Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Application of CFD on the o...
    Ortega-Casanova, J.

    Chemical engineering and processing, 07/2017, Letnik: 117
    Journal Article

    Response surfaces of: (a) efficiency η; (b) pumping power II; and (c) mixing energy cost mec. Display omitted •The response surface methodology has been used to optimize a micromixing unit.•The grid convergence study shows that previous results from the same geometry have a huge uncertainty.•Depending on different targets, different optimal geometries are proposed.•The geometry giving the highest mixing efficiency is shown to be also good when it works as a microreactor. The optimization of a mixing unit by means of CFD (computational fluid dynamics) and RSM (response surface methodology) is presented in this work. The starting geometry is the one studied by Fang and co-workers 14 consisting in a T-type microchannel with the mixing unit inserted in the straight main channel. The mixing takes place at a very low Reynolds number and is promoted by means of two bars at 69° each with respect to the mixing unit walls. These angles are the input parameters of the optimization process while the output ones are the mixing efficiency, the needed pumping power to run the channel and the mixing energy cost. Fang and co-workers found numerically an efficiency of around 22% when one mixing unit was employed, while an almost perfect mixing could be reached by using 28 of them. However, they did not carry out a grid convergence study and their results were got for just one mesh. Due to this, before the optimization tasks and thanks to the Grid Convergence Index, it is shown that Fang and co-workers’ mixing efficiency has an uncertainty of around 40%. This is due to the fact that, with the optimal grid, the mixing efficiency is around 12.5% which is quite far from what Fang and co-workers said. Additionally, with the RSM and by using the optimal mesh, it is found that the optimal angles α1 and α2 are: ∼76° and ∼62° to get the highest efficiency which is around 14%; and ∼72° and ∼74° to get both the lowest pumping power to run the channel and the lowest mixing energy cost. The performing of the micromixer as a microreactor, where a basic reaction must take place, is finally assessed.