Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • MOG encephalomyelitis: inte...
    Jarius, S; Paul, F; Aktas, O; Asgari, N; Dale, R C; de Seze, J; Franciotta, D; Fujihara, K; Jacob, A; Kim, H J; Kleiter, I; Kümpfel, T; Levy, M; Palace, J; Ruprecht, K; Saiz, A; Trebst, C; Weinshenker, B G; Wildemann, B

    Journal of neuroinflammation, 05/2018, Letnik: 15, Številka: 1
    Journal Article

    Over the past few years, new-generation cell-based assays have demonstrated a robust association of autoantibodies to full-length human myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) with (mostly recurrent) optic neuritis, myelitis and brainstem encephalitis, as well as with acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)-like presentations. Most experts now consider MOG-IgG-associated encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) a disease entity in its own right, immunopathogenetically distinct from both classic multiple sclerosis (MS) and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD). Owing to a substantial overlap in clinicoradiological presentation, MOG-EM was often unwittingly misdiagnosed as MS in the past. Accordingly, increasing numbers of patients with suspected or established MS are currently being tested for MOG-IgG. However, screening of large unselected cohorts for rare biomarkers can significantly reduce the positive predictive value of a test. To lessen the hazard of overdiagnosing MOG-EM, which may lead to inappropriate treatment, more selective criteria for MOG-IgG testing are urgently needed. In this paper, we propose indications for MOG-IgG testing based on expert consensus. In addition, we give a list of conditions atypical for MOG-EM ("red flags") that should prompt physicians to challenge a positive MOG-IgG test result. Finally, we provide recommendations regarding assay methodology, specimen sampling and data interpretation.