Capecitabine is an oral cytotoxic chemotherapeutic commonly used across cancer subtypes. As with other oral medications though, it may suffer from drug interactions that could impair its absorption.
...To determine if gastric acid suppressants such as proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may impair capecitabine efficacy.
This secondary analysis of TRIO-013, a phase III randomized trial, compares capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CapeOx) with or without lapatinib in 545 patients with ERBB2/HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal cancer (GEC); patients were randomized 1:1 between CapeOx with or without lapatinib. Proton pump inhibitor use was identified by medication records. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Specific subgroups were accounted for, such as younger age (<60 years), Asian ethnicity, female sex, and disease stage (metastatic/advanced) in multivariate Cox proportional hazards modeling. The TRIO-013 trial accrued and randomized patients between June 2008 and January 2012; this analysis took place in January 2014.
Patients were divided based on PPI exposure.
Primary study outcome was PFS and OS between patients treated with PPIs vs patients who were not. Secondary outcomes included disease response rates and toxicities.
Of the 545 patients with GEC (median age, 60 years; 406 men 74%) included in the study, 229 received PPIs (42.0%) and were evenly distributed between arms. In the placebo arm, PPI-treated patients had poorer median PFS, 4.2 vs 5.7 months (hazard ratio HR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.29-1.81, P < .001); OS, 9.2 vs 11.3 months (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.06-1.62; P = .04); and disease control rate (83% vs 72%; P = .02) vs patients not treated with PPIs. In multivariate analysis considering age, race, disease stage, and sex, PPI-treated patients had poorer PFS (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.42-1.94; P < .001) and OS (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.11-1.71; P = .001). In patients treated with CapeOx and lapatinib, PPIs had less effect on PFS (HR, 1.08; P = .54) and OS (HR, 1.26; P = .10); however, multivariate analysis in this group demonstrated a significant difference in OS (HR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.06-1.66; P = .03).
Proton pump inhibitors negatively effected capecitabine efficacy by possibly raising gastric pH levels, leading to altered dissolution and absorption. These results are consistent with previous erlotinib and sunitinib studies. Whether PPIs affected lapatinib is unclear given concurrent capecitabine. Given capecitabine's prevalence in treatment breast cancer and colon cancer, further studies are under way.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00680901.
To evaluate feasible doses of weekly everolimus and irinotecan given with cetuximab for previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC).
Adults with mCRC that progressed after 5-fluorouracil ...or capecitabine-plus-oxaliplatin were treated using a sequential dose escalation scheme. Dosing decisions were based on the probability of experiencing a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during the first two 21-day treatment cycles.
Patients received everolimus 30 mg/week plus irinotecan 350 mg/m2 q3w (n=5; dose A1) or everolimus 30 mg/week plus irinotecan 250 mg/m2 q3w (n=14; dose B1). Among patients evaluable for the maximum tolerated dose, two out of four in A1 and one out of eight in B1 experienced four DLTs. The trial was terminated early based on changes in clinical practice and emerging data on everolimus dosing.
The feasible doses of everolimus and irinotecan administered with cetuximab as second-line therapy in mCRC were 30 mg/week and 250 mg/m2, respectively.
BackgroundSolid tumors comprise >90% of cancers. Metastatic colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and pancreatic cancer are among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality (5-year ...overall survival: 14%, 6%, and 3%, respectively).1Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy demonstrated clinical outcomes in hematologic malignancies.2 3 However, translating engineered T-cell therapies to solid tumors proves difficult due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer cells from normal cells. In previous studies, the use of a carcinoembryonic antigen T-cell receptors and mesothelin CARs both resulted in dose-limiting on-target, off-tumor toxicities.4 5 TmodTM CAR T-cell therapy addresses these challenges by leveraging dual receptors to create a robust AND NOT signal integrator capable of killing tumor cells, while leaving healthy cells intact (figure 1).6 Tmod platform technology is a versatile system that may be applied to T cells and natural killer cells in autologous and allogeneic settings.HLA LOH offers a definitive tumor versus normal discriminator target for CAR T-cell therapy.6 7 The 2 receptors comprise an activator that recognizes an antigen present on the surface of normal and tumor cells and a blocker that recognizes a second surface antigen from an allele lost only in tumor cells. HLA LOH has been observed in ~13% across all solid tumors and up to 33% of pancreatic cancers.8 New