Patients who have residual invasive carcinoma after the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer have poor prognoses. The benefit ...of adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients remains unclear.
We randomly assigned 910 patients with HER2-negative residual invasive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (containing anthracycline, taxane, or both) to receive standard postsurgical treatment either with capecitabine or without (control). The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival.
The result of the prespecified interim analysis met the primary end point, so this trial was terminated early. The final analysis showed that disease-free survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (74.1% vs. 67.6% of the patients were alive and free from recurrence or second cancer at 5 years; hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.70; 95% confidence interval CI, 0.53 to 0.92; P=0.01). Overall survival was longer in the capecitabine group than in the control group (89.2% vs. 83.6% of the patients were alive at 5 years; hazard ratio for death, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.90; P=0.01). Among patients with triple-negative disease, the rate of disease-free survival was 69.8% in the capecitabine group versus 56.1% in the control group (hazard ratio for recurrence, second cancer, or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.87), and the overall survival rate was 78.8% versus 70.3% (hazard ratio for death, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.30 to 0.90). The hand-foot syndrome, the most common adverse reaction to capecitabine, occurred in 73.4% of the patients in the capecitabine group.
After standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy containing anthracycline, taxane, or both, the addition of adjuvant capecitabine therapy was safe and effective in prolonging disease-free survival and overall survival among patients with HER2-negative breast cancer who had residual invasive disease on pathological testing. (Funded by the Advanced Clinical Research Organization and the Japan Breast Cancer Research Group; CREATE-X UMIN Clinical Trials Registry number, UMIN000000843 .).
Endocrine treatment is recommended by clinical guidelines as the preferred treatment option for premenopausal as well as postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic ...breast cancer. In real-world clinical practice, however, a substantial number of patients are treated with chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the clinical antitumour activity and safety of palbociclib plus endocrine therapy with that of capecitabine chemotherapy in premenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.
This multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 2 study was done in 14 academic institutions in South Korea. Premenopausal women aged 19 years or older with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer that had relapsed or progressed during previous tamoxifen therapy and with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0–2 were included. One line of previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was allowed. Patients were randomly assigned, using a random permuted block design (with a block size of two), to receive palbociclib plus combination endocrine therapy (oral exemestane 25 mg per day for 28 days and oral palbociclib 125 mg per day for 21 days every 4 weeks plus leuprolide 3·75 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks) or chemotherapy (oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 twice daily for 2 weeks every 3 weeks). Randomisation was stratified by previous chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer and visceral metastasis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. All analyses were done in a modified intention-to-treat population that excluded patients who did not receive study medication. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02592746, and is ongoing for follow-up of overall survival.
Between June 15, 2016, and Dec 10, 2018, 189 patients were enrolled, of whom 184 were randomly assigned to the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group (n=92) or the capecitabine group (n=92). Six patients in the capecitabine group withdrew from the study before drug administration; therefore, 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 86 patients in the capecitabine group were included in the modified intention-to-treat analyses. 46 (50%) of 92 patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 45 (51%) of 92 in the capecitabine group were treatment naive for metastatic breast cancer. During a median follow-up of 17 months (IQR 9–22), median progression-free survival was 20·1 months (95% CI 14·2–21·8) in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group versus 14·4 months (12·1–17·0) in the capecitabine group (hazard ratio 0·659 95% CI 0·437–0·994, one-sided log-rank p=0·0235). Treatment-related grade 3 or worse neutropenia was more common in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group than in the capecitabine group (69 75% of 92 vs 14 16% of 86 patients). 2 (2%) patients in the palbociclib plus endocrine therapy group and 15 (17%) patients in the capecitabine group had treatment-related serious adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred.
Exemestane plus palbociclib with ovarian function suppression showed clinical benefit compared with capecitabine in terms of improved progression-free survival in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer. Palbociclib plus exemestane with ovarian suppression is an active treatment option in premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer who have been pretreated with tamoxifen.
Pfizer, Shinpoong, and Daewoong Korea and Takeda.
