E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Latenstein, Carmen S S; Wennmacker, Sarah Z; van Dijk, Aafke H; Drenth, Joost P H; Westert, Gert P; van Laarhoven, Cornelis J. H M; Boermeester, Marja A; de Reuver, Philip R; Dijkgraaf, Marcel G W
Annals of surgery, 08/2022, Letnik: 276, Številka: 2Journal Article
OBJECTIVE:To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of restrictive strategy versus usual care in patients with gallstones and abdominal pain. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA:A restrictive selection strategy for surgery in patients with gallstones reduces cholecystectomies, but the impact on overall costs and cost-effectiveness is unknown. METHODS:Data of a multicentre, randomized-controlled trial (SECURE-trial) were used. Adult patients with gallstones and abdominal pain were included. Restrictive strategy was economically evaluated against usual care from a societal perspective. Hospital-use of resources was gathered with case-report forms and out-of-hospital consultations, out-of-pocket expenses, and productivity loss were collected with questionnaires. National unit costing was applied. The primary outcome was the cost per pain-free patient after 12 months. RESULTS:All 1067 randomized patients (49.0 years, 73.7% females) were included. After 12 months, 56.2% of patients was pain-free in restrictive strategy versus 59.8% after usual care. The restrictive strategy significantly reduced the cholecystectomy rate with 7.7% and reduced surgical costs with 160 per patient, 162 was saved from a societal perspective. The cost-effectiveness plane showed that restrictive strategy was cost saving in 89.1%, but resulted in less pain-free patients in 88.5%. Overall, the restrictive strategy saved 4563 from a societal perspective per pain-free patient lost. CONCLUSIONS:A restrictive selection strategy for cholecystectomy saves 162 compared to usual care, but results in fewer pain-free patients. The incremental cost per pain-free patient are savings of 4563 per pain-free patient lost. The higher societal willingness to pay for one extra pain-free patient, the lower the probability that the restrictive strategy will be cost-effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION:The Netherlands National Trial Register NTR4022. Registered on 5 June 2013.
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.