technologies have shown higher HLA LOH rates; however, it is unclear whether patients with HLA LOH in their primary tumor tissues are at higher risk for recurrence. BASECAMP-1 is an observational study with key objectives: 1) To determine and identify patients with somatic HLA LOH eligible for Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, and 2) Subsequent leukapheresis and manufacturing feasibility for future Tmod CAR T-cell trials.MethodsBASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) patient eligibility has 2 parts (figure 2): 1) Patients will be initially screened to identify germline HLA-A*02 heterozygosity by central next-generation sequencing (NGS). If HLA-A*02 heterozygosity is confirmed, primary archival tumor tissue will be analyzed by xT-Onco NGS testing9 to determine if somatic tumor HLA-A*02 LOH is present; 2) If the tumor demonstrates HLA-A*02 LOH and the patient screens eligible, the patient will undergo leukapheresis. Patients enrolled in the study who undergo leukapheresis will be evaluated for safety 7 days post-leukapheresis and followed for relapsed status. Banked T cells will be available for subsequent autologous Tmod CAR T-cell therapy at the time of relapse.Abstract 491 Figure 1Illustration of the Tmod T cell engaging with tumor cells with somatic loss of HLA-A*02 and with normal cellsAbstract 491 Figure 2Study schema. HLA, human leukocyte antigen; LOH, loss of heterozygosity; NGS, next generation sequencingTrial RegistrationNCT04981119ReferencesAmerican Cancer Society. Cancer Facts & Figures 2021. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2021.Neelapu S, Locke F, Bartlett N, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel CAR T-cell therapy in refractory large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med 2017;377(26):2531–2544.Maude S, Laetsch T, Buechner J, et al. Tisagenlecleucel in children and young adults with B-cell lymphoblastic leukemia. N Engl J Med 2018;378(5):439–448.Parkhurst M, Yang J, Langan R, et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol Ther 2011;19(3):620–626.Haas AR, Tanyi JL, O’Hara MH, et al. Phase I study of lentiviral-transduced chimeric antigen receptor-modified T cells recognizing mesothelin in advanced solid cancers. Mol Ther. 2019;27(11):1919–1929.Hamburger A, DiAndreth B, Cui J, et al. Engineered T cells directed at tumors with defined allelic loss. Mol Immunol 2020;128:298–310.Hwang M, Mog B, Douglass J, et al. Targeting loss of heterozygosity for cancer-specific immunotherapy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021;118(12):e2022410118.The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) Research Network. https://www.cancer.gov/tcga. Accessed June 2021.Perera J, Mapes B, Lau D, et al. Detection of human leukocyte antigen class I loss of heterozygosity in solid tumor types by next-generation DNA sequencing. J Immunother Cancer 2019;7(suppl 1):103.
BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has demonstrated clinical efficacy in hematologic malignancies1; however, implementation of these therapies in solid tumors has been ...challenging due to a lack of tumor-specific targets that discriminate cancer from normal cells. Previous studies using carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T-cell receptors and T-cell engagers have resulted in dose-limiting, on-target, off-tumor toxicities.2 3 EVEREST-1 (NCT05736731) is a seamless, phase 1/2, open-label, nonrandomized study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A2B530, a logic-gated CEA-targeting Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, in adult patients. Tmod CAR T-cell therapy addresses challenges of on-target, off-tumor toxicity by combining a CAR-activating receptor with a blocking receptor to discriminate tumor from normal cells (figure 1).4 5 The activator receptor recognizes CEA on the surface of both tumor and normal cells. CEA is normally widely expressed in epithelial cells, particularly of the gastrointestinal (GI) system and can be upregulated in GI and lung tumors. Specificity for tumor cells is provided by a blocker that recognizes human leukocyte antigen (HLA) A*02, which is absent on tumor cells with HLA-A*02 LOH.6 LOH for HLA-A*02 is observed in solid tumor malignancies and can be detected using the Tempus next-generation sequencing testing. With this definitive discriminator target, A2B530 can potentially provide a therapeutic window to treat patients with CEA-expressing solid tumors exhibiting HLA LOH.MethodsPatients are enrolled through BASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119), a master prescreening study that identifies patients with HLA LOH at any time in the course of their disease. BASECAMP-1 eligible patients undergo leukapheresis and, when clinically appropriate, their banked T cells are manufactured for the EVEREST-1 study (figure 2). The key inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed recurrent, unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic cancers that are associated with CEA expression: non-small cell lung (NSCLC), colorectal (CRC), or pancreatic (PANC) cancers. Patients should have received ≥1 line of prior therapy (eg, checkpoint inhibitor, molecular-targeted, or chemotherapy). The primary objective of phase 1 is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of