E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Fischer, Urs; Branca, Mattia; Bonati, Leo H.; Carrera, Emmanuel; Vargas, Maria I.; Platon, Alexandra; Kulcsar, Zsolt; Wegener, Susanne; Luft, Andreas; Seiffge, David J.; Arnold, Marcel; Michel, Patrik; Strambo, Davide; Dunet, Vincent; De Marchis, Gian Marco; Schelosky, Ludwig; Andreisek, Gustav; Barinka, Filip; Peters, Nils; Fisch, Loraine; Nedeltchev, Krassen; Cereda, Carlo W.; Kägi, Georg; Bolognese, Manuel; Salmen, Stephan; Sturzenegger, Rolf; Medlin, Friedrich; Berger, Christian; Renaud, Susanne; Bonvin, Christophe; Schaerer, Michael; Mono, Marie‐Luise; Rodic, Biljana; Psychogios, Marios; Mordasini, Pasquale; Gralla, Jan; Kaesmacher, Johannes; Meinel, Thomas R.
Annals of neurology, August 2022, 2022-08-00, 20220801, Letnik: 92, Številka: 2Journal Article
Objective To examine rates of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), mechanical thrombectomy (MT), door‐to‐needle (DTN) time, door‐to‐puncture (DTP) time, and functional outcome between patients with admission magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) versus computed tomography (CT). Methods An observational cohort study of consecutive patients using a target trial design within the nationwide Swiss‐Stroke‐Registry from January 2014 to August 2020 was carried out. Exclusion criteria included MRI contraindications, transferred patients, and unstable or frail patients. Multilevel mixed‐effects logistic regression with multiple imputation was used to calculate adjusted odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals for IVT, MT, DTN, DTP, and good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) at 90 days. Results Of the 11,049 patients included (mean SD age, 71 15 years; 4,811 44% women; 69% ischemic stroke, 16% transient ischemic attack, 8% stroke mimics, 6% intracranial hemorrhage), 3,741 (34%) received MRI and 7,308 (66%) CT. Patients undergoing MRI had lower National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (median interquartile range 2 0–6 vs 4 1–11), and presented later after symptom onset (150 vs 123 min, p < 0.001). Admission MRI was associated with: lower adjusted odds of IVT (aOR 0.83, 0.73–0.96), but not with MT (aOR 1.11, 0.93–1.34); longer adjusted DTN (+22 min 13–30), but not with longer DTP times; and higher adjusted odds of favorable outcome (aOR 1.54, 1.30–1.81). Interpretation We found an association of MRI with lower rates of IVT and a significant delay in DTN, but not in DTP and rates of MT. Given the delays in workflow metrics, prospective trials are required to show that tissue‐based benefits of baseline MRI compensate for the temporal benefits of CT. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:184–194
Avtor
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.