There has been reported that the association between nodal spread and tumor size was disrupted in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) and it showed characteristically early relapse. The TNM ...(tumor–node–metastasis) staging system might not be equally effective as a prognostic indicator for all subtypes. The aim of our study was to evaluate the usefulness of the staging according to subtypes.
We conducted a retrospective analysis of invasive breast cancer patients who received curative surgery at Samsung Medical Center from 2000 to 2004. Relapse-free survivals (RFS) by stage were analyzed.
Thousand eight hundred and seventy-nine patients who were available clinicopathologic data were included. These patients were divided into three subtypes: hormone receptor (HR)+, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2+, and triple negative groups. As the stage became more advanced, the slope of each stage of the RFS curves of patients with HR+ and HER2+ steadily increased. In contrast, RFS curves intermingled and showed overlap from stage 1 to 3A in TNBC patients. There was only wide separation of RFS curves between stage 1-3A and 3B-3C in TNBC.
The current TNM staging system might not be enough for encompassing the tumor biology and for predicting outcomes to make therapeutic decisions for all BCs, especially for TNBC patients.
Results from the phase III trial CLEOPATRA in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive first-line metastatic breast cancer demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free and ...overall survival with pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel over placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel. We carried out exploratory analyses of the incidence and time to development of central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients from CLEOPATRA.
Patients received pertuzumab/placebo: 840mg in cycle 1, then 420mg; trastuzumab: 8mg/kg in cycle 1, then 6mg/kg; docetaxel: initiated at 75mg/m2. Study drugs were administered i.v. every 3 weeks. The log-rank test was used for between-arm comparisons of time to CNS metastases as first site of disease progression and overall survival in patients with CNS metastases as first site of disease progression. The Kaplan–Meier approach was used to estimate median time to CNS metastases as first site of disease progression and median overall survival.
The incidence of CNS metastases as first site of disease progression was similar between arms; placebo arm: 51 of 406 (12.6%), pertuzumab arm: 55 of 402 (13.7%). Median time to development of CNS metastases as first site of disease progression was 11.9 months in the placebo arm and 15.0 months in the pertuzumab arm; hazard ratio (HR) = 0.58, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39–0.85, P = 0.0049. Overall survival in patients who developed CNS metastases as first site of disease progression showed a trend in favor of pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel; HR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.39–1.11. Median overall survival was 26.3 versus 34.4 months in the placebo and pertuzumab arms, respectively. Treatment comparison of the survival curves was not statistically significant for the log-rank test (P = 0.1139), but significant for the Wilcoxon test (P = 0.0449).
While the incidence of CNS metastases was similar between arms, our results suggest that pertuzumab, trastuzumab, and docetaxel delays the onset of CNS disease compared with placebo, trastuzumab, and docetaxel.
NCT00567190.
In the EMBRACA phase III trial, talazoparib (1mg daily, orally) demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in PFS versus physician’s choice of chemotherapy (PCT; capecitabine, eribulin, ...gemcitabine, or vinorelbine) in patients with HER2-negative advanced breast cancer carrying a germline BRCA1/2 mutation; we evaluated patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Patients were randomized 2 : 1 to receive talazoparib or PCT. PROs were assessed at day 1 (baseline), the start of each treatment cycle (every 3weeks), and at the end of treatment, using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-30) and its breast cancer module, QLQ-BR23. Prespecified exploratory analyses included a longitudinal mixed-effect model comparing treatment arms and a time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration (TTD) analysis carried out in the global health status/quality of life (GHS/QoL), and all functional and symptom scales from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and -BR23 questionnaires. Between-arm TTD comparisons were made using a stratified log-rank test and a Cox proportional hazards model.
Baseline scores were similar between arms. Statistically significant estimated overall improvement from baseline in GHS/QoL was seen for talazoparib compared with statistically significant deterioration for PCT {3.0 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.2, 4.8 versus −5.4 95% CI −8.8, −2.0; between arms, P<0.0001}. A statistically significant greater delay was observed in TTD in GHS/QoL, favoring talazoparib over PCT hazard ratio, 0.38 (95% CI 0.26, 0.55; median, 24.3 versus 6.3months, respectively; P<0.0001). A statistically significant overall change and a statistically significant delay in TTD, all favoring talazoparib, were also observed in multiple functions and symptoms.
