Central nervous system (CNS) metastases are common in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Osimertinib has shown systemic efficacy in patients with CNS metastases, and early clinical ...evidence shows efficacy in the CNS. To evaluate osimertinib activity further, we present a pre-specified subgroup analysis of CNS response using pooled data from two phase II studies: AURA extension (NCT01802632) and AURA2 (NCT02094261).
Patients with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, who had progressed following prior epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment, received osimertinib 80mg od (n=411). Patients with stable, asymptomatic CNS metastases were eligible for enrolment; prior CNS treatment was allowed. Patients with≥1 measurable CNS lesion (per RECIST 1.1) on baseline brain scan by blinded independent central neuroradiology review (BICR) were included in the evaluable for CNS response set (cEFR). The primary outcome for this CNS analysis was CNS objective response rate (ORR) by BICR; secondary outcomes included CNS duration of response, disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS).
Of 128 patients with CNS metastases on baseline brain scans, 50 were included in the cEFR. Confirmed CNS ORR and DCR were 54% 27/50; 95% confidence interval (CI) 39–68 and 92% (46/50; 95% CI 81–98), respectively. CNS response was observed regardless of prior radiotherapy to the brain. Median CNS duration of response (22% maturity) was not reached (range, 1–15months); at 9months, 75% (95% CI 53–88) of patients were estimated to remain in response. Median follow-up for CNS PFS was 11months; median CNS PFS was not reached (95% CI, 7, not calculable). The safety profile observed in the cEFR was consistent with the overall patient population.
Osimertinib demonstrated clinically meaningful efficacy against CNS metastases, with a high DCR, encouraging ORR, and safety profile consistent with that reported previously.
NCT01802632; NCT02094261
In AURA3 (NCT02151981), osimertinib, a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), significantly prolonged progression-free survival and improved ...response in patients with EGFR T790M advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and progression on prior EGFR-TKI treatment. We report the final AURA3 overall survival (OS) analysis.
Adult patients were randomized 2 : 1 to osimertinib (80 mg orally, once daily) or pemetrexed plus carboplatin/cisplatin (platinum–pemetrexed) intravenously, every 3 weeks (≤6 cycles). Patients could crossover to osimertinib on progression confirmed by blinded independent central review. OS and safety were secondary end points.
A total of 279 patients were randomly assigned to receive osimertinib and 140 to platinum–pemetrexed (136 received treatment). At data cut-off (DCO; 15 March 2019), 188 patients (67%) receiving osimertinib versus 93 (66%) receiving platinum–pemetrexed had died. The hazard ratio (HR) for OS was 0.87 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.67–1.12; P = 0.277; the median OS was 26.8 months (95% CI 23.5–31.5) versus 22.5 months (95% CI 20.2–28.8) for osimertinib and platinum–pemetrexed, respectively. The estimated 24- and 36-month survival was 55% versus 43% and 37% versus 30%, respectively. After crossover adjustment, there was an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18–1.6). Time to first subsequent therapy or death showed a clinically meaningful advantage toward osimertinib (HR 0.21, 95% CI 0.16–0.28; P < 0.001). At DCO, 99/136 (73%) patients in the platinum–pemetrexed arm had crossed over to osimertinib, 66/99 (67%) of whom had died. The most common adverse events possibly related to study treatment were diarrhea (32%; grade ≥3, 1%) and rash (grouped term; 32%; grade ≥3, <1%) in the osimertinib arm, versus nausea (47%; grade ≥3, 3%) in the platinum–pemetrexed arm.
In patients with T790M advanced NSCLC, no statistically significant benefit in OS was observed for osimertinib versus platinum–pemetrexed, which possibly reflects the high crossover rate of patients from platinum–pemetrexed to osimertinib.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02151981; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02151981.
•Median OS with osimertinib was 26.8 months versus 22.5 months with platinum–pemetrexed (HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.67–1.12; P = 0.277).•The lack of a significant survival benefit could reflect high percentage (73%) of platinum–pemetrexed to osimertinib crossover.•Analysis of OS adjusted for crossover showed an HR of 0.54 (95% CI 0.18–1.60).•Among patients receiving subsequent anticancer therapy, platinum chemotherapy was the most common after osimertinib (65%).•Grade ≥3 (possibly treatment-related) adverse events were observed less frequently with osimertinib (9% versus 34% with platinum–pemetrexed).
