We determined the effects of shorter affected side crank arm lengths and cycling with two different prostheses on joint and crank power, asymmetry, and net efficiency. 12 participants with a TTA rode at 1.5 W·kg -1 with equal (175 mm) and shorter affected side crank arms (160, 165, 170 mm) using a daily-use prosthesis and CSP. We used statistical parametric mapping to determine differences in instantaneous joint and crank power between prostheses, and linear mixed-effects models to compare average joint and crank power, asymmetry, and net efficiency. Shorter affected side crank arm lengths reduced the magnitude of peak positive (p ≤ 0.001) and negative (p < 0.001) crank power on the affected side. Use of a CSP increased the magnitude of peak positive knee power (p < 0.001) and decreased the magnitude of peak negative crank power (p < 0.001) on the affected side compared to a daily-use prosthesis. Shorter affected side crank arm lengths while using a CSP reduced average hip joint (p = 0.014) and hip transfer (p = 0.025) power asymmetry from 35% to 20% and 118% to 62%, respectively. However, we found no significant differences in affected side average joint or crank power, knee joint or crank power asymmetry, or net efficiency. Cycling at 1.5 W·kg -1 with unequal crank arm lengths and CSPs improves hip joint power and hip transfer power asymmetry but does not alter crank asymmetry or net efficiency for recreational cyclists with a TTA.