E-viri
Recenzirano
Odprti dostop
-
Current Results of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement: Insights From the German Aortic Valve RegistryHolzhey, David, MD, PhD; Mohr, Friedrich W., MD, PhD; Walther, Thomas, MD, PhD; Möllmann, Helge, MD, PhD; Beckmann, Andreas, MD, PhD; Kötting, Joachim, MS; Figulla, Hans Reiner, MD, PhD; Cremer, Jochen, MD, PhD; Kuck, Karl-Heinz, MD, PhD; Lange, Rüdiger, MD, PhD; Sack, Stefan, MD, PhD; Schuler, Gerhard, MD, PhD; Beyersdorf, Friedhelm, MD, PhD; Böhm, Michael, MD, PhD; Heusch, Gerd, MD, PhD; Meinertz, Thomas, MD, PhD; Neumann, Till, MD, PhD; Papoutsis, Konstantinos, MD, PhD; Schneider, Steffen, PhD; Welz, Armin, MD, PhD; Hamm, Christian W., MD, PhD
The Annals of thoracic surgery, 02/2016, Letnik: 101, Številka: 2Journal Article
Background Conventional aortic valve replacement (AVR) remains the therapy of choice for many patients with severe aortic valve disease. The unique German Aortic Valve Registry (GARY) allows the comparison of contemporary outcomes of AVR with those of transcatheter AVRs. We report here real-world, all-comers outcomes of AVR, including combined AVR and coronary bypass grafting (AVR+CABG). Methods A total of 34,063 patients who received AVR (22,107 patients, 39% female; mean age 68.0 ± 11.3 years, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, 8.6%) or AVR+CABG (11,956 patients, 28% female; mean age 72.6 ± 7.8 years, mean logistic European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation, 10.7%) between 2011 and 2013 were analyzed and followed up to assess the 1-year outcome. Results In-hospital mortality was 2.3% for AVR and 4.1% for AVR+CABG. Other important outcome variables include stroke (AVR, 1.2%; AVR+CABG, 1.9%) and new pacemaker implantation (AVR, 4.4%; AVR+CABG, 3.6%). Survival at 1 year was 93.2% for AVR and 89.4% for AVR+CABG. Total stroke rates at 1 year were 1.6% for AVR and 2.0% AVR+CABG. Quality of life assessment indicated that most patients were in New York Heart Association Functional Classification I or II (AVR, 86%; AVR+CABG, 84%) and that they were satisfied with the overall postoperative course (AVR, 88%; AVR+CABG, 87%). Conclusions Contemporary surgical AVR yields excellent outcomes with low in-hospital mortality, a low overall complication rate, and good 1-year outcome for all risk groups. Accordingly, conventional AVR remains an important therapeutic option for many patients.
Avtor
![loading ... loading ...](themes/default/img/ajax-loading.gif)
Vnos na polico
Trajna povezava
- URL:
Faktor vpliva
Dostop do baze podatkov JCR je dovoljen samo uporabnikom iz Slovenije. Vaš trenutni IP-naslov ni na seznamu dovoljenih za dostop, zato je potrebna avtentikacija z ustreznim računom AAI.
Leto | Faktor vpliva | Izdaja | Kategorija | Razvrstitev | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP | JCR | SNIP |
Baze podatkov, v katerih je revija indeksirana
Ime baze podatkov | Področje | Leto |
---|
Povezave do osebnih bibliografij avtorjev | Povezave do podatkov o raziskovalcih v sistemu SICRIS |
---|
Vir: Osebne bibliografije
in: SICRIS
To gradivo vam je dostopno v celotnem besedilu. Če kljub temu želite naročiti gradivo, kliknite gumb Nadaljuj.