Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano
  • Effect of an l -Carnitine–C...
    Bonomini, Mario, MD; Di Liberato, Lorenzo, MD; Del Rosso, Goffredo, MD; Stingone, Antonio, MD; Marinangeli, Giancarlo, MD; Consoli, Agostino, MD; Bertoli, Silvio, MD; De Vecchi, Amedeo, MD; Bosi, Emanuele, MD; Russo, Roberto, MD; Corciulo, Roberto, MD; Gesualdo, Loreto, MD; Giorgino, Francesco, MD; Cerasoli, Paolo, MD; Di Castelnuovo, Augusto, PhD; Monaco, Maria Pia, MD; Shockley, Ty, ScD; Rossi, Claudia, PhD; Arduini, Arduino, MD

    American journal of kidney diseases, 11/2013, Letnik: 62, Številka: 5
    Journal Article

    Background In peritoneal dialysis, the high glucose load absorbed from dialysis fluid contributes to several metabolic abnormalities, including insulin resistance. We evaluate the efficacy of a peritoneal dialysis solution containing l -carnitine as an additive to improve insulin sensitivity. Study Design Multicenter parallel randomized controlled trial. Setting & Participants Nondiabetic uremic patients on continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis enrolled in 8 peritoneal dialysis centers. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive peritoneal dialysis diurnal exchanges with either a standard glucose-based solution (1.5% or 2.5% according to the patient's need) or a glucose-based solution (identical glucose amount) enriched with l -carnitine (0.1%, weight/volume; 2 g/bag) for 4 months, the nocturnal exchange with icodextrin being unmodified. Outcomes & Measurements The primary outcome was insulin sensitivity, measured by the magnitude of change from baseline in glucose infusion rate (in milligrams per kilogram of body weight per minute) during a euglycemic hyperinsulinemic clamp. Secondary outcomes were safety and tolerability, body fluid management, peritoneal dialysis efficiency parameters, and biochemistry tests. Results 35 patients were randomly assigned, whereas 27 patients (standard solution, n=12; experimental solution, n = 15) were analyzed. Adverse events were not attributable to treatment. Glucose infusion rates in the l -carnitine–treated group increased from 3.8 ± 2.0 (SD) mg/kg/min at baseline to 5.0 ± 2.2 mg/kg/min at day 120 ( P = 0.03) compared with 4.8 ± 2.4 mg/kg/min at baseline and 4.7 ± 2.4 mg/kg/min at day 120 observed in the control group ( P = 0.8). The difference in glucose infusion rates between groups was 1.3 (95% CI, 0.0-2.6) mg/kg/min. In patients treated with l -carnitine–containing solution, urine volume did not change significantly ( P = 0.1) compared to a significant diuresis reduction found in the other group ( P = 0.02). For peritoneal function, no differences were observed during the observation period. Limitations Small sample size. Conclusions The use of l -carnitine in dialysis solutions may represent a new approach to improving insulin sensitivity in nondiabetic peritoneal dialysis patients.