Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Chemohormonal Therapy in Me...
    Kyriakopoulos, Christos E; Chen, Yu-Hui; Carducci, Michael A; Liu, Glenn; Jarrard, David F; Hahn, Noah M; Shevrin, Daniel H; Dreicer, Robert; Hussain, Maha; Eisenberger, Mario; Kohli, Manish; Plimack, Elizabeth R; Vogelzang, Nicholas J; Picus, Joel; Cooney, Matthew M; Garcia, Jorge A; DiPaola, Robert S; Sweeney, Christopher J

    Journal of clinical oncology, 04/2018, Letnik: 36, Številka: 11
    Journal Article

    Purpose Docetaxel added to androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) significantly increases the longevity of some patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Herein, we present the outcomes of the CHAARTED (Chemohormonal Therapy Versus Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer) trial with more mature follow-up and focus on tumor volume. Patients and Methods In this phase III study, 790 patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer were equally randomly assigned to receive either ADT in combination with docetaxel 75 mg/m for up to six cycles or ADT alone. The primary end point of the study was overall survival (OS). Additional analyses of the prospectively defined low- and high-volume disease subgroups were performed. High-volume disease was defined as presence of visceral metastases and/or ≥ four bone metastases with at least one outside of the vertebral column and pelvis. Results At a median follow-up of 53.7 months, the median OS was 57.6 months for the chemohormonal therapy arm versus 47.2 months for ADT alone (hazard ratio HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; P = .0018). For patients with high-volume disease (n = 513), the median OS was 51.2 months with chemohormonal therapy versus 34.4 months with ADT alone (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.79; P < .001). For those with low-volume disease (n = 277), no OS benefit was observed (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.55; P = .86). Conclusion The clinical benefit from chemohormonal therapy in prolonging OS was confirmed for patients with high-volume disease; however, for patients with low-volume disease, no OS benefit was discerned.