E-viri
Recenzirano
-
Yuan, Wenping; Cai, Wenwen; Xia, Jiangzhou; Chen, Jiquan; Liu, Shuguang; Dong, Wenjie; Merbold, Lutz; Law, Beverly; Arain, Altaf; Beringer, Jason; Bernhofer, Christian; Black, Andy; Blanken, Peter D.; Cescatti, Alessandro; Chen, Yang; Francois, Louis; Gianelle, Damiano; Janssens, Ivan A.; Jung, Martin; Kato, Tomomichi; Kiely, Gerard; Liu, Dan; Marcolla, Barbara; Montagnani, Leonardo; Raschi, Antonio; Roupsard, Olivier; Varlagin, Andrej; Wohlfahrt, Georg
Agricultural and forest meteorology, 07/2014, Letnik: 192-193Journal Article, Web Resource
•Seven light use efficiency models were compared at global eddy covariance towers.•Performance of seven models differed substantially among ecosystem types.•It is needed to improve LUE models by integrating impacts of diffuse radiation and reliable water stress equations. Simulating gross primary productivity (GPP) of terrestrial ecosystems has been a major challenge in quantifying the global carbon cycle. Many different light use efficiency (LUE) models have been developed recently, but our understanding of the relative merits of different models remains limited. Using CO2 flux measurements from multiple eddy covariance sites, we here compared and assessed major algorithms and performance of seven LUE models (CASA, CFix, CFlux, EC-LUE, MODIS, VPM and VPRM). Comparison between simulated GPP and estimated GPP from flux measurements showed that model performance differed substantially among ecosystem types. In general, most models performed better in capturing the temporal changes and magnitude of GPP in deciduous broadleaf forests and mixed forests than in evergreen broadleaf forests and shrublands. Six of the seven LUE models significantly underestimated GPP during cloudy days because the impacts of diffuse radiation on light use efficiency were ignored in the models. CFlux and EC-LUE exhibited the lowest root mean square error among all models at 80% and 75% of the sites, respectively. Moreover, these two models showed better performance than others in simulating interannual variability of GPP. Two pairwise comparisons revealed that the seven models differed substantially in algorithms describing the environmental regulations, particularly water stress, on GPP. This analysis highlights the need to improve representation of the impacts of diffuse radiation and water stress in the LUE models.
Avtor
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.