•Burned watersheds had similar turbidity to unburned watersheds during spring runoff.•Burned watersheds were more susceptible to precipitation driven sedimentation.Watersheds with more erodible soils had larger turbidity increases following precipitation events than other watersheds. In this work we explore watershed characteristics associated with increased turbidity following the 2013 West Fork Complex Fire (WFC) in southwest Colorado, USA with the goal of understanding the hydrologic and geomorphic controls on turbidity. Turbidity, precipitation, and stream discharge were measured from May to September in 2015 and 2016 in seven watersheds, four burned and three unburned. Slope, slope aspect, soil type, vegetation, and burn severity—as well as precipitation and discharge—were characterized as independent variables for each of the seven watersheds. During snowmelt-driven runoff from May to June, no significant difference in turbidity between burned and unburned watersheds was found. However, in results from July to September of both 2015 and 2016, burned watersheds had larger spikes in turbidity following precipitation events than unburned watersheds. In the watersheds with higher burn severity and poor vegetation recovery, positive correlations between total storm volume and turbidity existed, though short-term trends in Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) were not consistently correlated with turbidity changes with precipitation, nor were watershed slope and aspect alone. These results indicate that other drivers of turbidity in these burned watersheds, for example erodible soils, were more susceptible to precipitation than snowmelt due in part to processes like rain splash. Results from this work provide insight on characteristics that influence stream turbidity after a wildfire and can help watershed managers predict future wildfire impacts on water quality, the health of aquatic organisms, and water treatment infrastructure.