Fluorine-18 flurpiridaz is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging tracer.
This study sought to assess the diagnostic efficacy of flurpiridaz PET versus ...technetium-99m–labeled single photon emission computed tomography SPECT for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD), defined as ≥50% stenosis by quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA). Flurpiridaz safety was also evaluated.
In this phase III prospective multicenter clinical study, 795 patients with known or suspected CAD from 72 clinical sites in the United States, Canada, and Finland were enrolled. A total of 755 patients were evaluable, and the mean age was 62.3 ± 9.5 years, 31% were women, 55% had body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and 71% had pharmacological stress. Patients underwent 1-day rest-stress (pharmacological or exercise) flurpiridaz PET and 1- or 2-day rest-stress Tc-99m–labeled SPECT and ICA. Images were read by 3 experts blinded to clinical and ICA data.
Sensitivity of flurpiridaz PET (for detection of ≥50% stenosis by ICA) was 71.9% (95% confidence interval CI: 67.0% to 76.3%), significantly (p < 0.001) higher than SPECT (53.7% 95% CI: 48.5% to 58.8%), while specificity did not meet the prespecified noninferiority criterion (76.2% 95% CI: 71.8% to 80.1% vs. 86.6% 95% CI: 83.2% to 89.8%; p = NS). Receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis demonstrated superior discrimination of CAD by flurpiridaz PET versus SPECT in the overall population, in women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing (p < 0.001 for all). Flurpiridaz PET was superior to SPECT for defect size (p < 0.001), image quality (p < 0.001), diagnostic certainty (p < 0.001), and radiation exposure (6.1 ± 0.4 mSv vs. 13.4 ± 3.2 mSv; p < 0.001). Flurpiridaz PET was safe and well tolerated.
Flurpiridaz PET myocardial perfusion imaging shows promise as a new tracer for CAD detection and assessment of women, obese patients, and patients undergoing pharmacological stress testing. A second phase III Food and Drug Administration trial is ongoing. (A Phase 3 Multi-center Study to Assess PET Imaging of Flurpiridaz F 18 Injection in Patients with CAD; NCT01347710)
Display omitted
Flurpiridaz F-18 (flurpiridaz) is a novel positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging tracer.
The purpose of this study was to further assess the diagnostic efficacy and safety of ...flurpiridaz for the detection and evaluation of coronary artery disease (CAD) defined as ≥50% stenosis by quantitative invasive coronary angiography (ICA).
In this second phase 3 prospective multicenter clinical study, 730 patients with suspected CAD from 48 clinical sites in the United States, Canada, and Europe were enrolled. Patients underwent 1-day rest/stress flurpiridaz PET and 1- or 2-day rest-stress Tc-99m–labeled single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) before ICA. PET and SPECT images were read by 3 experts blinded to clinical and ICA data.
A total of 578 patients (age 63.7 ± 9.5 years) were evaluable; 32.5% were women, 52.3% had body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and 33.6% had diabetes. Flurpiridaz PET met the efficacy endpoints of the study; its sensitivity and specificity were significantly higher than the prespecified threshold value by 2 of the 3 readers. The sensitivity of flurpiridaz PET was higher than SPECT (80.3% vs 68.7%; P = 0.0003) and its specificity was noninferior to SPECT (63.8% vs 61.7%; P = 0.0004). PET area under the receiver-operating characteristic curves were higher than SPECT in the overall population (0.80 vs 0.68; P < 0.001), women, and obese patients (P < 0.001 for both). Flurpiridaz PET was superior to SPECT (P < 0.001) for perfusion defect size/severity evaluation, image quality, diagnostic certainty, and radiation exposure. Flurpiridaz PET was safe and well tolerated.
This second flurpiridaz PET myocardial perfusion imaging trial shows that flurpiridaz has utility as a new tracer for CAD detection, specifically in women and obese patients. (An International Study to Evaluate Diagnostic Efficacy of Flurpiridaz 18F Injection PET MPI in the Detection of Coronary Artery Disease CAD; NCT03354273)
Display omitted
Repeated administration of cisplatin causes CKD. In previous studies, we reported that the kidney-secreted survival protein renalase (RNLS) and an agonist peptide protected mice from ...cisplatin-induced AKI.
To investigate whether kidney-targeted delivery of RNLS might prevent cisplatin-induced CKD in a mouse model, we achieved specific delivery of a RNLS agonist peptide (RP81) to the renal proximal tubule by encapsulating the peptide in mesoscale nanoparticles (MNPs). We used genetic deletion of RNLS, single-cell RNA sequencing analysis, and Western blotting to determine efficacy and to explore underlying mechanisms. We also measured plasma RNLS in patients with advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving their first dose of cisplatin chemotherapy.
