INTRODUCTIONPercutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) is an invasive procedure used for the assessment of liver diseases. The patient’s recovery position after the PLB differs among hospitals and departments. ...This study aims to evaluate adverse events and patient acceptability according to the recovery position adopted after the PLB.
PATIENTS AND METHODSFrom September 2014 to March 2017, patients submitted to PLB were randomly assigned to a recovery position armright-side position (RRP), dorsal position (DRP), or combined position. A validated numerical rating scale was used to evaluate the level of pain and the overall acceptability of the PLB experience.
RESULTSNinety (27 patients in RRP, 33 in DRP and 30 in combined position arm) patients were included in the study. There were no differences between the three groups regarding demographic and clinical parameters, except for the number of previous biopsies – higher in the combined group (P=0.03). No major adverse events occurred. Minor complications described were pain (36.7% of patients), vasovagal reaction (2.2%) and nauseas/vomit (3.3%). Pain level and pain duration did not differ significantly between groups. Pain occurred more often in women (P=0.04) and younger patients (P=0.02). The number of passages, operator and previous biopsy did not influence the occurrence of pain. The RRP group considered the procedure less acceptable than the DRP group (P=0.001) or the combined group (P=0.002). There were no differences between the last two arms.
CONCLUSIONAlthough RRP is the most frequently used position, it appears to be less acceptable without any protective role in terms of adverse events.
Singapore First Aid Guidelines 2021 Zarisfi, Faraz; Pek, Jen Heng; Oh, Janice Hui Hong ...
Singapore medical journal,
08/2021, Letnik:
62, Številka:
8
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
The Singapore Resuscitation and First Aid Council is updating the guidelines for first aid based on the latest evidence-based review from the International First Aid Taskforce Consensus on Science ...with Treatment Recommendations published in 2020. This is part of the regular updating of standards of care and training for first aid. This article presents some of the updated evidence-based approaches to first aid treatments in common emergencies such as asthma, chronic bronchitis, anaphylaxis, shock, unresponsiveness, seizure, heat disorders, ingested poisons, bleeding, head and spinal injury, bites and dental injuries. These updated treatments will be incorporated into the Standard and Child First Aid course syllabus in Singapore.
Erste Hilfe Zideman, David A.; Singletary, Eunice M.; Borra, Vere ...
Notfall & Rettungsmedizin,
06/2021, Letnik:
24, Številka:
4
Journal Article
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
Zusammenfassung
Diese Erste-Hilfe-Leitlinien beruhen auf dem internationalen, wissenschaftlichen Konsens 2020 zur kardiopulmonalen Wiederbelebung mit Behandlungsempfehlungen und wurden vom European ...Resuscitation Council erstellt. Die Themen umfassen das Erste-Hilfe-Management im Bereich Notfallmedizin und Traumata. Im Themenbereich medizinische Notfälle werden folgende Inhalte behandelt: Seitenlagerung, optimale Lagerung eines Betroffenen im Kreislaufschock, Gabe von Bronchodilatatoren bei Asthma, Erkennung eines Schlaganfalls, frühe Gabe von Acetylsalicylsäure bei Brustschmerzen, Zweitgabe von Adrenalin bei Anaphylaxie, Behandlung einer Unterzuckerung/Hypoglykämie, orale Gabe von Rehydrierungslösungen zur Behandlung eines erschöpfungsbedingten Flüssigkeitsmangels, Behandlung eines Hitzschlags durch Kühlung, Sauerstoffgabe bei akutem Schlaganfall und Benommenheit. Im Themenbereich Trauma werden folgende Themen behandelt: Stillung lebensbedrohlicher Blutungen, Behandlung offener Brustkorbverletzungen, Stabilisierung und Immobilisation der Halswirbelsäule, Erkennung von Gehirnerschütterungen, Kühlung von Verbrennungen, Zahnverlust, Kompressionsverband bei geschlossenen Gelenkverletzungen an Extremitäten, Reponierung von Frakturen mit Fehlstellung sowie Augenverletzungen durch chemische Stoffe.
