Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Use of near‐infrared system...
    Meertens, Robert; Casanova, Francesco; Knapp, Karen M.; Thorn, Clare; Strain, William David

    Journal of orthopaedic research, October 2018, 2018-10-00, 20181001, Letnik: 36, Številka: 10
    Journal Article

    ABSTRACT A range of technologies using near infrared (NIR) light have shown promise at providing real time measurements of hemodynamic markers in bone tissue in vivo, an exciting prospect given existing difficulties in measuring hemodynamics in bone tissue. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the evidence for this potential use of NIR systems, establishing their potential as a research tool in this field. Major electronic databases including MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched using pre‐planned search strategies with broad scope for any in vivo use of NIR technologies in human bone tissue. Following identification of studies by title and screening, full text inclusion was determined by double blind assessment using predefined criteria. Full text studies for inclusion were data extracted using a predesigned proforma and quality assessed. Narrative synthesis was appropriate given the wide heterogeneity of included studies. Eighty‐eight full text studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria, 57 addressing laser Doppler flowmetry (56 intra‐operatively), 21 near infrared spectroscopy, and 10 photoplethysmography. The heterogeneity of the methodologies included differing hemodynamic markers, measurement protocols, anatomical locations, and research applications, making meaningful direct comparisons impossible. Further, studies were often limited by small sample sizes with potential selection biases, detection biases, and wide variability in results between participants. Despite promising potential in the use of NIR light to interrogate bone circulation, the application of NIR systems in bone requires rigorous assessment of the reproducibility of potential hemodynamic markers and further validation of these markers against alternative physiologically relevant reference standards. © 2018 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:2595–2603, 2018.