Background Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of nonischemic heart failure and death in young adults. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has become part of the diagnostic workup in idiopathic and familial DCM. More than 50 DCM genes have been identified, revealing great molecular heterogeneity and variable diagnostic yield. Interpretation of variant pathogenicity is challenging particularly in underrepresented populations, as pathogenic variant databases include studies mainly from European/Caucasian populations. To date, no studies on genomic diagnosis of DCM have been conducted in Mexico. Methods We recruited 55 unrelated DCM patients, 22 familial (F‐DCM), and 33 idiopathic (I‐DCM), and performed site‐directed NGS seeking causal mutations. Diagnostic yield was defined as the proportion of individuals with at least one pathogenic (P) or likely pathogenic (LP) variant in DCM genes. Results Overall diagnostic yield was 47.3%, and higher in F‐DCM (63.6%) than in I‐DCM (36.4%, p = 0.047). Overall, NGS disclosed 41 variants of clinical interest (61.0% novel), 27 were classified as P/LP and 14 of unknown clinical significance. Of P/LP variants, 10 were A‐band region TTN truncating variants, five were found in DSP (18.5%), five in MYH7 (18.5%), two in LMNA (7.4%), and one in RBM20, ABCC9, FKTN, ACTA1, and TNNT2. NGS findings suggested autosomal recessive inheritance in three families, two with DSP loss of function mutations in affected individuals. The increasing number of mutation reports in DCM, increasing knowledge on the functional consequences of mutations, mutational hotspots and functional domains of DCM‐related proteins, the recent refinement ACMG/ClinGen Guidelines, and co‐segregation analysis in DCM families helped increase the diagnostic yield. Conclusion This is the first NGS study performed in a group of Mexican DCM patients, contributing to understand the mutational spectrum and complexity of DCM molecular diagnosis. Molecular diagnosis in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is challenging, particularly in underrepresented populations. We obtained a relatively high diagnostic yield in familial DCM (63.6%) and in idiopathic DCM (47.3%) in a group of Mexican patients. The increasing number of reports of mutations in DCM patients, the increasing knowledge on the functional consequences of mutations, mutational hotspots and functional domains of some DCM‐related proteins, the refinement ACMG/ClinGen Guidelines and co‐segregation analysis helped achieve this higher diagnostic yield.