ASP8273, a novel, small molecule, irreversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) specifically inhibits the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in patients with activating mutations or EGFR T790M ...resistance mutations. The current study examines the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ASP8273 versus erlotinib or gefitinib in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations not previously treated with an EGFR inhibitor.
This global, phase III, open-label, randomized study evaluated ASP8273 versus erlotinib/gefitinib in patients with locally advanced, metastatic, or unresectable stage IIIB/IV NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations. They were ineligible if they received prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary end points included overall survival, investigator-assessed PFS, best overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate, duration of response (DoR), and the safety/tolerability profile.
Patients (n=530) were randomized 1 : 1 to receive ASP8273 (n=267) or erlotinib/gefitinib (n=263). Patient demographics between both treatment groups were generally balanced. Median PFS was 9.3months (95% CI 5.6–11.1months) for patients receiving ASP8273 and 9.6months (95% CI 8.8–NE) for the erlotinib/gefitinib group, with a hazard ratio of 1.611 (P=0.992). The ORR in the ASP8273 group was 33% (95% CI 27.4–39.0) versus 47.9% (95% CI 41.7–54.1) in the erlotinib/gefitinib group. Median DoR was similar for both groups (9.2months for ASP8273 versus 9.0months for erlotinib/gefitinib). More grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in patients receiving ASP8273 than in those receiving erlotinib/gefitinib (54.7% versus 43.5%). An independent data monitoring committee carried out an interim safety analysis and recommended discontinuing the study due to toxicity and limited predicted efficacy of ASP8273 relative to erlotinib/gefitinib.
First-line ASP8273 did not show improved PFS or equivalent toxicities versus erlotinib/gefitinib.
NCT02588261.
Abstract Objectives As the bioavailability of erlotinib is dependent on gastric pH, an increase in gastric pH via the concurrent use of gastric acid suppressive medications (AS) may reduce its ...bioavailability and efficacy. We retrospectively analyzed the BR.21 trial database to pragmatically evaluate the impact of AS use on the median plasma drug levels of erlotinib, adverse events and outcome of participants. Methods Monthly median plasma levels of erlotinib were compared between participants utilizing AS and those who did not using a Wilcoxon test. Interaction p -value for AS users and AS non-users was performed using a multivariate Cox model with a time-dependent covariate for AS use. Grade 2 adverse events were compared using Fisher's Exact Test. Results The median plasma erlotinib level was not significantly different between AS users and AS non-users, and AS use did not appear to incur a negative impact on PFS or OS (Interaction p -values: PFS p = 0.16; OS p = 0.81). AS users receiving erlotinib had a similar frequency of rash (50.5% vs. 42.0%, p = 0.08) and a statistically higher rate of diarrhea (27.9% vs. 15.6%, p = 0.001) compared to AS non-users. In addition, AS users had higher rates of infections (erlotinib arm: 33.7% vs. 20.0%, p < 0.0001; placebo arm: 22.7% vs. 10.8%, p = 0.02). Conclusion This retrospective analysis found that the co-administration of AS and erlotinib did not appear to have a significant impact on the median plasma drug levels or outcome.
A number of studies have observed increased cancer incidence rates among individuals who have received renal transplants. Generally, however, these studies have been limited by relatively small ...sample sizes, short follow‐up intervals or focused on only one cancer site. We conducted a nationwide population‐based study of 11,155 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 1981 and 1998. Incident cancers were identified up to December 31, 1999, through record linkage to the Canadian Cancer Registry. Patterns of cancer incidence in the cohort were compared to the Canadian general population using standardized incidence ratios (SIRs). We examined variations in risk according time since transplantation, year of transplantation and age at transplantation. In our patient population, we observed a total of 778 incident cancers versus 313.2 expected (SIR = 2.5, 95% CI = 2.3–2.7). Site‐specific SIRs were highest for cancer of the lip (SIR = 31.3, 95% CI = 23.5–40.8), non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) (SIR = 8.8, 95% CI = 7.4–10.5), and kidney cancer (SIR = 7.3, 95% CI = 5.7–9.2). SIRs for NHL and cancer of the lip and kidney were highest and among transplant patients. This study confirms previous findings of increased risks of posttransplant cancer. Our findings underscore the need for increased vigilance among kidney transplant recipients for cancers at sites where there are no population‐based screening programs in place.
This nationwide study of cancer risk in kidney transplant patients found a standardized incidence ratio of 2.5 compared to expected rates.
