Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Evaluating the risk of ovar...
    Van Calster, Ben; Van Hoorde, Kirsten; Valentin, Lil; Testa, Antonia C; Fischerova, Daniela; Van Holsbeke, Caroline; Savelli, Luca; Franchi, Dorella; Epstein, Elisabeth; Kaijser, Jeroen; Van Belle, Vanya; Czekierdowski, Artur; Guerriero, Stefano; Fruscio, Robert; Lanzani, Chiara; Scala, Felice; Bourne, Tom; Timmerman, Dirk

    BMJ (Online), 10/2014, Letnik: 349, Številka: oct07 3
    Journal Article

    Objectives To develop a risk prediction model to preoperatively discriminate between benign, borderline, stage I invasive, stage II-IV invasive, and secondary metastatic ovarian tumours.Design Observational diagnostic study using prospectively collected clinical and ultrasound data.Setting 24 ultrasound centres in 10 countries.Participants Women with an ovarian (including para-ovarian and tubal) mass and who underwent a standardised ultrasound examination before surgery. The model was developed on 3506 patients recruited between 1999 and 2007, temporally validated on 2403 patients recruited between 2009 and 2012, and then updated on all 5909 patients.Main outcome measures Histological classification and surgical staging of the mass.Results The Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX) model contains three clinical and six ultrasound predictors: age, serum CA-125 level, type of centre (oncology centres v other hospitals), maximum diameter of lesion, proportion of solid tissue, more than 10 cyst locules, number of papillary projections, acoustic shadows, and ascites. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the classic discrimination between benign and malignant tumours was 0.94 (0.93 to 0.95) on temporal validation. The AUC was 0.85 for benign versus borderline, 0.92 for benign versus stage I cancer, 0.99 for benign versus stage II-IV cancer, and 0.95 for benign versus secondary metastatic. AUCs between malignant subtypes varied between 0.71 and 0.95, with an AUC of 0.75 for borderline versus stage I cancer and 0.82 for stage II-IV versus secondary metastatic. Calibration curves showed that the estimated risks were accurate.Conclusions The ADNEX model discriminates well between benign and malignant tumours and offers fair to excellent discrimination between four types of ovarian malignancy. The use of ADNEX has the potential to improve triage and management decisions and so reduce morbidity and mortality associated with adnexal pathology.