Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Calibration and bias correc...
    Hawkins, Ed; Osborne, Thomas M.; Ho, Chun Kit; Challinor, Andrew J.

    Agricultural and forest meteorology, 03/2013, Letnik: 170
    Journal Article

    ► Calibration methods can produce robust projections of daily temperature for crop models. ► The ‘perfect sibling’ approach could be more widely adopted to assess calibration techniques. ► ‘Delta’ methods perform best, but the use of several calibration methods is encouraged. ► Uncertainties from choice of calibration approach and climate model response are comparable. ► Use of a wide range of AOGCMs, calibration approaches and crop modelling strategies is essential. Producing projections of future crop yields requires careful thought about the appropriate use of atmosphere-ocean global climate model (AOGCM) simulations. Here we describe and demonstrate multiple methods for ‘calibrating’ climate projections using an ensemble of AOGCM simulations in a ‘perfect sibling’ framework. Crucially, this type of analysis assesses the ability of each calibration methodology to produce reliable estimates of future climate, which is not possible just using historical observations. This type of approach could be more widely adopted for assessing calibration methodologies for crop modelling. The calibration methods assessed include the commonly used ‘delta’ (change factor) and ‘nudging’ (bias correction) approaches. We focus on daily maximum temperature in summer over Europe for this idealised case study, but the methods can be generalised to other variables and other regions. The calibration methods, which are relatively easy to implement given appropriate observations, produce more robust projections of future daily maximum temperatures and heat stress than using raw model output. The choice over which calibration method to use will likely depend on the situation, but change factor approaches tend to perform best in our examples. Finally, we demonstrate that the uncertainty due to the choice of calibration methodology is a significant contributor to the total uncertainty in future climate projections for impact studies. We conclude that utilising a variety of calibration methods on output from a wide range of AOGCMs is essential to produce climate data that will ensure robust and reliable crop yield projections.