Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Evaluating different method...
    Donner, Sebastian; Kuhn, Jonas; Van Roozendael, Michel; Bais, Alkiviadis; Beirle, Steffen; Bösch, Tim; Bognar, Kristof; Bruchkouski, Ilya; Chan, Ka Lok; Dörner, Steffen; Drosoglou, Theano; Fayt, Caroline; Frieß, Udo; Hendrick, François; Hermans, Christian; Jin, Junli; Li, Ang; Ma, Jianzhong; Peters, Enno; Pinardi, Gaia; Richter, Andreas; Schreier, Stefan F; Seyler, André; Strong, Kimberly; Tirpitz, Jan-Lukas; Wang, Yang; Xie, Pinhua; Xu, Jin; Zhao, Xiaoyi; Wagner, Thomas

    Atmospheric measurement techniques, 02/2020, Letnik: 13, Številka: 2
    Journal Article

    We present different methods for in-field elevation calibration of MAX-DOAS (Multi AXis Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy) instruments that were applied and inter-compared during the second Cabauw Intercomparison campaign for Nitrogen Dioxide measuring Instruments (CINDI-2). One necessary prerequisite of consistent MAX-DOAS retrievals is a precise and accurate calibration of the elevation angles of the different measuring systems. Therefore, different methods for this calibration were applied to several instruments during the campaign, and the results were inter-compared.