Summary
Background
After liver transplantation primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), the condition returns in the transplanted liver in a subset of patients (recurrent primary sclerosing cholangitis, ...rPSC).
Aim
To define risk factors for rPSC.
Methods
We searched Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane library for articles published until March 2018. Studies addressing risk factors for developing rPSC were eligible for inclusion. A random effects meta‐analysis was conducted using hazard ratios (HR) as effect measure. Study quality was evaluated with the Newcastle Ottawa scale. Statistical analysis was performed using Cochrane Review Manager.
Results
The electronic database search yielded 449 results. Twenty‐one retrospective cohort studies met the inclusion criteria for the review; 14 were included in the meta‐analysis. The final cohort included 2159 patients (age range 31‐49 years, 68.8% male), of whom 17.7% developed rPSC. Colectomy before liver transplantation, HR 0.65 (95% CI: 0.42‐0.99), cholangiocarcinoma before liver transplantation, HR 2.42 (95% CI: 1.20‐4.86), inflammatory bowel disease, HR 1.73 (95% CI: 1.17‐2.54), donor age, HR 1.24 (95% CI 1.0‐1.45) per ten years, MELD score, HR 1.05 (95% CI: 1.02‐1.08) per point and acute cellular rejection, HR of 1.94 (95% CI: 1.32‐2.83) were associated with the risk of rPSC.
Conclusions
Multiple risk factors for rPSC were identified. Colectomy before liver transplantation reduced the risk of rPSC.
Liver transplantation remains the only effective evidence based treatment for advanced primary sclerosing cholangitis. However, recurrence of disease occurs in approximately 18%.
This study aimed to ...assess risk factors of recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis.
A retrospective cohort study was performed on patients undergoing transplantation for recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis in two academic centers (Leuven, Belgium and Leiden, The Netherlands). Besides other risk factors, the degree of mucosal inflammation was assessed as a potential risk factor using histological Geboes scores.
81 patients were included, of which 62 (76.5%) were diagnosed with ulcerative colitis. Seventeen patients (21.0%) developed rPSC during a median follow-up time of 5.2 years. In a subset of 42 patients no association was found between the degree of mucosal inflammation and recurrence, using both original Geboes scores and multiple cut-off points. In the total cohort, cytomegaloviremia post-transplantation (HR: 4.576, 95%CI 1.688–12.403) and younger receiver age at time of liver transplantation (HR: 0.934, 95%CI 0.881–0.990) were independently associated with an increased risk of recurrence of disease.
This study found no association between the degree of mucosal inflammation and recurrence of primary sclerosing cholangitis. An association with recurrence was found for cytomegaloviremia post-liver transplantation and younger age at time of liver transplantation.
Summary
Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) with donation after circulatory death (DCD) often leads to a higher first week peak alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and a higher rate of biliary ...nonanastomotic strictures (NAS) as compared to donation after brain death (DBD). This retrospective study was to evaluate whether an association exists between peak ALT and the development of NAS in OLT with livers from DBD (n = 399) or DCD (n = 97) from two transplantation centers. Optimal cutoff value of peak ALT for risk of development of NAS post‐DCD‐OLT was 1300 IU/l. The 4‐year cumulative incidence of NAS after DCD‐OLT was 49.5% in patients with a high ALT peak post‐OLT, compared with 11.3% in patients with a low ALT peak. (P < 0.001). No relation between peak ALT and NAS was observed after DBD‐OLT. Multivariate analysis revealed peak ALT ≥1300 IU/l adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 3.71, confidence interval (CI) (1.26–10.91) and donor age aHR = 1.04, CI 1.00–1.07 to be independently associated with development of NAS post‐DCD‐OLT. A peak ALT of <1300 IU/l carries a risk for NAS similar to DBD‐OLT. Thus, in DCD‐OLT, but not in DBD‐OLT, peak ALT discriminates patients at high or low risk for NAS.
Background
Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the bile ducts, frequently necessitating orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), often accompanied by inflammatory ...bowel disease (IBD). Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are associated with fibrotic diseases caused by the involvement in tissue remodelling.
Aim
To evaluate the contribution of MMP‐2 and ‐9 promoter polymorphisms to disease severity in PSC, as assessed by death or need for OLT.
Methods
Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 (−1306 C/T) and ‐9 (−1562 C/T) gene promoter polymorphisms were analyzed in 132 PSC patients. Follow‐up was from onset PSC until death, OLT or end of follow‐up.
Results
Twenty‐year cumulative incidence (CI) of death or OLT for PSC patients with MMP‐2 CT genotype was 86.5% compared to 52.8% for CC genotype (P = 0.030) and reached 100% at 11.3 years for TT genotype. In patients with IBD, CIs were similar: 20‐years CI of death or OLT for MMP‐2 CT genotype was 86.0% compared to 49.0% for CC genotype and 100% at 11.3 years for TT genotype. Patients without IBD showed a similar trend in 20 years CI for MMP‐2 CT (77.8%) compared to CC (57.8%) and CI for TT genotype reached 100% at 9.3 years. Multivariate analysis showed, along with age at diagnosis, a stepwise increase in hazard ratio for MMP‐2 T‐allele polymorphism for death or OLT. MMP‐9 genotype was not associated with disease severity in PSC.
Conclusion
Matrix metalloproteinase‐2 C to T‐1306 gene promoter polymorphism in PSC is an independent risk factor for disease severity as reflected by the need for OLT or disease progression leading to mortality.
Patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) almost invariably require lifelong immunosuppressive treatment. There is genuine concern about the efficacy and tolerability of the current standard ...combination therapy of prednisolone and azathioprine. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has emerged as an alternative option. The aim of this study was to compare MMF to azathioprine as induction therapy for AIH.
In this 24-week, prospective, randomised, open-label, multicentre superiority trial, 70 patients with treatment-naive AIH received either MMF or azathioprine, both in combination with prednisolone. The primary endpoint was biochemical remission defined as normalisation of serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and IgG after 24 weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints included safety and tolerability.
Seventy patients (mean 57.9 years SD 14.0; 72.9% female) were randomly assigned to the MMF plus prednisolone (n = 39) or azathioprine plus prednisolone (n = 31) group. The primary endpoint was met in 56.4% and 29.0% of patients assigned to the MMF group and the azathioprine group, respectively (difference, 27.4 percentage points; 95% CI 4.0 to 46.7; p = 0.022). The MMF group exhibited higher complete biochemical response rates at 6 months (72.2% vs. 32.3%; p = 0.004). No serious adverse events occurred in patients who received MMF (0%) but serious adverse events were reported in four patients who received azathioprine (12.9%) (p = 0.034). Two patients in the MMF group (5.1%) and eight patients in the azathioprine group (25.8%) discontinued treatment owing to adverse events or serious adverse events (p = 0.018).
In patients with treatment-naive AIH, MMF with prednisolone led to a significantly higher rate of biochemical remission at 24 weeks compared to azathioprine combined with prednisolone. Azathioprine use was associated with more (serious) adverse events leading to cessation of treatment, suggesting superior tolerability of MMF.
This randomised-controlled trial directly compares azathioprine and mycophenolate mofetil, both in combination with prednisolone, for the induction of biochemical remission in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis. Achieving complete remission is desirable to prevent disease progression. Patients assigned to the mycophenolate mofetil group reached biochemical remission more often and experienced fewer adverse events. The findings in this trial may contribute to the re-evaluation of international guidelines for the standard of care in treatment-naive patients with autoimmune hepatitis.
#NCT02900443.
Display omitted
•Limited efficacy and tolerability of standard prednisolone and azathioprine combination therapy in autoimmune hepatitis.•Mycophenolate mofetil combined with prednisolone is effective as first-line therapy for achieving biochemical remission.•Mycophenolate mofetil has a more favourable tolerability profile than azathioprine.
The aim of the present study was to assess whether flushing the donor liver with urokinase immediately before implantation reduces the incidence of nonanastomotic biliary strictures (NASs) after ...liver transplantation, without causing increased blood loss, analyzed as a historical cohort study. Between January 2005 and October 2012, all liver (re‐)transplantations were included. Of the 185 liver transplant recipients included, 63 donor livers between January 2010 and October 2012 received urokinase (study group), whereas the donor liver of 122 consecutive recipients, who served as a historical control group, between January 2005 and January 2010 did not receive urokinase. Basic donor (Eurotransplant donor risk index) and recipient (age, body mass index, laboratory Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score) characteristics did not significantly differ in both groups. Thirty‐three recipients developed NASs: 22 in the control group (18%) and 11 (17.5%) in the study group (P = 0.68). Analyzed separately for donation after circulatory death (P = 0.42) or donation after brain death (P = 0.89), there was no difference between the groups in incidence of NAS. Of all the recipients developing NAS, 7 (21%) needed retransplantation and all others were treated conservatively. Autologous blood transfusion requirements did not differ significantly between both groups (P = 0.91), whereas interestingly, more heterologous blood transfusions were needed in the control group (P < 0.001). This study has its limitations by its retrospective character. A multi‐institutional prospective study could clarify this issue. In conclusion, arterial flushing of the liver with urokinase immediately before implantation did not lead to a lower incidence of NAS in this study, nor did it lead to increased blood loss. Liver Transplantation 22 420‐426 2016 AASLD
Currently, the standard therapy for autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) consists of a combination of prednisolone and azathioprine. However, 15% of patients are intolerant to azathioprine which necessitates ...cessation of azathioprine or changes in therapy. In addition, not all patients achieve complete biochemical response (CR). Uncontrolled data indicate that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) can induce CR in a majority of patients. Better understanding of first-line treatment and robust evidence from randomised clinical trials are needed. The aim of this study was to explore the potential benefits of MMF as compared to azathioprine, both combined with prednisolone, as induction therapy in a randomised controlled trial in patients with treatment-naive AIH.
CAMARO is a randomised (1:1), open-label, parallel-group, multicentre superiority trial. All patients with AIH are screened for eligibility. Seventy adult patients with AIH from fourteen centres in the Netherlands and Belgium will be randomised to receive MMF or azathioprine. Both treatment arms will start with prednisolone as induction therapy. The primary outcome is biochemical remission, defined as serum levels of alanine aminotransferase and immunoglobulin G below the upper limit of normal. Secondary outcomes include safety and tolerability of MMF and azathioprine, time to remission, changes in Model For End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-score, adverse events, and aspects of quality of life. The study period will last for 24 weeks.
The CAMARO trial investigates whether treatment with MMF and prednisolone increases the proportion of patients in remission compared with azathioprine and prednisolone as the current standard treatment strategy. In addition, we reflect on the challenges of conducting a randomized trial in rare diseases.
EudraCT 2016-001038-91 . Prospectively registered on 18 April 2016.
PDF
