The current work-up of the primary tumor site of a head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of unknown primary is not standardized and results in several time-consuming procedures that delay treatment ...initiation. This article seeks to consolidate contemporary strategies used to identify the primary tumor site of an unknown primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma and offer recommendations based on current literature review.
Background
Tubarial glands are a new organ at risk for head and neck cancer radiation therapy (RT). We aimed to study the feasibility of sparing them using intensity‐modulated radiation therapy ...(IMRT).
Methods
Tubarial glands were delineated for 17 patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma receiving definitive RT, and treatment plans were re‐optimized to spare dose to the tubarial glands while maintaining target coverage. A paired t test was performed to compare the mean dose of tubarial glands and target coverage.
Results
The difference in mean doses was 4.9 and 7.0 Gy for the ipsilateral and contralateral tubarial glands, respectively (p < 0.01). The mean dose to tubarial gland was ≤39 Gy in 35% versus 47% (ipsilateral) and 70% versus 100% (contralateral) in clinical and re‐optimized plans, respectively. Re‐optimized ipsilateral tubarial gland mean ≤39 Gy was achieved more commonly in patients with base of tongue versus tonsil primaries (86% vs. 20%, p = 0.02).
Conclusion
This pilot study demonstrates the dosimetric feasibility of tubarial gland sparing with IMRT. Dosimetric constraints need to be determined with larger studies.
Radiation therapy (RT) plays a crucial role in the treatment of head and neck cancers (HNCs). This paper emphasizes the importance of effective communication and collaboration between radiation ...oncologists and dental specialists in the HNC care pathway. It also provides an overview of the role of RT in HNC treatment and illustrates the interdisciplinary collaboration between these teams to optimize patient care, expedite treatment, and prevent post-treatment oral complications. The methods utilized include a thorough analysis of existing research articles, case reports, and clinical guidelines, with terms such as 'dental management', 'oral oncology', 'head and neck cancer', and 'radiotherapy' included for this review. The findings underscore the significance of the early involvement of dental specialists in the treatment planning phase to assess and prepare patients for RT, including strategies such as prophylactic tooth extraction to mitigate potential oral complications. Furthermore, post-treatment oral health follow-up and management by dental specialists are crucial in minimizing the incidence and severity of RT-induced oral sequelae. In conclusion, these proactive measures help minimize dental and oral complications before, during, and after treatment.
As more cancer patients survive their disease, concerns about radiation therapy-induced side effects have increased. The concept of radioprotection and radiation injury mitigation and treatment ...offers the possibility to enhance the therapeutic ratio of radiation therapy by limiting radiation therapy-induced normal tissue injury without compromising its antitumor effect. Advances in the understanding of the underlying mechanisms of radiation toxicity have stimulated radiation oncologists to target these pathways across different organ systems. These generalized radiation injury mechanisms include production of free radicals such as superoxides, activation of inflammatory pathways, and vascular endothelial dysfunction leading to tissue hypoxia. There is a significant body of literature evaluating the effectiveness of various treatments in preventing, mitigating, or treating radiation-induced normal tissue injury. Whereas some reviews have focused on a specific disease site or agent, this critical review focuses on a mechanistic classification of activity and assesses multiple agents across different disease sites. The classification of agents used herein further offers a useful framework to organize the multitude of treatments that have been studied. Many commonly available treatments have demonstrated benefit in prevention, mitigation, and/or treatment of radiation toxicity and warrant further investigation. These drug-based approaches to radioprotection and radiation injury mitigation and treatment represent an important method of making radiation therapy safer.
Abstract Specialist palliative care (PC) often embraces a “less is more” philosophy that runs counter to the revenue-centric nature of most health care financing in the U.S. A special business case ...is needed in which the financial benefits for organizations such as hospitals and payers are aligned with the demonstrable clinical benefits for patients. Based on published studies and our work with PC programs over the past 15 years, we identified 10 principles that together form a business model for specialist PC. These principles are relatively well established for inpatient PC but are only now emerging for community-based PC. Three developments that are key for the latter are the increasing penalties from payers for overutilization of hospital stays, the variety of alternative payment models such as accountable care organizations, which foster a population health management perspective, and payer-provider partnerships that allow for greater access to and funding of community-based PC.