Summary
Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP) risk reduction remains a critical aim in epilepsy care. To date, only aggressive medical and surgical efforts to control seizures have been ...demonstrated to be of benefit. Incomplete understanding of SUDEP mechanisms limits the development of more specific interventions. Periictal cardiorespiratory dysfunction is implicated in SUDEP; postictal electroencephalography (EEG) suppression, coma, and immobility may also play a role. Nocturnal supervision is protective against SUDEP, presumably by permitting intervention in the case of a life‐threatening event. Resuscitative efforts were implemented promptly in near‐SUDEP cases but delayed in SUDEP deaths in the Mortality in Epilepsy Monitoring Unit Study (MORTEMUS) study. Nursing interventions—including repositioning, oral suctioning, and oxygen administration—reduce seizure duration, respiratory dysfunction, and EEG suppression in the epilepsy monitoring unit (EMU), but have not been studied in outpatients. Cardiac pacemakers or cardioverter‐defibrillator devices may be of benefit in a few select individuals. A role for implantable neurostimulators has not yet been established. Seizure detection devices, including those that monitor generalized tonic–clonic seizure‐associated movements or cardiorespiratory parameters, may provide a means to permit timely periictal intervention. However, these and other devices, such as antisuffocation pillows, have not been adequately investigated with respect to SUDEP prevention.
Current resuscitation guidelines endorse placing the unconscious and normally breathing victims in the recovery position (RP), but this technique might hinder breathing evaluation.
To compare ...breathing evaluation and cardiac arrest detection: placing the victim in RP and checking breathing regularly, placing the victim in RP while re-evaluating breathing every minute, and placing the victim on his back, maintaining an open airway with the head-tilt-chin-lift technique and continuously checking breathing.
Schoolchildren aged 10–12 with no previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training, from three different primary schools were randomly allocated into groups to receive a CPR course involving one of the three strategies. Then a human simulation took place.
192 schoolchildren (64 per group) were randomly selected and received one of the courses. 182 participants who correctly assessed the victim were compared: 16 (26.2%) out of the 59 participants using RP and checking breathing regularly detected cardiac arrest before the end of the simulation, compared to 41 (67.20%) out of 61 using RP re-evaluating breathing every minute, and 56 (90.3%) out of 62 using head-tilt-chin-lift. Statistically significant differences were found between the RP groups (p < 0.001; OR = 5.766) as well as between the Head-tilt-chin-lift and both RP groups (p < 0.001; OR = 21.094), (p = 0.002; OR = 4.553).
The strategy involving head-tilt-chin-lift significantly increased the likelihood of detecting cardiac arrest. Re-evaluating every minute when the RP was used significantly increased the likelihood of detecting cardiac arrest.
Abstract Background Resuscitation guidelines endorse unconscious and normally breathing out-of-hospital victims to be placed in the recovery position to secure airway patency, but recently a debate ...has been opened as to whether the recovery position threatens the cardiac arrest victim's safety assessment and delays the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Aim To compare the assessment of the victim's breathing arrest while placed in the recovery position versus maintaining an open airway with the continuous head tilt and chin lift technique to know whether the recovery position delays the cardiac arrest victim's assessment and the start of cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods Basic life support-trained university students were randomly divided into two groups: one received a standardized cardiopulmonary resuscitation refresher course including the recovery position and the other received a modified cardiopulmonary resuscitation course using continuous head tilt and chin lift for unconscious and spontaneously breathing patients. A human simulation test to evaluate the victim's breathing assessment was performed a week later. Result In total, 59 participants with an average age of 21.9 years were included. Only 14 of 27 (51.85%) students in the recovery position group versus 23 of 28 (82.14%) in the head tilt and chin lift group p = 0.006 (OR 6.571) detected breathing arrest within 2 min. Conclusion The recovery position hindered breathing assessment, delayed breathing arrest identification and the initiation of cardiac compressions, and significantly increased the likelihood of not starting cardiopulmonary resuscitation when compared to the results shown when the continuous head tilt and chin lift technique was used.
To conduct a systematic review of the use of the recovery position in adults and children with non-traumatic decreased levels of responsiveness changes outcomes in comparison with other positioning ...strategies.
We searched Medline (Ovid), Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL, medRxiv and Google Scholar from inception to 15 March 2021 for studies involving adults and children in an out-of-hospital, first aid setting who had reduced levels of responsiveness of non-traumatic aetiology but did not require resuscitative interventions. We used the ROBINS-I tool to assess risk of bias and GRADE methodology to determine the certainty of evidence.
