E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Declève, Quentin
European papers (Online. periodico), 2019, Letnik: 4, Številka: 1Journal Article
In its judgment in Achmea (judgment of 6 March 2018, case C-284/16 GC), the Court of Justice ruled that an investor-State arbitration clause in a bilateral investment treaty concluded between two EU Member States was contrary to the principle of the autonomy of the EU legal order. In this Article, I suggest that the Achmea judgment could have implications for the validity, not only of ISDS clauses in intra-EU BITs, but also of ISDS and applicable law clauses in BITs and other agreements concluded by the EU (or its Member States) with third States.