Patients who received talazoparib had significant overall improvements and significant delay in TTD in multiple cancer-related and breast cancer-specific symptoms, functions, and GHS/QoL.
NCT01945775.
The phase Ib KEYNOTE-173 study was conducted to assess the safety and preliminary antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus pembrolizumab in high-risk, early-stage, non-metastatic ...triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Six pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy regimens were evaluated (cohorts A–F). All cohorts received a pembrolizumab 200-mg run-in dose (cycle 1), then eight cycles of pembrolizumab in combination with a taxane with or without carboplatin for 12 weeks, and then doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide for an additional 12 weeks before surgery. Primary end points were safety and recommended phase II dose (RP2D); secondary end points were pathological complete response (pCR) rate, objective response rate, and event-free and overall survival. Exploratory end points were the relationship between outcome and potential biomarkers, such as tumor programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (combined positive score) and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels (sTILs).
Sixty patients were enrolled between 18 February 2016, and 28 February 2017. Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 22 patients, most commonly febrile neutropenia (n = 10 across cohorts). Four cohorts (B, C, D, F) did not meet the RP2D threshold; two cohorts did (A, E). The most common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse event was neutropenia (73%). Immune-mediated adverse events and infusion reactions occurred in 18 patients (30%) and were grade ≥3 in six patients (10%). The pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0) across all cohorts was 60% (range 49%–71%). Twelve-month event-free and overall survival rates ranged from 80% to 100% across cohorts (100% for four cohorts). Higher pre-treatment PD-L1 combined positive score, and pre- and on-treatment sTILs were significantly associated with higher pCR rates (P = 0.0127, 0.0059, and 0.0085, respectively).
Combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy and pembrolizumab for high-risk, early-stage TNBC showed manageable toxicity and promising antitumor activity. In an exploratory analysis, the pCR rate showed a positive correlation with tumor PD-L1 expression and sTIL levels.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02622074.
•Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab + chemotherapy showed no unexpected safety findings in patients with high-risk, early-stage TNBC.•Two chemotherapy regimens met the RP2D threshold: nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m2 qw; paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 qw + carboplatin AUC5 q3w.•pCR rate (ypT0/Tis ypN0) across all cohorts was 60% and 12-month EFS and OS rates ranged from 80% to 100% across cohorts.•pCR rate showed positive correlation with tumor PD-L1 expression and stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte levels.
In EMBRACA, talazoparib prolonged progression-free survival versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio HR 0.542 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.413-0.711; P < 0.0001) and improved patient-reported outcomes ...(PRO) in germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2)-mutated advanced breast cancer (ABC). We report final overall survival (OS).
This randomized phase III trial enrolled patients with gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative ABC. Patients received talazoparib or physician's choice of chemotherapy. OS was analyzed using stratified HR and log-rank test and prespecified rank-preserving structural failure time model to account for subsequent treatments.
A total of 431 patients were entered in a randomized study (287 talazoparib/144 chemotherapy) with 412 patients treated (286 talazoparib/126 chemotherapy). By 30 September 2019, 216 deaths (75.3%) occurred for talazoparib and 108 (75.0%) chemotherapy; median follow-up was 44.9 and 36.8 months, respectively. HR for OS with talazoparib versus chemotherapy was 0.848 (95% CI 0.670-1.073; P = 0.17); median (95% CI) 19.3 months (16.6-22.5 months) versus 19.5 months (17.4-22.4 months). Kaplan–Meier survival percentages (95% CI) for talazoparib versus chemotherapy: month 12, 71% (66% to 76%)/74% (66% to 81%); month 24, 42% (36% to 47%)/38% (30% to 47%); month 36, 27% (22% to 33%)/21% (14% to 29%). Most patients received subsequent treatments: for talazoparib and chemotherapy, 46.3%/41.7% received platinum and 4.5%/32.6% received a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor, respectively. Adjusting for subsequent PARP and/or platinum use, HR for OS was 0.756 (95% bootstrap CI 0.503-1.029). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 69.6% (talazoparib) and 64.3% (chemotherapy) patients, consistent with previous reports. Extended follow-up showed significant overall improvement and delay in time to definitive clinically meaningful deterioration in global health status/quality of life and breast symptoms favoring talazoparib versus chemotherapy (P < 0.01 for all), consistent with initial analyses.
