Akademska digitalna zbirka SLovenije - logo
E-viri
Recenzirano Odprti dostop
  • Child feces management prac...
    Bauza, Valerie; Majorin, Fiona; Routray, Parimita; Sclar, Gloria D.; Caruso, Bethany A.; Clasen, Thomas

    Science of the total environment, 03/2020, Letnik: 709
    Journal Article

    Safe child feces management (CFM) is likely critical for reducing exposure to fecal pathogens in and around the home, but the effectiveness of different CFM practices in reducing fecal contamination is not well understood. We conducted a cross-sectional study of households with children <6 years in rural Odisha, India, using household surveys (188 households), environmental sample analysis (373 samples for 80 child defecation events), and unstructured observation (33 households) to characterize practices and measure fecal contamination resulting from CFM-related practices, including defecation, feces handling and disposal, defecation area or tool cleaning, anal cleansing, and handwashing. For environmental sampling, we developed a sampling strategy that involved collecting samples at the time and place of child defecation to capture activity-level fecal contamination for CFM practices. Defecating on the floor or ground, which was practiced by 63.7% of children <6 years, was found to increase E. coli contamination on finished floors (p < 0.001) or earthen ground surfaces (p = 0.008) after feces were removed, even if paper was laid down prior to defecation. Use of unsafe tools (e.g., paper, plastic bag, straw/hay) to pick up child feces increased E. coli contamination on caregiver hands after feces handling (p < 0.0001), whereas the use of safe tools (e.g., potty, hoe, scoop) did not increase hand contamination. Points of contamination from cleaning CFM hardware and anal cleansing were also identified. The most common disposal location for feces of children <6 years was to throw feces into an open field (41.6%), with only 32.3% disposed in a latrine. Several households owned scoops or potties, but use was low and we identified shortcomings of these CFM tools and proposed alternative interventions that may be more effective. Overall, our results demonstrate the need for CFM interventions that move beyond focusing solely on feces disposal to address CFM as a holistic set of practices. Display omitted •Sampling at the time and place of child defecation measured fecal contamination from CFM practices.•Current CFM practices were found to increase fecal contamination in the environment and on hands.•CFM hardware of potties and scoops can reduce fecal contamination, but had low use and shortcomings.•CFM interventions must address CFM as a holistic set of many practices beyond only feces disposal.