•Diabetes presence increased radiographic changes after thoracic SBRT.•The diabetes effect peaked early after treatment but persisted at 12 months.•Pneumonitis occurred more often in diabetics, ...independent of radiographic changes.•Smoking, race, tumor site, and other factors correlated with radiographic changes.•Greater caution treating diabetic patients with SBRT may be warranted.
Radiographic radiation induced lung injury (RILI) is frequently observed after stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). Models of radiographic change can identify patient risk factors that predict clinical toxicity. We examined the association between radiographic lung changes and lung tissue dose-density response over time with clinical risk factors for RILI, such as diabetes.
424 baseline and follow up CT scans at 3, 6, and 12 months post-treatment were analyzed in 116 patients (27 with diabetes) undergoing thoracic SBRT. Volumes of dense/hazy regions and lung parenchyma dose-density response curves were evaluated with respect to follow up time, diabetes, and other factors.
Dense and hazy tissue regions were larger in the diabetic population, with the effect most pronounced at 3 months. Similarly, dose-density response curves showed greater density change versus dose in the diabetic group (all p < 0.05). Diabetes, time, the interaction of diabetes and time, smoking status, African American race, baseline lung density, and tumor location were significantly associated with radiographic changes on mixed effect analyses. PTV size, pulmonary function, and medication exposure did not significantly impact RILI. Clinical grade 1–2 pneumonitis was more prevalent in diabetic patients (p = 0.02). However, radiographic change did not correlate with clinical pneumonitis.
The presence of diabetes and other clinical factors is associated with increased volume and density of radiographic RILI after lung SBRT, most prominently early after treatment. This is the first report demonstrating the increased severity of RILI after SBRT in diabetic patients. Increased caution treating diabetic patients may be warranted.
The impact of radiation dose to the heart in early-stage lung cancer patients treated with definitive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is not well known. We, therefore, analyzed whether ...higher radiation dose to the heart would lead to an increase in cardiac toxicity and overall mortality.
Seventy-four patients with 75 tumors treated definitively with SBRT for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and two cases of limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC) with an average follow-up of 35 months (range, 1-130 months) were retrospectively analyzed. The whole heart and cardiac substructures including atria, ventricles, heart valves, atrioventricular (AV) node and four major coronary artery branches were contoured using commercial treatment planning software. For each structure, multiple dose-volume parameters were recorded. The relation between radiation doses to the heart, tumor location, and preexisting medical conditions with the development of cardiac events and mortality was assessed.
Overall, there was large variability in dose to cardiac substructures: mean heart dose (MHD) averaged 1.90 Gy (range, 0.04-11.00 Gy) equivalent 2 Gy dose (EQD2) and average max dose to the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was 5.67 Gy (range, 0.04-48.60 Gy) EQD2. Patients with tumor location in the upper lobes received higher cardiac radiation dose compared to other lobes (P<0.0001). There was no difference in MHD between central and peripheral tumor locations. The distance between heart and tumor was negatively associated with MHD (r=-0.61, P<0.0001). Eighteen patients developed cardiac complications including the need for defibrillator placement, arrhythmia development and worsening heart failure. Preexisting cardiac disease was associated with an increased number of cardiac events after radiotherapy (P=0.039). However, neither radiation dose to the whole heart or the cardiac substructures, nor comorbidities such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension or COPD were associated with the number of cardiac events or overall mortality.
Radiation doses to the heart and its substructures show large variability. Cardiac events occurred more frequently in patients with a history of heart problems. At present, the effect of radiation dose on cardiac toxicity is unclear in patients undergoing SBRT for early-stage lung cancer. Longer follow-up and a larger cohort are needed to assess for late cardiac sequelae.
PDF