A2B530 in patients with NSCLC, CRC, and PANC, and to identify the maximum tolerated dose and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). The dose-expansion phase will confirm RP2D and collect biomarker data to further characterize A2B530.Trial RegistrationNCT05736731References1. Locke FL, Miklos DB, Jacobson CA, et al. Axicabtagene ciloleucel as second-line therapy for large B-cell lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022;386:640–654.2. Parkhurst MR, Yang JC, Langan RC, et al. T cells targeting carcinoembryonic antigen can mediate regression of metastatic colorectal cancer but induce severe transient colitis. Mol Ther. 2011;19:620–626.3. Tabernero JT, Melero I, Ros W, et al. Phase Ia and Ib studies of the novel carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) T-cell bispecific (CEA CD3 TCB) antibody as a single agent and in combination with atezolizumab: Preliminary efficacy and safety in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). J Clin Oncol. 2017;35(15_Suppl):3002.4. Hamburger AE, DiAndreth B, Cui J, et al. Engineered T cells directed at tumors with defined allelic loss. Mol Immunol. 2020;128:298–310.5. DiAndreth B, Hamburger A, Xu H, Kamb A. The Tmod cellular logic gate as a solution for tumor-selective immunotherapy. Clin Immunol. 2022;241:109030.6. Sandberg ML, Wang X, Martin AD, et al. A carcinoembryonic antigen-specific cell therapy selectively targets tumor cells with HLA loss of heterozygosity in vitro and in vivo. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14:eabm0306.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by site IRBs.Abstract 634 Figure 1CEA CAR Tmod Single Vector ConstructAbstract 634 Figure 2Everest-1 Study Design
BackgroundChimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has been challenging in solid tumors due to an absence of tumor-specific targets and the resultant on-target, off-tumor toxicity. Tmod, a ...novel logic-gated CAR T-cell therapy, utilizes a blocking receptor to discriminate tumor from normal cells, thus mitigating on-target, off-tumor toxicity (figure 1).1 2 The blocker recognizes human leukocyte antigen (HLA), an antigen that is subject to LOH.3 4 Among advanced colorectal, pancreatic, and non-small cell lung cancers, HLA LOH occurs in 15.6%, 19.6%, and 23.1% of patients, respectively (Tempus Database).5 However, HLA LOH can only be therapeutically exploited if patients are identifiable through a feasible clinical workflow.BASECAMP-1 is an ongoing prescreening study to: 1) Identify patients with tumor-associated HLA LOH and eligible for Tmod CAR T-cell therapy, and 2) Obtain leukapheresis in preparation for the autologous CAR T-cell therapy trials EVEREST-1 (A2B530 targeting carcinoembryonic antigen; NCT05736731) and EVEREST-2 (A2B694 targeting mesothelin).MethodsBASECAMP-1 (NCT04981119) eligibility has 2 parts (figure 2). Patients with metastatic solid tumors or at high risk of relapse will be screened for germline HLA-A*02. Tumor tissue from patients with germline HLA-A*02:01 heterozygosity will be analyzed for somatic tumor HLA-A*02:01 LOH via Tempus next-generation sequencing testing. In addition, patients may be identified via the Tempus AWARE program. AWARE analyzes tissue from patients submitted to Tempus as part of the patient’s routine clinical workup. Institutional investigators are then informed of molecular results and can communicate with treating physicians regarding enrollment opportunities. Patients with tumors demonstrating HLA-A*02 LOH may be screened for subsequent leukapheresis, and banked T cells will be available for the EVEREST-1 and EVEREST-2 studies.ResultsAs of June 1, 2023, 664 patients were consented at 9 institutions (figure 3). HLA status was determined for 584 patients; 234 were identified as HLA-A*02:01 heterozygous (40%). LOH results were available for 117 patients; 13 were LOH positive (11%).In addition, the AWARE program has been deployed since January 2022. We have identified 52 patients across sites with study-specific disease types with HLA-A*02:01 LOH; of these, 13 are currently being screened, 23 have been found ineligible, and 16 have consented. This demonstrated the feasibility of leveraging a diagnostic during routine clinical workup to identify rare, molecularly defined patients for personalized clinical studies.Trial RegistrationNCT04981119Please note, this trial is a screening/non-interventional clinical trial.References1. Hamburger AE, DiAndreth B, Cui J, et al. Engineered T cells directed at tumors with defined allelic loss. Mol Immunol. 2020;128:298-2. DiAndreth B, Hamburger A, Xu H, Kamb A. The Tmod cellular logic gate as a solution for tumor-selective immunotherapy. Clin Immunol. 2022;241:109030.3. Sandberg ML, Wang X, Martin AD, et al. A carcinoembryonic antigen-specific cell therapy selectively targets tumor cells with HLA loss of heterozygosity in vitro and in vivo. Sci Transl Med. 2022;14:eabm0306.4. Tokatlian T, Asuelime GE, Mock J-Y, et al. Mesothelin-specific CAR-T cell therapy that incorporates an HLA-gated safety mechanism selectively kills tumor cells. J Immunother Cancer. 2022;10:e003826.5. Simeone DM, Hecht R, Patel SP, et al. BASECAMP-1: Leveraging human leukocyte antigen (HLA) loss of heterozygosity (LOH) in solid tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS) to identify patients with relapsed solid tumor for future logic-gated Tmod CAR T-cell therapy. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(16_Suppl):TPS2676.Ethics ApprovalThis study was approved by site IRBsAbstract 636 Figure 1Logic-gated CAR T with the goal to reduce toxicity: CEA and MSLN (activators) and HLA-A*02 (blocker)Abstract 636 Figure 2Study Schema for BASECAMP-1Abstract 636 Figure 3BASECAMP-1 Progress to Date and Screening Process Details (June 1, 2023)