Of 17,947 citations retrieved, three prospective observational studies and four case series were included. The prone and semi-recumbent positions were associated with a decreased rate of suspected aspiration pneumonia in acute poisoning. Use of the recovery position in paediatric patients with decreased levels of responsiveness was associated with a deceased admission rate and the prone position was the position most commonly associated with sudden unexpected death in epilepsy. High risk of bias, imprecision and indirectness of evidence limited our ability to perform pooled analyses.
We identified a limited number of observational studies and case series comparing outcomes following use of the recovery position with outcomes when other patient positions were used. There was limited evidence to support or revise existing first aid guidance; however, greater emphasis on the initial assessment of responsiveness and need for CPR, as well as the detection and management of patient deterioration of a person identified with decreased responsiveness, is recommended.
Background: In Germany, current school-based first aid training recommendations do not include children under 13 years. Our aim was therefore to evaluate a primary school-based first aid course for ...children aged 6–13 years. Methods: Our 2-day course (4 hours per day) for primary schools in the German rural state Brandenburg included basic elements of scene safety, compression bandages, recovery position, and resuscitation. The evaluation of specific knowledge and skills took place 1-day post-course. Results: Among the 1,268 included children (median age 9y, 49% girls) from six primary schools, 25% had previously attended first aid courses. Most children knew emergency phone number(s) pre-course. Afterward, this knowledge improved by 15% in the 6–7-year age group (reaching 80%) whereas it remained at 90% in children aged 8–13 years. After the course, about 80% of the 8–13-year-old children (40% in 6–7-year age group) answered at least one resuscitation question correctly. In the practical skill assessments, about 80% of the 8–13-year-old children (60% in the 6–7-year age group) chose a correct or almost-correct chest compression rate during resuscitation. The correct depth of compression was achieved by about 80% (10–13 years), 60% (8–9 years), and 40% (6–7 years). Three-quarters successfully put another child in the recovery position; more than two-thirds applied a compression bandage appropriately. Conclusions: A 2-day course in a primary school setting showed considerable improvement in first aid and resuscitation skills of children aged 6–13 years. Future studies should examine these effects’ sustainability and the appropriate timing for refresher courses. Zusammenfassung Hintergrund: In Deutschland umfassen die aktuellen schulbasierten Erste-Hilfe-Schulungsempfehlungen keine Kinder unter 13 Jahren. Unser Ziel war es daher, einen Erste-Hilfe-Kurs für Grundschulen zu evaluieren. Material und Methode: Unser zweitägiger Kurs (4 Stunden pro Tag) für Grundschulen im Bundesland Brandenburg umfasste Basiselemente der eigenen Sicherheit am Unfallort, Kompressionsverbände, stabile Seitenlage und Wiederbelebung. Nach der Basiserhebung kurz vor Schulungsbeginn fand die Evaluation spezifischer Kenntnisse (mit Fragebogen) und Fertigkeiten einen Tag nach dem Kurs statt. Ergebnisse Unter den 1.268 eingeschlossenen Kindern (Altersmedian 9 Jahre, 49% Mädchen) von sechs Grundschulen hatten 25% bereits früher an einem Erste-Hilfe-Kurs teilgenommen. Die meisten Kinder kannten vor dem Kurs bereits die Notrufnummer(n). Danach verbesserte sich dieses Wissen um 15% und erreichte 80% in der Altersgruppe der 6-7-Jährigen, während es bei älteren Kindern (8-13 Jahre) bei 90% blieb. Nach dem Kurs beantworteten 40% der 6-7-Jährigen und etwa 80% der 8-13-jährigen Kinder mindestens eine Frage zur Reanimation richtig. Bei den Bewertungen der praktischen Fertigkeiten wählten 60% der 6-7-Jährigen und etwa 80% der 8-13-jährigen Kinder während der Wiederbelebung die korrekte oder nahezu korrekte Rate der Kompression des Brustkorbs