The novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has unfolded with remarkable speed, posing unprecedented challenges for health care systems and society. Otolaryngologists have a special role ...in responding to this crisis by virtue of expertise in airway management. Against the backdrop of nations struggling to contain the virus's spread and to manage hospital strain, otolaryngologists must partner with anesthesiologists and front-line health care teams to provide expert services in high-risk situations while reducing transmission. Airway management and airway endoscopy, whether awake or sedated, expose operators to infectious aerosols, posing risks to staff. This commentary provides background on the outbreak, highlights critical considerations around mitigating infectious aerosol contact, and outlines best practices for airway-related clinical decision making during the COVID-19 pandemic. What otolaryngologists need to know and what actions are required are considered alongside the implications of increasing demand for tracheostomy. Approaches to managing the airway are presented, emphasizing safety of patients and the health care team.
Speech-language pathologists (SLPs) and laryngologists often work closely in interdisciplinary settings evaluating and treating patients with voice, swallowing, and airway disorders. This ...collaboration is integral to providing optimum patient care. We theorize that trust is an essential component of this relationship and contributes to effective patient care and professional satisfaction. There is currently no literature that explores the development and role of trust in this unique interprofessional relationship. We aim to explore the SLP and laryngologist interprofessional relationship and the development and role of trust in that relationship.
Qualitative Realist Thematic Analysis.
Thematic analysis of semistructured qualitative interviews was performed to explore the relationship between SLPs and laryngologists. Through purposive sampling from November 2022–January 2023, we recruited SLPs (n = 10) and laryngologists (n = 10) from 12 centers with varying years of practice, practice setting (academic or private), geographic location, and team structures.
Trust between SLPs and laryngologists is comprised of confidence in (1) ability (clinical judgment, technical skill), (2) benevolence, and (3) integrity. Trust formation is enhanced by frequency and quality of communication, physical proximity, and reduction of practical barriers (scheduling, billing, departmental structure). Role negotiation was not identified as a factor. The presence of all three components of trust contributes to job satisfaction, perceptions of patient experience and care outcomes, and the willingness to collaborate in academic areas beyond clinical care.
All three elements (ability, benevolence, integrity) must be present for trust in an interprofessional relationship between SLPs and laryngologists, and formation of trust is facilitated by robust communication, physical proximity, and reduction of practical barriers to collaboration. The lack of these elements and lack of trust between the two professions can negatively impact collaboration, job satisfaction, and patient care outcomes, contributing to inefficiencies in patient care.
The use of intralesional cidofovir injections for recurrent respiratory papillomatosis (RRP) remains controversial owing to concern regarding the risks of its use, including increased risk of ...dysplasia or carcinogenesis.
To describe the rates of dysplasia, development of malignant lesions, and adverse events associated with use of intralesional cidofovir injections as adjuvant treatment for RRP compared with patients treated without adjuvant cidofovir.
In this case series performed at a tertiary care referral center, review of electronic medical records on all adult and pediatric patients (N = 154) treated for RRP with adequate follow-up from January 1, 2000, to December 31, 2016, was performed. Data were collected on the use of cidofovir, development and presence of dysplasia or malignant lesions, complications, and intersurgical interval.
Adjuvant intralesional cidofovir or surgical excision only.
The main outcomes measured were the development of dysplasia, malignant lesions, and complications from treatment. These outcomes were determined before collection of data.
Of the 154 patients included in the analysis, 83 patients (53.9%) received adjuvant intralesional cidofovir and 71 patients (46.1%) underwent surgical excision only. One hundred patients (64.9%) were male; mean age was 27.7 (95% CI, 24.3-31.2) years. Patients were followed up for a median (interquartile range) of 70 (24-118) months in the noncidofovir group and 91 (47-152) months in the cidofovir group. There were no statistically significant differences in the rates of development of dysplasia (2.8%; 95% CI, -8.3% to 13.2%) or malignant lesions (2.2%; 95% CI, -5.3% to 11.2%) between the groups. No nephrotoxic effects were observed in the treated cohort, and only 5 minor complications that occurred in 628 injections were noted in the cidofovir group; 3 were related to direct laryngoscopy and 2 were related to needle malfunction.
In this cohort of patients with RRP, adjuvant intralesional cidofovir injections did not appear to cause major complications or an increased rate of development of dysplasia and cancer.
The COVID-19 pandemic has forced otolaryngologists and their patients to confront issues that they have rarely if ever previously faced. Prominent among these is the need to put the collective good ...ahead of the interests of individual patients with otolaryngologic disorders. We argue that the individual doctor-patient relationship remains paramount even at a time when public health principles mandate systems-level thinking.
Objective
Patients with COVID-19 are at risk for laryngeal injury and dysfunction secondary to respiratory failure, prolonged intubation, and other unique facets of this illness. Our goal is to ...report clinical features and treatment for patients presenting with voice, airway, and/or swallowing concerns postacute COVID-19.
Study Design
Case series.
Setting
Academic tertiary care center.
Methods
Patients presenting with laryngeal issues following recovery from COVID-19 were included after evaluation by our laryngology team. Data were collected via retrospective chart review from March 1, 2020, to April 1, 2021. This included details of the patient’s COVID-19 course, initial presentation to laryngology, and subsequent treatment.
