The glacier surface ice velocity (SIV) is important in understanding the glacier state. This study presents results on the SIV of the 18 glaciers spread over the Indian central Himalaya (ICH). The SIV was computed by applying Co-registration of Optically Sensed Images and Correlation (COSI-Corr) technique on the Landsat time series data (1993–2017). Results show that the average SIV of all glaciers was 22.63 ± 5.8 m a−1 in 1993/94, which decreased (by ~23%) to 17.32 ± 3.1 m a−1 in 2000/01 and further declined (by ~33%) to 11.50 ± 1.7 m a−1 in 2015/16. Though a secular decline in average SIV is observed, rates of slowdown are considerably heterogeneous for the studied glaciers being largely determined by glaciers size, orientation, altitude and debris cover. Slope was found to have comparatively low influence on the glacier movement. Inter-regional comparison reveals that average SIVs of the ICH glaciers were slightly but consistently lower than that of the western and eastern Himalayan glaciers. Nonetheless, though moving slowly, ICH glaciers are more active than nearby Everest region glaciers with sufficient proportion of active glaciers (referred as Type-I; 39%). However, the point of concern is that owing to declining health, ICH-glaciers are progressively converting from Type-I to partially active (referred as Type-II), and Type-II to entirely stagnant (referred as Type-III). This observed slowdown coupled with negative mass balance and continuous debris growth (as reported in previous studies) may form favorable conditions for supraglacial lake development. We thereby recommend regular monitoring of glacier dynamics in this region for tenable assessment of climatic change impacts. •Velocities for 18 central Himalayan glaciers have been estimated between 1990 and 2015.•All the studied glaciers have significantly slowed-down during ~1990–2015.•Central Himalayan glaciers moved slowly than western and central Himalaya.•Entirely active glaciers have progressively been converted into entirely stagnant glaciers.•Glacier’ size, orientation, altitude and debris cover determine movement heterogeneity.