Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Celotno besedilo
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Immune checkpoint inhibitor...
    Ambrosini, M.; Rousseau, B.; Manca, P.; Artz, O.; Marabelle, A.; André, T.; Maddalena, G.; Mazzoli, G.; Intini, R.; Cohen, R.; Cercek, A.; Segal, N.H.; Saltz, L.; Varghese, A.M.; Yaeger, R.; Nusrat, M.; Goldberg, Z.; Ku, G.Y.; El Dika, I.; Margalit, O.; Grinshpun, A.; Murtaza Kasi, P.; Schilsky, R.; Lutfi, A.; Shacham-Shmueli, E.; Khan Afghan, M.; Weiss, L.; Westphalen, C.B.; Conca, V.; Decker, B.; Randon, G.; Elez, E.; Fakih, M.; Schrock, A.B.; Cremolini, C.; Jayachandran, P.; Overman, M.J.; Lonardi, S.; Pietrantonio, F.

    Annals of oncology, 07/2024, Letnik: 35, Številka: 7
    Journal Article

    POLE and POLD1 proofreading deficiency (POLE/D1pd) define a rare subtype of ultramutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC; over 100 mut/Mb). Disease-specific data about the activity and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in POLE/D1pd mCRC are lacking and it is unknown whether outcomes may be different from mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) mCRCs treated with ICIs. In this global study, we collected 27 patients with mCRC harboring POLE/D1 mutations leading to proofreading deficiency and treated with anti-programmed cell death-ligand 1 alone +/− anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 agents. We collected clinicopathological and genomic characteristics, response, and survival outcomes after ICIs of POLE/D1pd mCRC and compared them with a cohort of 610 dMMR/MSI-H mCRC patients treated with ICIs. Further genomic analyses were carried out in an independent cohort of 7241 CRCs to define POLE and POLD1pd molecular profiles and mutational signatures. POLE/D1pd was associated with younger age, male sex, fewer RAS/BRAF driver mutations, and predominance of right-sided colon cancers. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed a significantly higher overall response rate (ORR) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC (89% versus 54%; P = 0.01). After a median follow-up of 24.9 months (interquartile range: 11.3-43.0 months), patients with POLE/D1pd showed a significantly superior progression-free survival (PFS) compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC hazard ratio (HR) = 0.24, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.08-0.74, P = 0.01 and superior overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.12-1.18, P = 0.09). In multivariable analyses including the type of DNA repair defect, POLE/D1pd was associated with significantly improved PFS (HR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.04-0.69, P = 0.013) and OS (HR = 0.24, 95% CI 0.06-0.98, P = 0.047). Molecular profiling showed that POLE/D1pd tumors have higher tumor mutational burden (TMB). Responses were observed in both subtypes and were associated with the intensity of POLE/D1pd signature. Patients with POLE/D1pd mCRC showed more favorable outcomes compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC to treatment with ICIs in terms of tumor response and survival. •POLE/D1pd is associated with male sex, younger age, right-sided primary tumor, and uncommon KRAS mutations in mCRC.•A significantly higher ORR is observed for POLE/D1pd compared to dMMR/MSI-H mCRC treated with ICIs.•POLE/D1pd mCRC exposed to ICIs have a higher PFS and OS than dMMR/MSI-H.•POLE/D1pd mCRCs are enriched in single nucleotide variant while dMMR/MSI-H are enriched in frameshift mutations.•Non-responder POLEpd mCRCs have lower TMB than responders and lower intensity of the POLE signature.