E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Foster, Nadine E; Anema, Johannes R; Cherkin, Dan; Chou, Roger; Cohen, Steven P; Gross, Douglas P; Ferreira, Paulo H; Fritz, Julie M; Koes, Bart W; Peul, Wilco; Turner, Judith A; Maher, Chris G; Buchbinder, Rachelle; Hartvigsen, Jan; Cherkin, Dan; Foster, Nadine E; Maher, Chris G; Underwood, Martin; van Tulder, Maurits; Anema, Johannes R; Chou, Roger; Cohen, Stephen P; Menezes Costa, Lucíola; Croft, Peter; Ferreira, Manuela; Ferreira, Paulo H; Fritz, Julie M; Genevay, Stéphane; Gross, Douglas P; Hancock, Mark J; Hoy, Damian; Karppinen, Jaro; Koes, Bart W; Kongsted, Alice; Louw, Quinette; Öberg, Birgitta; Peul, Wilco C; Pransky, Glenn; Schoene, Mark; Sieper, Joachim; Smeets, Rob J; Turner, Judith A; Woolf, Anthony
The Lancet (British edition), 06/2018, Letnik: 391, Številka: 10137Journal Article
Many clinical practice guidelines recommend similar approaches for the assessment and management of low back pain. Recommendations include use of a biopsychosocial framework to guide management with initial non-pharmacological treatment, including education that supports self-management and resumption of normal activities and exercise, and psychological programmes for those with persistent symptoms. Guidelines recommend prudent use of medication, imaging, and surgery. The recommendations are based on trials almost exclusively from high-income countries, focused mainly on treatments rather than on prevention, with limited data for cost-effectiveness. However, globally, gaps between evidence and practice exist, with limited use of recommended first-line treatments and inappropriately high use of imaging, rest, opioids, spinal injections, and surgery. Doing more of the same will not reduce back-related disability or its long-term consequences. The advances with the greatest potential are arguably those that align practice with the evidence, reduce the focus on spinal abnormalities, and ensure promotion of activity and function, including work participation. We have identified effective, promising, or emerging solutions that could offer new directions, but that need greater attention and further research to determine if they are appropriate for large-scale implementation. These potential solutions include focused strategies to implement best practice, the redesign of clinical pathways, integrated health and occupational interventions to reduce work disability, changes in compensation and disability claims policies, and public health and prevention strategies.
Avtor
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.