In mice with CKD induced by cisplatin, we observed an approximate 60% reduction of kidney RNLS; genetic deletion of RNLS was associated with significantly more severe cisplatin-induced CKD. In this severe model of cisplatin-induced CKD, systemic administration of MNP-encapsulated RP81 (RP81-MNP) significantly reduced CKD as assessed by plasma creatinine and histology. It also decreased inflammatory cytokines in plasma and inhibited regulated necrosis in kidney. Single-cell RNA sequencing analyses revealed that RP81-MNP preserved epithelial components of the nephron and the vasculature and suppressed inflammatory macrophages and myofibroblasts. In patients receiving their first dose of cisplatin chemotherapy, plasma RNLS levels trended lower at day 14 post-treatment.
Kidney-targeted delivery of RNLS agonist RP81-MNP protects against cisplatin-induced CKD by decreasing cell death and improving the viability of the renal proximal tubule. These findings suggest that such an approach might mitigate the development of CKD in patients receiving cisplatin cancer chemotherapy.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in patients with type 2 diabetes. But the utility of screening patients with type 2 diabetes for asymptomatic CAD is ...controversial.
To assess whether routine screening for CAD identifies patients with type 2 diabetes as being at high cardiac risk and whether it affects their cardiac outcomes.
The Detection of Ischemia in Asymptomatic Diabetics (DIAD) study is a randomized controlled trial in which 1123 participants with type 2 diabetes and no symptoms of CAD were randomly assigned to be screened with adenosine-stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) or not to be screened. Participants were recruited from diabetes clinics and practices and prospectively followed up from August 2000 to September 2007.
Cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI).
The cumulative cardiac event rate was 2.9% over a mean (SD) follow-up of 4.8 (0.9) years for an average of 0.6% per year. Seven nonfatal MIs and 8 cardiac deaths (2.7%) occurred among the screened group and 10 nonfatal MIs and 7 cardiac deaths (3.0%) among the not-screened group (hazard ratio HR, 0.88; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.44-1.88; P = .73). Of those in the screened group, 409 participants with normal results and 50 with small MPI defects had lower event rates than the 33 with moderate or large MPI defects; 0.4% per year vs 2.4% per year (HR, 6.3; 95% CI, 1.9-20.1; P = .001). Nevertheless, the positive predictive value of having moderate or large MPI defects was only 12%. The overall rate of coronary revascularization was low in both groups: 31 (5.5%) in the screened group and 44 (7.8%) in the unscreened group (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.1; P = .14). During the course of study there was a significant and equivalent increase in primary medical prevention in both groups.
In this contemporary study population of patients with diabetes, the cardiac event rates were low and were not significantly reduced by MPI screening for myocardial ischemia over 4.8 years.
clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00769275.
Positron emission tomography (PET) myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) offers technical benefits compared with single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI, but there has been no systematic ...comparison of their diagnostic accuracy for coronary artery disease. We performed a bivariate meta-analysis of the published literature to compare the sensitivity and specificity of PET versus SPECT stress MPI for ≥50% stenosis of any epicardial coronary artery in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE from inception through January 2012 and the references of identified studies for prospective, English language studies that evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of PET and/or SPECT MPI with coronary angiography as the reference standard and reported sufficient data to calculate patient-level true and false positives and negatives. Two investigators independently extracted patient and study characteristics; a third investigator resolved any disagreements. We identified 117 studies, including 108 evaluating SPECT MPI, 4 evaluating PET MPI, and 5 evaluating both modalities. Bivariate meta-analysis demonstrated a significantly higher pooled mean sensitivity with PET (92.6% 95% Confidence Interval, 88.3% to 95.5%) compared with SPECT (88.3% 95% confidence interval, 86.4% to 90.0%) (P=0.035). No significant difference in specificity was observed between PET (81.3% 95% confidence interval, 66.6% to 90.4%) and SPECT (75.8% 95% confidence interval, 72.1% to 79.1%) (P=0.39). Few studies investigated coronary angiography with PET. Only 5 studies directly compared SPECT and PET.
In a meta-analysis of 11,862 patients, PET MPI demonstrated a higher sensitivity for coronary artery disease than SPECT MPI. No difference in specificity was detected in the pooled analysis of PET and SPECT MPI.
PDF