Abstract Background Identifying predictive biomarkers is important to optimally treat patients. This analysis evaluated the association of K- ras , BRAF , and PIK3CA gene mutations with tumor ...resistance to panitumumab alone. Patients and Methods From 3 phase II panitumumab metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) studies, 62 of 533 patient samples were available. Mutations were identified from genomic DNA by sequencing. Results Of the 62 samples, 24 (38.7%) harbored a K- ras mutation, and 38 (61.3%) were wild type. In the wild-type K- ras group, 11% of patients had a partial response (PR), 53% had stable disease (SD), and 37% had progressive disease (PD). In the mutant K- ras group, 21% of patients had SD, and 79% of patients had PD; there were no responses. The absence of a K- ras mutation was associated with response to panitumumab (PR vs. SD vs. PD; P = .0028). The hazard ratio for wild-type versus mutant K- ras was 0.4 (95% CI, 0.2-0.7) for progression-free survival and 0.5 (95% CI, 0.3-0.9) for overall survival. Four patients had a V600E BRAF mutation, and 2 patients had a PIK3CA mutation. Conclusion These data suggest that patients with mCRC with activating K- ras mutations are less likely to respond to panitumumab alone. The small sample size limits us from defining a predictive role of PIK3CA and BRAF mutations for panitumumab treatment.
The results of clinical trials that led to modern first- and second-line chemotherapeutic regimens for metastatic colorectal cancer, including studies of recently introduced monoclonal antibody ...products that target vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), are described, as well as new therapeutic targets being studied and challenges in research to identify and evaluate new therapies.
Modern chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer contain fluorouracil, leucovorin, either oxaliplatin or irinotecan, and the VEGF inhibitor bevacizumab. The EGFR inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab currently are reserved for second- or third-line therapy, but their role could change as the results of clinical research become available. The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin pathway, src kinases, and insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor are among the targets of current research. Identifying the subset of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who stand to benefit from a particular therapy presents a challenge in conducting clinical research.
Modern chemotherapeutic and monoclonal antibody regimens have improved survival in patients with meta-static colorectal cancer. The optimal combinations, timing, and sequence of agents remain to be determined.
Background:
Benchmarking international cancer survival differences is necessary to evaluate and improve healthcare systems. Our aim was to assess the potential regional differences in outcomes among ...patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) participating in international randomized clinical trials (RCTs).
Design:
Countries were grouped into 11 regions according to the World Health Organization and the EUROCARE model. Meta-analyses based on individual patient data were used to synthesize data across studies and regions and to conduct comparisons for outcomes in a two-stage random-effects model after adjusting for age, sex, performance status, and time period. We used mCRC patients enrolled in the first-line RCTs from the ARCAD database, which provided enrolling country information. There were 21,509 patients in 27 RCTs included across the 11 regions.
Results:
Main outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Compared with other regions, patients from the United Kingdom (UK) and Ireland were proportionaly over-represented, older, with higher performance status, more frequently male, and more commonly not treated with biological therapies. Cohorts from central Europe and the United States (USA) had significantly longer OS compared with those from UK and Ireland (p = 0.0034 and p < 0.001, respectively), with median difference of 3–4 months. The survival deficits in the UK and Ireland cohorts were, at most, 15% at 1 year. No evidence of a regional disparity was observed for PFS. Among those treated without biological therapies, patients from the UK and Ireland had shorter OS than central Europe patients (p < 0.001).
Conclusions:
Significant international disparities in the OS of cohorts of mCRC patients enrolled in RCTs were found. Survival of mCRC patients included in RCTs was consistently lower in the UK and Ireland regions than in central Europe, southern Europe, and the USA, potentially attributed to greater overall population representation, delayed diagnosis, and reduced availability of therapies.
PDF