The expression of programmed death (PD) ligand 1 (PD-L1) protein expression assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) has been correlated with response and survival benefit from anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immune ...checkpoint inhibitor therapies in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The efficacy of several agents appears correlated with PD-L1 expression. It remains controversial whether PD-L1 is prognostic in NSCLC. We assessed the prognostic value of PD-L1 IHC and its predictive role for adjuvant chemotherapy in early stage NSCLC.
Tumor sections from three pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (IALT, JBR.10, CALGB 9633) using the E1L3N antibody were studied in this pooled analysis. PD-L1 staining intensity and percentage in both tumor cells (TCs) and immune cells (ICs) were scored by two pathologists. The average or consensus PD-L1 expression levels across intensities and/or percent cells stained were correlated with clinicopathological and molecular features, patient survivals and potential benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy.
Results from 982 patients were available for analysis. Considering staining at any intensities for overall PD-L1 expression, 314 (32.0%), 204 (20.8%) and 141 (14.3%) tumor samples were positive for PD-L1 staining on TCs using cut-offs at ≥1%, ≥10% and ≥25%, respectively. For PD-L1 expressing ICs, 380 (38.7%), 308 (31.4%) and 148 (15.1%) were positive at ≥ 1%, ≥10% and 25% cut-offs, respectively. Positive PD-L1 was correlated with squamous histology, intense lymphocytic infiltrate, andKRAS but not withTP53 mutation.EGFR mutated tumors showed statistically non-significant lower PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was neither prognostic with these cut-offs nor other exploratory cut-offs, nor were predictive for survival benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.
PD-L1 IHC is not a prognostic factor in early stage NSCLC patients. It is also not predictive for adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in these patients.
Currently, it is not well understood how ligands of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) modify inflammatory responses triggered by Toll-like receptor (TLR) agonists in human dendritic cells (DCs). ...Here, we show that AhR ligands 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p
-dioxin (TCDD), the tryptophan derivatives 6-formylindolo3,2-b carbazole (FICZ), kynurenine (kyn), and the natural dietary compound indole-3-carbinol (I3C) differentially modify cytokine expression in human monocyte-derived DCs (MoDCs). The results show that TLR-activated MoDCs express higher levels of AhR and are more sensitive toward the effects of AhR ligands. Depending on the cytokine, treatment with AhR ligands led to a synergistic or antagonistic effect of the TLR-triggered response in MoDCs. Thus, activation of AhR increased the expression of interleukin (IL)-1β, but decreased the expression of IL-12A in TLR-activated MoDCs. Furthermore, TCDD and FICZ may have opposite effects on the expression of cytochrome P4501A1 (CYP1A1) in TLR8-activated MoDCs indicating that the effect of the specific AhR ligand may depend on the presence of the specific TLR agonist. Gene silencing showed that synergistic effects of AhR ligands on TLR-induced expression of IL-1β require a functional AhR and the expression of NF-κB RelB. On the other hand, repression of IL-12A by TCDD and FICZ involved the induction of the caudal type homeobox 2 (CDX2) transcription factor. Additionally, the levels of DC surface markers were decreased in MoDCs by TCDD, FICZ and I3C, but not by kyn. Overall, these data demonstrate that AhR modulates TLR-induced expression of cytokines and DC-specific surface markers in MoDCs involving NFκB RelB and the immune regulatory factor CDX2.
Testing for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangement has become standard in managing advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many institutions in Europe, North America and other world ...regions continue to face a common challenge of facilitating timely molecular testing with rapid result turnaround time. We assessed the prevalence of biomarker testing for advanced NSCLC patients and whether testing affected the timeliness of treatment decisions.
We conducted a retrospective chart review of a random sample of one-quarter of all patients with advanced NSCLC referred to the Princess Margaret Cancer Centre from 1 April 2010 to 31 March 2013.
Of 300 patients reviewed, 175 seen by medical oncology had nonsquamous NSCLC, 72% of whom had biomarker testing carried out. Patients tested for biomarkers were more likely to be female (47% versus 21%, P = 0.002), Asian (27% versus 6%, P = 0.005) and never smokers (42% versus 8%, P < 0.0001). Only 21% of patients with biomarker testing had results available at their initial oncology consultation. This group had a shorter median time from consultation to treatment decision (0 versus 22 days, P = 0.0008) and time to treatment start (16 versus 29, P = 0.004). Thirteen percent underwent repeat biopsy for molecular testing after the initial consultation. Of those with positive EGFR or ALK results, 19% started chemotherapy before biomarker results became available.
