliage biomass, only producing more shoots, whereas balsam fir and white spruce had stronger ability to recover needle and shoot length, respectively.
Celotno besedilo
Dostopno za:
BF, DOBA, IZUM, KILJ, NUK, PILJ, PNG, SAZU, SIK, UILJ, UKNU, UL, UM, UPUK
Delayed inducible resistance (DIR) is triggered by artificial or herbivore-caused foliar damage and is manifested as decreased performance of herbivore generation(s) feeding on the trees subsequent ...to the generation during which the damage took place. DIR is associated with increase in concentrations of foliage phenolics and decrease in nitrogen. The growth-differentiation balance hypothesis, and the carbon-nutrient balance (CNB) hypothesis contained in it, claim that DIR is caused by nutritional stress after defoliation of trees growing on nutrient-poor soils. In these environments, nutrient uptake limits plant growth more strongly than does photosynthesis; that is, carbon-based secondary metabolites (e.g., phenolics) are prone to accumulate. According to the CNB hypothesis, an excess of limiting nutrient(s) or reduced photosynthetic rate should lead to elimination of DIR. We tested this using same-aged Betula pubescens ssp. tortuosa trees of five open-pollinated families growing in a common arboretum in northernmost Finland. In addition to unmanipulated control trees, we had three nutritional treatments during three successive growth seasons: N-fertilization, PK-fertilization adding all nutrients except N, and shading to decrease carbon assimilation. Half of the trees in each treatment were artificially defoliated (50% leaf area) in the second study year, one year before the growth trial with geometrid (Epirrita autumnata) larvae. Tree growth measurements showed that N is the growth-limiting nutrient in our study area. N-fertilization and shading of the trees affected foliage chemistry generally as proposed by the CNB hypothesis. For example, they reduced foliar concentrations of total phenolics and condensed tannins. The birch families differed significantly in foliage chemistry, suggesting genetic differences, but the differences were not associated with fertilizations, shading, or defoliation of the trees. Contrary to fertilizing-shade treatments, changes in leaf chemistry and E. autumnata performance caused by defoliation were not consistent with the CNB hypothesis. For example, defoliation caused significant DIR irrespective of N-fertilization or shading. There were no significant differences among the birch families in performance of the moth larvae or in effects of fertilization, shade, or defoliation on larval performance. These responses to defoliation contrast with those of some other studies, especially those on the Betula resinifera-Rheumaptera hastata system in Alaska, which provide clear support for the CNB as an explanation of DIR. We find methodological differences to be an unlikely explanation for the different results but are unable to propose any single mechanism that will explain the diverse plant responses.
Siebold's beech (Fagus crenata) was manually defoliated for two successive years. The beech caterpillar (Quadricalcarifera punctatella) was used in a bioassay to determine insect performance. ...Survival and body size were low on foliage from defoliated trees. Reduced foliar nitrogen and increased tannin content were probably the main causes of the low insect performance. Leaves were less tough on defoliated trees than in controls. Two sucessive years of manual defoliation caused stronger induced resistance than one year defoliation. The quanlity, as well as the quality of the foliage, decreased the year following manual defoliation; total weight of leaves on a tree was less than one half of that before treatment. Severe defoliation may cause a decrease of leaves the following year and starvation may limit populations. Delayed induced resistance of beech trees is proposed as a possible cause of the cyclical population dynamics of Q. punctatella. The delayed induced response also affected folivorous insects other than Q. punctatella.