In gBRCA1/2-mutated HER2-negative ABC, talazoparib did not significantly improve OS over chemotherapy; subsequent treatments may have impacted analysis. Safety was consistent with previous observations. PRO continued to favor talazoparib.
•In BRCA1/2-mutated advanced breast cancer, talazoparib did not significantly improve overall survival (OS) versus chemotherapy.•OS was generally consistent across subgroups including by prior platinum, hormone-receptor status, or line of treatment.•Most patients received subsequent systemic treatments, which may have confounded the survival outcome.•Toxicities were managed by supportive care medication/dose modifications; safety was consistent with previous observations.•Extended follow-up of patient-reported outcomes continued to favor talazoparib over chemotherapy.
Background
Periostin is a matricellular protein, and its synthesis in airway epithelial cells and lung fibroblasts is induced by interleukin (IL)‐4 and IL‐13. The significance of periostin as a ...biomarker of TH2‐induced airway inflammation, and (importantly) as a measure of the response to TH2‐targeted therapy, has recently been emphasized. We explored the relationship between periostin and airway hyperresponsiveness (AHR) in asthmatic children.
Methods
The study included 83 children aged 6–15 years in an asthmatic group (n = 54) and healthy controls (n = 29). We measured the periostin levels in serum and performed methacholine and mannitol provocation challenges. The responses to mannitol were expressed as the provocative dose causing a 15% fall in the FEV1 (the PD15 dose).
Results
Of the 54 subjects with asthma, all had positive methacholine bronchial provocation test (BPT) results and 38 had positive mannitol BPT results. Children with asthma had significantly higher periostin levels than controls 76.0 (65.0–91.8) vs 71.0 (57.5–80.0) ng/mL; P = 0.017. Periostin levels were significantly correlated with both the methacholine PC20 and mannitol PD15 values.
Conclusion
Serum levels of periostin, a new biomarker induced by IL‐13, were higher in asthmatic children, and were associated with AHR to methacholine and mannitol.
Purpose
This multi-center, randomized, phase III study was conducted to demonstrate the non-inferiority of DA-3031 compared with daily filgrastim in patients during the first cycle of chemotherapy ...for breast cancer in terms of the duration of severe neutropenia (DSN).
Methods
Seventy-four patients with breast cancer who were receiving combination chemotherapy with docetaxel, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (TAC) were enrolled. All participants were randomized to receive either daily subcutaneous injections of filgrastim 100 μg/m
2
/day for up to 10 days or a single subcutaneous injection of DA-3031 at fixed doses of 6 mg on day 2 of each chemotherapy cycle.
Results
The mean duration of grade 4 (G4) neutropenia in cycle 1 was 2.08 ± 0.85 days for the filgrastim group and 2.28 ± 1.14 days for the DA-3031 group. The difference between groups was 0.2 ± 1.10 days (95 % confidence interval (CI) = −0.26, 0.66), which supported non-inferiority. No statistically significant differences were observed in nadir absolute neutrophil count (ANC) (154.34/mm
3
and 161.75/mm
3
for the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively;
P
= 0.8414) or in time to ANC recovery (10.03 ± 0.75 and 9.83 ± 1.56 days in the filgrastim and DA-3031 groups, respectively;
P
= 0.0611) during cycle 1. Serious AEs occurred in six (15.8 %) patients receiving filgrastim and in ten (27.8 %) patients receiving DA-3031; however, none was determined to be related to the study drug.
Conclusions
DA-3031 and daily filgrastim are similar in regard to DSN and safety in breast cancer patients receiving TAC chemotherapy.
PDF