aus. Die richtige Kompressionstiefe wurde von 40% (6-7 Jahre), 60% (8-9 Jahre) und etwa 80% (10-13 Jahre) erreicht. Drei Viertel der Teilnehmenden setzten erfolgreich ein anderes Kind in die Stabile Seitenlage; mehr als zwei Drittel legten einen Kompressionsverband angemessen an. Schlussfolgerungen Ein zweitägiger Kurs in der Grundschule führte in allen Altersgruppen von 6-13 Jahren zu einer deutlichen Verbesserung ihrer Kenntnisse in Erster-Hilfe und Fähigkeiten bei der Wiederbelebung. Zukünftige Studien sollten die Nachhaltigkeit dieser Effekte und den geeigneten Zeitpunkt für Auffrischungskurse untersuchen. Streszczenie Tło Obecne zalecenia dotyczące szkolenia z pierwszej pomocy w niemieckich szkołach nie obejmują dzieci poniżej 13 roku życia. Naszym celem było zatem ocenienie kursu pierwszej pomocy dla dzieci w wieku od 6 do 13 lat prowadzonego w szkole podstawowej. Metody Nasz dwudniowy kurs (4 godziny dziennie) dla szkół podstawowych na obszarach wiejskich w niemieckim kraju związkowym Brandenburgia obejmował podstawowe elementy bezpieczeństwa w miejscu zdarzenia, bandażowanie uciskowe, pozycję bezpieczną i resuscytację. Ocena konkretnych umiejętności i wiedzy odbyła się dzień po zakończeniu kursu. Wyniki Wśród 1268 uwzględnionych dzieci (średni wiek 9 lat, 49% dziewczyn) z sześciu szkół podstawowych, 25% uczestniczyło wcześniej w kursach pierwszej pomocy. Większość dzieci przed kursem znała już numer(y) alarmowy. Po kursie wiedza ta poprawiła się o 15% w grupie wiekowej 6-7 lat (osiągając 80%), podczas gdy w grupie wiekowej 8-13 lat pozostała na poziomie 90%. Po kursie około 80% dzieci w wieku od 8 do 13 lat (40% w grupie wiekowej 6-7 lat) poprawnie odpowiedziało na co najmniej jedno pytanie dotyczące resuscytacji. W ocenach praktycznych umiejętności, około 80% dzieci w wieku od 8 do 13 lat (60% w grupie wiekowej 6-7 lat) wybrało właściwe lub prawie właściwe tempo ucisków klatki piersiowej podczas resuscytacji. Prawidłowa głębokość ucisków była osiągana przez około 80% (w wieku od 10 do 13 lat), 60% (w wieku od 8 do 9 lat) i 40% (w wieku od 6 do 7 lat). Trzy czwarte dzieci skutecznie ułożyło inne dziecko w pozycji bezpiecznej, a ponad dwie trzecie odpowiednio zastosowało bandaż uciskowy. Wnioski Dwudniowy kurs przeprowadzony w szkole podstawowej wykazał znaczną poprawę umiejętności pierwszej pomocy i resuscytacji u dzieci w wieku od 6 do 13 lat. W przyszłych badaniach należy zbadać trwałość tych efektów oraz odpowiedni czas na odświeżenie wiedzy pozyskanej na kursach. Schlüsselwörter: Grundschule, Erste Hilfe, Wiederbelebung, Laienschulung, Schulkinder, Schüler, Basisreanimation, Klassenzimmer, Blutungsstillung, Kompressionsverband, Stabile Seitenlage, Wiederbelebung, Laien-Wiederbelebung Słowa kluczowe: szkoła podstawowa, pierwsza pomoc, resuscytacja, szkolenie dla laików, dzieci szkolne, uczniowie
How to perform first aid Gloster, Annabella Satu; Johnson, Phillip John
Nursing standard,
2016-Jan-13, 2016-01-13, 20160113, Letnik:
30, Številka:
20
Journal Article
Recenzirano
RATIONALE AND KEY POINTS: This article aims to help nurses to perform first aid in a safe, effective and patient-centred manner. First aid comprises a series of simple, potentially life-saving steps ...that an individual can perform with minimal equipment. Although it is not a legal requirement to respond to an emergency situation outside of work, nurses have a professional duty to respond and provide care within the limits of their competency. First aid is the provision of immediate medical assistance to an ill or injured person until definitive medical treatment can be accessed. First aid can save lives and it is essential that nurses understand the basic principles. REFLECTIVE ACTIVITY: Clinical skills articles can help update your practice and ensure it remains evidence based. Apply this article to your practice. Reflect on and write a short account of: 1. Your skill in performing first aid and any areas where you may need to extend your knowledge. 2. How reading this article will change your practice. Subscribers can upload their reflective accounts at: rcni.com/portfolio .
PDF
