Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • NCOG-32. THE SPECIFIC PSYCH...
    Spieker, Mareike; Rapp, Marion; Goebel, Simone; Karger, André; Rieger, David; Grosse, Lucia; Bombach, Paula; Kurz, Sylvia; Hippler, Melina; Tatagiba, Marcos; Sabel, Michael; Tabatabai, Ghazaleh; Renovanz, Mirjam

    Neuro-oncology (Charlottesville, Va.), 11/2023, Letnik: 25, Številka: Supplement_5
    Journal Article

    Abstract OBJECTIVE The diagnosis of a brain tumor represents high burden for the patients’ caregivers (CG). Psychosocial screening tools adapted to the burden profile of CG are urgently required but do not exist. The aim was to develop a problem list for neuro-oncological CGs’ unmet needs for an application in combination to the Distress Thermometer scale. METHODS CG were prospectively assessed regarding changes in everyday life, relationship, social life, emotional, physical problems, and support needs, either via questionnaire (Center A) or by a qualitative interview (center B). A qualitative content analysis was performed by an inductive/deductive approach using MAXQDA® software. RESULTS A total of 50 caregivers were assessed (25 in center A via questionnaire, 25 in center B via interviews) during outpatient visits. Most frequently reported need was the need for psychological support (29/50, 58%). This was true after initial diagnosis (26/50, 52%) as well as in case of clinical deterioration of their loved-one (30/50, 60%). The results leaded to problem categories, congruent to the NCCN distress thermometer categories for cancer patients (practical, social, emotional, physical, and spiritual/existential problems). We detected new topics including “constraints/organization of (medical) appointments” (25/50, 50%) or “constant availability required for partner” (21/50, 42%). Also, 70% (35/50) put their own interests last or adapted their leisure activities. In the qualitative interviews (Center B), further items were identified, e.g., “dealing with psychological problems of the patient” (3/25, 12%), “different coping strategies among patient/caregiver” (4/25, 16%). We defined additional problem categories specifically adapted to CG of neurooncological patients, e.g., “problems due to neurocognitive/neuropsychological symptoms of the loved-one” and “problems with role as a caregiver”. CONCLUSION The interviews reflected the unmet needs of brain tumor caregivers. Our problem list developed for CG of neurooncological patients might allow for the targeted assessment and optimization of care.