Results
Twenty-four patients met inclusion criteria. Twenty (83%) patients were hospitalized, and 18 required endotracheal intubation for a median (range) duration of 14 days (6-31). Ten patients underwent tracheostomy. Patients were evaluated at a median 107 days (32-215) after their positive SARS-CoV-2 test result. The most common presenting concerns were dysphonia (n = 19, 79%), dyspnea (n = 17, 71%), and dysphagia (n = 6, 25%). Vocal fold motion impairment (50%), early glottic injury (39%), subglottic/tracheal stenosis (22%), and posterior glottic stenosis (17%) were identified in patients who required endotracheal intubation. Patients who did not need intubation were most frequently treated for muscle tension dysphonia (67%).
Conclusion
Patients may develop significant voice, airway, and/or swallowing issues postacute COVID-19. These complications are not limited to patients requiring intubation or tracheostomy. Multidisciplinary laryngology clinics will continue to play an integral role in diagnosing and treating patients with COVID-19–related laryngeal sequelae.
•The interpersonal connection formed with a surgeon is essential to trust; care paradigms should facilitate interpersonal connections.•Institutional and surgeon reputation, and observed surgeon ...collegial relationships influence trust formation.•Trust in a surgeon is perceived to have unique implications and importance, but trust overall operates similarly to other contexts.
Trust is crucial to the success of any personal or professional relationship. Literature on trust in the surgeon-patient relationship has been largely explored through quantitative methodologies, primarily examining why trust may or may not exist. We aimed to qualitatively elucidate the mechanisms of how trust develops between otolaryngologists and their patients.
Patients were recruited by surgery scheduling staff following an outpatient visit where a decision had been made to proceed with surgery at a tertiary academic medical center. We used qualitative realist thematic analysis of phone interviews to explore participants’ (n = 17) perceptions and conceptualization of trust formation within the surgeon-patient relationship.
Thematic analysis revealed three themes regarding trust formation in the surgeon-patient relationship: 1) Trust Across Various Contexts; 2) Impact of Prior Knowledge; and 3) Interpersonal Connection during the Clinical Encounter.
An interpersonal surgeon-patient connection is crucial to the formation of trust. Trust is also influenced by surgeon and institutional reputation and witnessed surgeon interactions with the healthcare team.
Patients perceive trust in a surgeon as carrying unique importance. To optimize conditions for trust development in this context, surgical care paradigms should promote meaningful preoperative interpersonal surgeon-patient relationships and positive surgeon and institutional reputations.
The intricate anatomy and physiology of cranial nerves have inspired clinicians and scientists to study their roles in the nervous system. Damage to motor cranial nerves may result from a variety of ...organic or iatrogenic insults and causes devastating functional impairment and disfigurement. Surgical innovations directed towards restoring function to injured motor cranial nerves and their associated organs have evolved to include nerve repair, grafting, substitution, and muscle transposition. In parallel with this progress, research on tissue-engineered constructs, development of bioelectrical interfaces, and modulation of the regenerative milieu through cellular, immunomodulatory, or neurotrophic mechanisms has proliferated to enhance the available repertoire of clinically applicable reconstructive options. Despite these advances, patients continue to suffer from functional limitations relating to inadequate cranial nerve regeneration, aberrant reinnervation, or incomplete recovery of neuromuscular function. These shortfalls have profound quality of life ramifications and provide an impetus to further elucidate mechanisms underlying cranial nerve denervation and to improve repair. In this review, we summarize the literature on reconstruction and regeneration of motor cranial nerves following various injury patterns. We focus on seven cranial nerves with predominantly efferent functions and highlight shared patterns of injuries and clinical manifestations. We also present an overview of the existing reconstructive approaches, from facial reanimation, laryngeal reinnervation, to variations of interposition nerve grafts for reconstruction. We discuss ongoing endeavors to promote nerve regeneration and to suppress aberrant reinnervation and the development of synkinesis. Insights from these studies will shed light on recent progress and new horizons in understanding the biomechanics of peripheral nerve neurobiology, with emphasis on promising strategies for optimizing neural regeneration and identifying future directions in the field of motor cranial neuron research.
Summary Objectives The Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) measure is a well-established disease-specific quality of life instrument for voice disorders. This study aims to establish a large, ...heterogenous V-RQOL normative database. Methods The V-RQOL measure was completed by adult volunteers with no voice complaints in the preceding 6 months. Standardized scores were calculated. Mean scores and standard deviations (SDs) were calculated by demographic category and analyzed using a one-way analysis of variance test. Results Results were available for 253 responders with a mean V-RQOL score of 94.8 (SD 10.1). There was no difference in scores among age groups, gender, or employment status. Conclusions This study provides normative values for the V-RQOL measure. Clinicians using this instrument for clinical or research purposes may use this database for a more complete understanding and interpretation of their results.
A significant change for patients and families during SARs-CoV-2 has been the restriction of visitors for hospitalized patients. We analyzed SARs-CoV-2 hospital visitation policies and found ...widespread variation in both development and content. This variation has the potential to engender inequity in access. We propose guidance for hospital visitation policies for this pandemic to protect, respect, and support patients, visitors, clinicians, and communities.
PDF