Awaiting biomarker testing results can delay treatment decisions and treatment initiation for patients with advanced NSCLC. This may be avoided by incorporating reflex biomarker testing into diagnostic algorithms for NSCLC at the level of the pathologist, and further education of specialists involved in obtaining diagnostic cancer specimens to ensure they are sufficient for molecular testing.
Prevention of osteoporosis in adulthood begins with optimizing bone health in early life. The longitudinal association between growth and bone accretion during childhood is not fully understood.
To ...assess the acquisition of whole-body (WB) and skeletal site-specific bone mineral content (BMC) relative to linear growth in a healthy, diverse, longitudinal cohort of children, adolescents, and young adults and to test for differences related to sex and African American race.
This investigation was a mixed longitudinal study with annual assessments for up to 7 years at 5 US clinical centers. Participants were healthy children, adolescents, and young adults. The study dates were July 2002 through March 2010. The dates of the analysis were June through December 2016.
Anthropometrics, BMC, and body composition via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry. The superimposition by translation and rotation (SITAR) analysis method was used to define the mean trajectories for height, WB lean soft tissue, appendicular lean soft tissue, and WB and skeletal site-specific BMC acquisition and to measure the age and magnitude of peak velocity for each parameter. The SITAR modeling was performed separately by sex and self-reported race.
Among 2014 healthy children, adolescents, and young adults (1022 50.7% female and 479 23.8% African American) aged 5 to 19 years at study entry, the mean age of peak height velocity was 13.1 years (95% CI, 13.0-13.2 years) in African American boys vs 13.4 years (95% CI, 13.3-13.4 years) in non-African American boys (difference, -0.3 years; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1 years) and 11.0 years (95% CI, 10.8-11.1 years) in African American girls vs 11.6 years (95% CI, 11.5-11.6 years) in non-African American girls (difference, -0.6 years; 95% CI, -0.7 to -0.5 years). Age of peak acquisition of WB BMC was 14.0 years (95% CI, 13.8-14.1 years) in African American boys vs 14.0 years (95% CI, 13.9-14.1 years) in non-African American boys (difference, -0.0 years; 95% CI, -0.2 to 0.2 years) and 12.1 years (95% CI, 12.0-12.3 years) in African American girls vs 12.4 years (95% CI, 12.3-12.5 years) in non-African American girls (difference, -0.3 years; 95% CI, -0.4 to -0.1 years). At age 7 years, children had acquired 69.5% to 74.5% of maximal observed height but only 29.6% to 38.1% of maximal observed WB BMC. Adolescents gained 32.7% to 35.8% of maximal observed WB BMC during the 2 years before and 2 years after peak height velocity. Another 6.9% to 10.7% of maximal observed WB BMC occurred after linear growth had ceased. In the group at highest risk for fracture, non-African American boys, peak fracture incidence occurred approximately 1 year before peak height velocity.
In this longitudinal study, height gains substantially outpaced gains in BMC during childhood, which could contribute to fracture risk. A significant proportion of bone is accrued after adult height is achieved. Therefore, late adolescence represents a potentially underrecognized window of opportunity to optimize bone mass.
Abstract Introduction This randomised double-blind placebo-controlled study evaluated the addition of cediranib, an inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1–3, to standard ...carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods Eligible patients received paclitaxel (200 mg/m2 ) and carboplatin (area under the concentration time curve 6) intravenously every 3 weeks. Daily oral cediranib/placebo 20 mg was commenced day 1 of cycle 1 and continued as monotherapy after completion of 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy. The primary end-point of the study was overall survival (OS). The trial would continue to full accrual if an interim analysis (IA) for progression-free survival (PFS), performed after 170 events of progression or death in the first 260 randomised patients, revealed a hazard ratio (HR) for PFS of ⩽0.70. Results The trial was halted for futility at the IA (HR for PFS 0.89, 95% confidence interval CI 0.66–1.20, p = 0.45). A final analysis was performed on all 306 enrolled patients. The addition of cediranib increased response rate (RR 52% versus 34%, p = 0.001) but did not significantly improve PFS (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.71–1.18, p = 0.49) or OS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.69–1.30, p = 0.72). Cediranib patients had more grade 3 hypertension, diarrhoea and anorexia. Conclusions The addition of cediranib 20 mg daily to carboplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy increased RR and toxicity, but not survival.
PDF
