E-viri
-
Steentjes, S.; Petrun, M.; Dolinar, D.; Hameyer, K.
IEEE transactions on magnetics 52, Številka: 5Journal Article
This paper compares two different identification methods of a static rate-independent energy-based hysteresis model with regard to the dynamic hysteresis loop shape prediction when coupled to the parametric magnetodynamic lamination model. The values of hysteresis model parameters are determined solely based on the quasi-static major loop. A semiphysical approach identifying the reversible and irreversible field components independently and a purely mathematical scheme using a differential evolution optimization algorithm determining all parameters simultaneously are compared. Both variants of parameter identification are analyzed in terms of hysteresis loop shape prediction for quasi-static as well as dynamic loops.
