Odgovor na pitanje o tome postoji li napetost između uvida da nam koncept dispozitiva otkriva promjenljivost objektivne stvarnosti i teorije da projektiranje arhitektonskog objekta zavisi od različitih elemenata koji su obuhvaćeni konceptom dispozitiva. Glavna je teza ovoga članka da primjena dispozitiva u polju arhitekture pomaže boljem razumijevanju tog koncepta – od Michela Foucaulta, preko Gillesa Deleuzea do Giorgia Agambena. U članku iznosim argumente u prilog tvrdnji da se nestabilan filozofski koncept dispositifa može precizirati iskustvima arhitektonske prakse i teorije. Pokazat ću ne samo zašto je arhitektu potrebna filozofija nego i obratno, zašto arhitekt i njegova praksa mogu pomoći filozofima. The answer to the question of whether there is a tension between the insight that the concept of dispositif reveals to us the variability of objective reality and the theory that the design of an architectural object depends on the various elements captured by the concept of dispositif The primary thesis of this paper is that the application of dispositifs in the field of architecture helps us to better understand this concept – from Michel Foucault to Gilles Deleuze to Giorgio Agamben. In other words, the paper presents arguments that the unstable philosophical concept of dispositif can be made more precise through the experiences of architectural practice and theory. On this occasion, I would like to show not only why architects need philosophy, but also, conversely, how an architect and his practice can help philosophers.